John Thomas Kearns (kearns-jt)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Kearns, John Thomas. 1966. “Quantifiers and Universal Validity.” Logique et Analyse 9(35–36): 298–309.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1967. “The Contributions of Leśniewski.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8: 61–93.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1968a. “A Universally Valid System of Predicate Calculus with no Existential Presuppositions.” Logique et Analyse 11(43): 368–390.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1968b. “The Logical Concept of Existence.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 9: 313–324.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1969. “Two Views of Variables.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10(2): 163–180.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1970a. “Substance and Time.” The Journal of Philosophy 67: 277–289.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1970b. “Some Remarks prompted by van Fraassen’s Paper [van Fraassen (1970)].” in The Paradox of the Liar, edited by Robert L. Martin, pp. 47–58. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Co. Second edition: Martin (1978).
Kearns, John Thomas. 1974. “Vagueness and Failing Sentences.” Logique et Analyse 17(67–68): 301–315.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1979. “A Little More Like English.” Logique et Analyse 22(87): 353–368.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1980. “Fully Explicit Deductive Systems.” in To H.B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus, and Formalism, edited by Jonathan P. Seldin and J. Roger Hindley, pp. 35–54. New York: Academic Press.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1981. “Modal Semantics without Possible Worlds.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 46: 77–86.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1984. Using Language. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1994. “Meaning, Structure and Speech Acts.” in Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, edited by Savas L. Tsohatzidis, pp. 50–79. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1996. Reconceiving Experience: A Solution to a Problem Inherited from Descartes. SUNY series in Logic and Language. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Kearns, John Thomas. 1997. “Thinking Machines: Some Fundamental Confusions.” Minds and Machines 7: 269–287.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2001. “The Rationality of Reasoning: Commitment and Coherence.” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Wittgenstein Symposium: Rationality and Irrationality, edited by Berit Brogaard and Barry Smith, pp. 192–198. Schriftenreihe der Österreichischen Ludwig Wittgenstein Gesellschaft n. 29. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2002. “Logic is the Study of a Human Activity.” in The Logica Yearbook 2001, edited by Timothy Childers and Ondrej Majer, pp. 101–110. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2003. “The Logic of Coherent Fiction.” in The Logica Yearbook 2002, edited by Timothy Childers and Ondrej Majer, pp. 133–146. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2004. “An Illocutionary Analysis of Conditional Assertions.” in The Logica Yearbook 2003, edited by Libor Běhounek, pp. 159–170. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2006a. “Conditional Assertion, Denial, and Supposition as Illocutionary Acts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 29(4): 455–485.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2006b. “An Elementary System of Ontology.” in The Lvov-Warsaw School: The New Generation, edited by Jacek Juliusz Jadacki and Jacek Paśniczek, pp. 87–112. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2006c. “The Logical Difference Between Knowledge and Justified Belief.” in The Logica Yearbook 2005, edited by Marta Bı́lková and Ondřej Tomala, pp. 101–112. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2007a. “An Illocutionary Logical Explanation of the Liar Paradox.” History and Philosophy of Logic 28(1): 31–66.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2007b. “Recapturing the Epistemic Dimension of Logic.” in The Logica Yearbook 2006, edited by Ondřej Tomala and Radek Honzı́k, pp. 105–116. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2008. “Illocutionary Origins of Familiar Logical Operations.” in The Logica Yearbook 2007, edited by Michal Peliš. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2009. “Using Illocutionary Logic to Understand Vagueness.” Logique et Analyse 52(207): 219–238.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2010. “What is Natural about Natural Deduction.” in The Logica Yearbook 2009, edited by Michal Peliš, pp. 121–132. London: College Publications.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2011. “Affirmation and Denial, Judgments of Composition and of Division.” in The Logica Yearbook 2010, edited by Michal Peliš and Vı́t Punčochář, pp. 113–124. London: College Publications.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2012. “Logics of Fact and Fiction, Where Do Possible Worlds Belong?” in The Logica Yearbook 2011, edited by Michal Peliš and Vı́t Punčochář, pp. 97–106. London: College Publications.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2014. “1st and 3rd Person Logical Theories.” in The Logica Yearbook 2013, edited by Michal Dančák and Vı́t Punčochář, pp. 77–90. London: College Publications.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2016. “The Larger Logical Picture.” in The Logica Yearbook 2015, edited by Pavel Arazim and Michal Dančák, pp. 107–116. London: College Publications.
Kearns, John Thomas. 2018. “ ‘I Asked You to Mail that Letter, Not to Burn It,’ An Illocutionary Logical Analysis of Directive Acts and Arguments.” in The Logica Yearbook 2017, edited by Pavel Arazim and Tomáš Lávička, pp. 169–180. London: College Publications.

Further References

van Fraassen, Bas C. 1970. “Truth and Paradoxical Consequences.” in The Paradox of the Liar, edited by Robert L. Martin, pp. 13–23. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Co. Second edition: Martin (1978).