Helen De Cruz (decruz)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

De Cruz, Helen. 2009. “Is Linguistic Determinism an Empirically Testable Hypothesis?” Logique et Analyse 52(208): 327–341.
De Cruz, Helen. 2014. “The Enduring Appeal of Natural Theological Arguments.” Philosophy Compass 9(2): 145–153.
De Cruz, Helen. 2015a. “Where Philosophical Intuitions Come From.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93(2): 233–249.
De Cruz, Helen. 2015b. “The Relevance of Hume’s Natural History of Religion for Cognitive Science of Religion.” Res Philosophica 92(3): 653–674.
De Cruz, Helen. 2016a. “Divine Hiddenness and the Cognitive Science of Religion.” in Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief. New Perspectives, edited by Adam Green and Eleonore Stump, pp. 53–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139939621.
De Cruz, Helen. 2016b. “The Naturalness of Religious Belief: Epistemological Implications.” in The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism, edited by Kelly James Clark, pp. 481–392. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781118657775.
De Cruz, Helen. 2016c. “Numerical Cognition and Mathematical Realism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 16(16).
De Cruz, Helen. 2017a. “Religious Disagreement: An Empirical Study Among Academic Philosophers.” Episteme 14(1): 71–87.
De Cruz, Helen. 2017b. “Religion and Science.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/religion-science/.
De Cruz, Helen. 2018. “Prestige Bias: An Obstacle to a Just Academic Philosophy.” Ergo 5(10): 259–287.
De Cruz, Helen. 2019. “Evidential Objections to Atheism.” in A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy, edited by Graham Oppy, pp. 476–490. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781119119302.
De Cruz, Helen. 2020. “Seeking out Epistemic Friction in the Philosophy of Religion.” in Voices from the Edge. Centring Marginalized Perspectives in Analytic Theology, edited by Michelle Panchuk and Michael C. Rea, pp. 23–46. Oxford Studies in Analytic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198848844.001.0001.
De Cruz, Helen. 2021. “Perplexity and Philosophical Progress.” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45: Doubt, edited by Peter A. French, Howard K. Wettstein, and Yuval Avnur, pp. 209–221. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.5840/msp20219166.
De Cruz, Helen, ed. 2022a. Avatar: The Last Airbender and Philosophy. Wisdom from Aang to Zuko. Philosophy and Pop Culture Series. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781119809838.
De Cruz, Helen. 2022b. “Religion and Science.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/religion-science/.
De Cruz, Helen, Boudry, Maarten, De Smedt, Johan and Blancke, Stefaan. 2011. “Evolutionary Approaches to Epistemic Justification.” Dialectica 65(4): 517–535.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2007. “The Role of Intuitive Ontologies in Scientific Understanding – The Case of Human Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy 22(3): 351–368.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2012. “Evolved Cognitive Biases and the Epistemic Status of Scientific Beliefs.” Philosophical Studies 157(3): 411–429.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2013a. “Mathematical Symbols as Epistemic Actions.” Synthese 190(1): 3–19.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2013b. “Reformed and Evolutionary Epistemology and the Noetic Effects of Sin.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74(1): 49–66.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2013c. “The Value of Epistemic Disagreement in Scientific Practice. The Case of Homo Floresiensis.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44(2): 169–177.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2015. A Natural History of Natural Theology. The Cognitive Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2017a. “Emotional Responses to Fiction: An Evolutionary Perspective.” in The Routledge Handbook of Evolution and Philosophy, edited by Richard Joyce, pp. 387–398. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2017b. “Intuitions and Arguments: Cognitive Foundations of Argumentation in Natural Theology.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9(2): 57–82.
De Cruz, Helen and De Smedt, Johan. 2017c. “How Psychological Dispositions Influence the Theology of the Afterlife.” in The Palgrave Handbook of the Afterlife, edited by Yujin Nagasawa and Benjamin Matheson, pp. 435–454. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Smedt, Johan and De Cruz, Helen. 2012. “Human Artistic Behaviour: Adaptation, Byproduct, or Cultural Group Selection?” in Philosophy of Behavioral Biology, edited by Kathryn S. Plaisance and Thomas A. C. Reydon, pp. 167–188. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 282. Dordrecht: Springer.
De Smedt, Johan and De Cruz, Helen. 2013. “Delighting in Natural Beauty: Joint Attention and the Phenomenology of Nature Aesthetics.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5(4): 167–186.
De Smedt, Johan and De Cruz, Helen. 2015. “The Epistemic Value of Speculative Fiction.” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 39: Philosophy and Science Fiction, edited by Peter A. French, Howard K. Wettstein, and Eric Schwitzgebel, pp. 58–77. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell.