Richard Gaskin (gaskin-r)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Gaskin, Richard. 1990. “Platonism and Forms of Life.” Auslegung. A Journal of Philosophy 16(1): 1–16.
Gaskin, Richard. 1993. “The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future.” Phronesis 38(1): 75–94.
Gaskin, Richard. 1994. “Molina on Divine Foreknowledge and the Principle of Bivalence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32(4): 551–571.
Gaskin, Richard. 1995a. The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future. Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie n. 40. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Gaskin, Richard. 1995b. “Bradley’s Regress, the Copula and the Unity of the Proposition.” The Philosophical Quarterly 45(179): 161–180.
Gaskin, Richard. 1995c. “Experience and Criteria.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 38: 261–275.
Gaskin, Richard. 1996a. “Sea Battles, Worn-Out Cloaks, and Other Matters of Interpretation: Weidemann on Aristotle’s ‘Peri Hermeneias’ .” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78(1): 48–59.
Gaskin, Richard. 1996b. “ ‘Kein Etwas, aber auch nicht ein Nichts!’: Kann die Grammatik tatsächlich täuschen?” Grazer Philosophische Studien 51.
Gaskin, Richard. 1997a. “Russell and Richard Brinkley on the Unity of the Proposition.” History and Philosophy of Logic 18(3): 139–150.
Gaskin, Richard. 1997b. “Peter of Ailly and other Fourteenth-Century Thinkers on Divine Power and the Necessitiy of the Past.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79(3): 273–291.
Gaskin, Richard. 1997c. “The Stoics on Cases, Predicates, and the Unity of the Proposition.” in Aristotle and After, edited by Richard Sorabji, pp. 91–108. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
Gaskin, Richard. 1998a. “Fatalism, Bivalence and the Past.” The Philosophical Quarterly 48(190): 83–88.
Gaskin, Richard. 1998b. “The Unity of the Declarative Sentence.” Philosophy 73(283): 21–45.
Gaskin, Richard. 1999. “Tense Logic and the Master Argument.” in Antike Philosophie, edited by Uwe Meixner and Albert Newen, pp. 203–224. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy n. 2. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
Gaskin, Richard, ed. 2001a. Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy n. 7. London: Routledge.
Gaskin, Richard. 2001b. “Ockham’s Mental Language, Connotation, and the Inherence Regress.” in Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality, edited by Dominik Perler, pp. 227–264. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters n. 76. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Gaskin, Richard. 2001c. “Introduction: Proposition and World.” in A Boole Anthology. Recent and Classical Studies in the Logic of George Boole, edited by James Gasser, pp. 1–27. Synthese Library n. 291. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gaskin, Richard. 2001d. “Nonsense and Necessity in Wittgenstein’s Mature Philosophy.” in A Boole Anthology. Recent and Classical Studies in the Logic of George Boole, edited by James Gasser, pp. 199–217. Synthese Library n. 291. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gaskin, Richard. 2006. Experience and the World’s Own Language: A Critique of John McDowell’s Empiricism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0199287252.001.0001.
Gaskin, Richard. 2008. The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239450.001.0001.
Gaskin, Richard. 2009a. “John Wyclif and the Theory of Complexly Signifiables.” Vivarium 47(1): 74–96.
Gaskin, Richard. 2009b. “Bradleys Regress und die Einheit der Proposition.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 57(4): 575–582.
Gaskin, Richard. 2009c. “Realism and the Picture Theory of Meaning.” Philosophical Topics 37(1): 49–62.
Gaskin, Richard. 2010a. “Précis of Gaskin (2008).” Dialectica 64(2): 259–264.
Gaskin, Richard. 2010b. “The Unity of the Proposition: Replies to Vallicella (2010), Schnieder (2010) and Garcı́a-Carpintero (2010).” Dialectica 64(2): 303–311.
Gaskin, Richard. 2010c. “The Unity of the Proposition: Reply to Denyer (2010).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88(4): 729–730.
Gaskin, Richard. 2011. “Reference and the Permutation Argument.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111(2): 295–309.
Gaskin, Richard. 2013. Language, Truth, and Literature. A Defence of Literary Humanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657902.001.0001.
Gaskin, Richard. 2014. “Meaning, Normativity, and Naturalism.” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Philosophy, edited by Barry Dainton and Howard Robinson, pp. 230–254. Bloomsbury Companions. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gaskin, Richard. 2015. “The Identity Theory of Truth.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/truth-identity/.
Gaskin, Richard. 2018. Tragedy and Redress in Western Literature. A Philosophical Perspective. London: Routledge.
Gaskin, Richard. 2020. “The Identity Theory of Truth.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/truth-identity/.
Gaskin, Richard. 2021. Language and the World. A Defence of Linguistic Idealism. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics. London: Routledge.
Gaskin, Richard and Hill, Daniel J. 2012. “On Neutral Relations.” Dialectica 66(1): 167–186, doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2012.01294.x.
Gaskin, Richard and Hill, Daniel J. 2013. “Reach’s Puzzle and Mention.” Dialectica 67(2): 201–222.

Further References

Denyer, Nicholas. 2010. “Critical Notice of Gaskin (2008).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88(1): 173–179.
Garcı́a-Carpintero, Manuel. 2010. “Gaskin’s Ideal Unity [on Gaskin (2008)].” Dialectica 64(2): 279–288.
Schnieder, Benjamin Sebastian. 2010. “Propositions United: Gaskin on Bradley’s Regress and the Unity of the Proposition [on Gaskin (2008)].” Dialectica 64(2): 289–301.
Vallicella, William F. 2010. “Gaskin on the Unity of the Proposition [on Gaskin (2008)].” Dialectica 64(2): 265–277.