Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/anstey

Peter R. Anstey (anstey)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Anstey, Peter R. 1995. “Thomas Reid and the Justification of Induction.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12(1): 77–93.
    Anstey, Peter R. 1999. “Boyle on Occasionalism: An Unexamined Source.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60(1): 57–80.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2000a. The Philosophy of Robert Boyle. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy n. 5. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2000b. “ ‘De Anima’ and Descartes: Making up Aristotle’s Mind.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 17(3): 237–260.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2002. “Robert Boyle and the Heuristic Value of Mechanism [on Chalmers (2002)].” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33(1): 157–170.
    Anstey, Peter R., ed. 2003a. The Philosophy of John Locke. New Perspectives. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy n. 7. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2003b. “Locke on Method in Natural Philosophy.” in The Philosophy of John Locke. New Perspectives, edited by Peter R. Anstey, pp. 26–42. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy n. 7. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2004. “The Methodological Origins of Newton’s Queries.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35(2): 247–269.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2005. “Experimental versus Speculative Natural Philosophy.” in The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century. Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy, edited by Peter R. Anstey and John A. Schuster, pp. 215–242. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 19. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Anstey, Peter R., ed. 2006a. John Locke. Critical Assessments. Volume I: Moral and Political Philosophy. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R., ed. 2006b. John Locke. Critical Assessments. Volume II: Knowledge, its Nature and Origins. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R., ed. 2006c. John Locke. Critical Assessments. Volume III: Metaphysics. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R., ed. 2006d. John Locke. Critical Assessments. Volume IV: Biography, Theology, and Education. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2006e. “Introduction.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84(2): 155–158.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2006f. “Review of Monnoyer (2004).” Dialectica 60(1): 93–96.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2009. “Early Modern Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction.” in The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 2: Early Modern Philosophy of Religion, edited by Graham Oppy and Nick N. Trakakis, pp. 1–18. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2010. “John Locke and Helmontian Medicine.” in The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge. Embodied Empiricism in Early Modern Science, edited by Charles T. Wolfe and Ofer Gal, pp. 93–120. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 25. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2011a. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589777.001.0001.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2011b. “Essences and Kinds.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, edited by Desmond M. Clarke and Catherine Wilson, pp. 11–31. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199556137.001.0001.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2011c. “The Matter of Medicine: New Medical Matter Theories in Mid-Seventeenth Century England.” in Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Descartes and Beyond, edited by Dana Jalobeanu and Peter R. Anstey, pp. 61–79. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth Century Philosophy n. 13. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R., ed. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549993.001.0001.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2015a. “John Locke and the Philosophy of Mind.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53(2): 221–244.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2015b. “Revisiting Matter, Form and Mechanism in the Seventeenth Century.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(3): 569–579.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2016a. “Locke and the Problem of Necessity in Early Modern Philosophy.” in The Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language and Computation: Selected Papers, edited by Jonathan Ginzburg, Zurab Khasidashvili, Carl Vogel, Jean-Jaques Lévy, and Enric Vallduvı́, pp. 174–193. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2016b. “The Coherence of Cohesion in the Later Leibniz.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24(4): 594–613.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2016c. “Locke on Measurement.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 60: 70–81.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2016d. “Locke and Natural Philosophy.” in A Companion to Locke, edited by Matthew Stuart, pp. 64–81. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781118328705.
    Anstey, Peter R., ed. 2017. The Idea of Principles in Early Modern Thought. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge.
    Anstey, Peter R. 2018. “Locke.” in The Philosophy of Knowledge: A History, Volume 3: Knowledge in Modern Philosophy, edited by Stephen Gaukroger, pp. 111–128. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Anstey, Peter R. and Braddon-Mitchell, David, eds. 2021. Armstrong’s Materialist Theory of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780192843722.001.0001.
    Anstey, Peter R. and Schuster, John A., eds. 2005. The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century. Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 19. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Jalobeanu, Dana and Anstey, Peter R., eds. 2011. Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Descartes and Beyond. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth Century Philosophy n. 13. London: Routledge.
    MacIntosh, John J. [Jack] and Anstey, Peter R. 2006. “Robert Boyle.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/boyle/.
    MacIntosh, John J. [Jack] and Anstey, Peter R. 2010. “Robert Boyle.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/boyle/.
    MacIntosh, John J. [Jack] and Anstey, Peter R. 2014. “Robert Boyle.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/boyle/.
    MacIntosh, John J. [Jack] and Anstey, Peter R. 2018. “Robert Boyle.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/boyle/.

Further References

    Chalmers, Alan Francis. 2002. “Experiment versus Mechanical Philosophy in the Work of Robert Boyle: A Reply to Anstey (2002) and Pyle (2002).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33(1): 191–197.
    Monnoyer, Jean-Maurice, ed. 2004. La structure du monde: objets, propriétés, états de choses. Renouveau de la métaphysique dans l’école australienne de philosophie. Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage. Paris: Librairie philosophique Jean Vrin.
    Pyle, Andrew. 2002. “Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers (2002).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33(1): 171–186.