Johan E. Gustafsson (gustafsson-je)

Cited in the following articles

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Gustafsson, Johan E. 2010. “A Money-Pump for Acyclic Intransitive Preferences.” Dialectica 64(2): 251–257.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2011a. “A Note in Defence of Ratificationism.” Erkenntnis 75(1): 147–150.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2011b. “Phenomenal Continuity and the Bridge Problem.” Philosophia 39(2): 289–296.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2011c. “An Extended Framework for Preference Relations.” Economics and Philosophy 27(2): 101–108.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2013a. “Value-Preference Symmetry and Fitting-Attitude Accounts of Value Relations.” The Philosophical Quarterly 63(252): 476–491.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2013b. “The Irrelevance of the Diachronic Money-Pump Argument for Acyclicity.” The Journal of Philosophy 110(8): 460–464.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2014a. “Combinative Consequentialism and the Problem of Act Versions.” Philosophical Studies 167(3): 585–596.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2014b. “Neither ‘Good’ in Terms of ‘Better’ nor ‘Better’ in Terms of ‘Good’ .” Noûs 48(3): 466–473.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2015. “Sequential Dominance and the Anti-Aggregation Principle.” Philosophical Studies 172(6): 1593–1601.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2016. “Consequentialism with Wrongness Depending on the Difficulty of Doing Better.” Thought 5(2): 108–118.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2017. “A Strengthening of the Consequence Argument for Incompatibilism.” Analysis 77(4): 705–715, doi:10.1093/analys/anx103.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2018. “Bentham’s Binary Form of Maximizing Utilitarianism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(1): 87–109.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2019. “Is Objective Act Consequentialism Satisfiable?” Analysis 79(2): 193–202.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2020a. “A Patch to the Possibility Part of Gödel’s Ontological Proof.” Analysis 80(2): 229–240.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2020b. “Dennett and Taylor’s Alleged Refutation of the Consequence Argument.” Analysis 80(3): 426–433.
Gustafsson, Johan E. 2020c. “Permissibility Is the Only Feasible Deontic Primitive.” in Philosophical Perspectives 34: Ethics, edited by John Hawthorne and Jason Turner, pp. 117–133. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; Sons, Inc., doi:10.1111/phpe.12137.
Gustafsson, Johan E. and Peterson, Martin. 2012. “A Computer Simulation of the Argument from Disagreement.” Synthese 184(3): 387–405.
Gustafsson, Johan E. and Torpman, Olle. 2014. “In Defence of My Favourite Theory.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95: 159–174.