Dirk Greimann (greimann)
Email:
greimann(at)dirk-greimann.de
Contributions to Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Greimann, Dirk. 1994. “Freges These der Undefinierbarkeit von Wahrheit: Eine Rekonstruktion ihres Inhalts und ihrer Begründung.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 47: 77–114.
Greimann, Dirk. 1997a. “Die Idee hinter Tarskis Definition von Wahrheit.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28(1): 121–158.
Greimann, Dirk. 1997b. “Hat Frege die Sätze als spezielle Namen konzipiert?” in Analyomen 2. Volume II: Philosophy of Language, Metaphysics, edited by Georg Meggle, pp. 104–111. Perspektiven der analytischen Philosophie / Perspectives in Analytic Philosophy n. 17. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Greimann, Dirk. 2000a. “The Judgement Stroke as a Truth-Operator: A New Interpretation of the Logical Form of Sentences in Frege’s Scientific Language.” Erkenntnis 52: 213–238.
Greimann, Dirk. 2000b. “Explicating Truth: Minimalism and Primitivism.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31(1): 133–155.
Greimann, Dirk. 2000c. “ ‘No Entity Without Identity’: A Reductionist Dogma?” Grazer Philosophische Studien 60.
Greimann, Dirk. 2000d. “Die ontologischen Verpflichtungen der normativen Ethik.” in System, Struktur, Wahrheit, edited by Dirk Greimann and Constanze Peres, pp. 123–143. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Greimann, Dirk. 2001. “Individuating Abstract Objects: the Methodologies of Frege and Quine.” in Grundlagen der Analytischen Philosophie, edited by Uwe Meixner and Albert Newen, pp. 121–142. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy n. 4. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
Greimann, Dirk. 2003a. “What is Frege’s Julius Caesar Problem?” Dialectica 57(3): 261–276.
Greimann, Dirk. 2003b. “Das ontologische Dilemma der Normativen Ethik.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34(1): 15–41.
Greimann, Dirk. 2003c. “Is Zalta’s Individuation of Intensional Entities Circular?” Metaphysica 4(2): 93–101.
Greimann, Dirk. 2003d. “Kant’s Derivation of the Formula of the Categorical Imperative from Its Mere Concept.” in Geschichte der Ethik, edited by Uwe Meixner and Albert Newen, pp. 97–112. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy n. 6. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
Greimann, Dirk. 2004a. “Frege’s Puzzle about the Cognitive Function of Truth.” Inquiry 47(5): 425–442.
Greimann, Dirk. 2004b. “Ist die Ethik Kants ontologisch unschuldig?” Kant-Studien 95(1): 107–127.
Greimann, Dirk. 2007a. “Did Frege Really Consider Truth as an Object?” Grazer Philosophische Studien 75: 125–148. “Essays on Frege’s Conception of Truth,” ed. by Dirk Greimann.
Greimann, Dirk. 2007b. “The Assertoric Use of the Concept of Truth.” in Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language, edited by Dirk Greimann and Geo Siegwart, pp. 90–105. Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy n. 6. London: Routledge.
Greimann, Dirk. 2008. “Does Frege Use a Truth-Predicate in his ‘Justification’ of the Laws of Logic?” Mind 117(466): 403–425.
Greimann, Dirk. 2009. “Contextual Definition and Ontological Commitment.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87(3): 357–373.
Greimann, Dirk. 2012. “A Typology of Conceptual Explications.” Disputatio 4(34): 645–670.
Greimann, Dirk. 2014a. “A Tension in Quine’s Naturalistic Ontology of Semantics.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 89: 161–184. “Themes from Wittgenstein and Quine,” ed. by Kai Büttner, Florian Demont, David Dolby, Anne-Katrin Schlegel and Dirk Greimann.
Greimann, Dirk. 2014b. “Frege on Truth, Assertoric Force and the Essence of Logic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 35(3): 272–288.
Greimann, Dirk. 2015. “Frege’s Performative Argument Against the Relativity of Truth.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3(2).