William F. Harms (harms-wf)
My contributions to Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Bradie, Michael and Harms, William F. 2001.
“Evolutionary Epistemology.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/.
Bradie, Michael and Harms, William F. 2004.
“Evolutionary Epistemology.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2004/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/.
Bradie, Michael and Harms, William F. 2008.
“Evolutionary Epistemology.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2008/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/.
Bradie, Michael and Harms, William F. 2012.
“Evolutionary Epistemology.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/.
Bradie, Michael and Harms, William F. 2016.
“Evolutionary Epistemology.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/.
Bradie, Michael and Harms, William F. 2020.
“Evolutionary Epistemology.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/.
Harms, William F. 1998. “The Use of Information Theory in
Epistemology.” Philosophy of Science 65: 472–501.
Harms, William F. 2010. “Determining Truth Conditions in Signaling
Games.” Philosophical Studies 147(1): 23–35.