Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/kulstad

Mark A. Kulstad (kulstad)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Cover, Jan A. and Kulstad, Mark A., eds. 1990. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Essays Presented to Jonathan Bennett. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1977a. Frankfurt’s Interpretation of Descartes’ Validation of Reason.” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8(2): 7–16.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1977b. Leibniz’s Conception of Expression.” Studia Leibnitiana 9(1): 55–76.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1980. A closer look at Leibniz’s Alleged Reduction of Relations.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 18: 417–432.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1981. Leibniz, Animals, and Apperception.” Studia Leibnitiana 13(1): 25–60.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1982. Some Difficulties in Leibniz’s Definition of Perception.” in Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays, edited by Michael Hooker, pp. 65–78. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1984. Locke on Consciousness and Reflection.” Studia Leibnitiana 16(2): 143–167.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1986. Review of Jolley (1984).” Studia Leibnitiana 18(1): 99–101.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1991. Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness and Reflection. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1993. Causation and Preestablished Harmony in the Early Development of Leibniz’s Philosophy.” in Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony, edited by Steven M. Nadler, pp. 93–118. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1996. Spinoza’s Demonstration of Monism: A New Line of Defense.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13(3): 299–316. Reprinted in Goff (2011).
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1999a. Leibnizian meditations on monism, force, and substance, in relation to Descartes, Spinoza and Malebranche.” Leibniz Review 9: 17–42.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1999b. Leibniz, Spinoza, and Tschirnhaus: Multiple Worlds, Possible Worlds.” in The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy (1646-76), edited by Stuart Brown, pp. 245–262. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas n. 166. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 1999c. Leibniz’s De summa rerum. The origin of the varieties of things, in connection with the Spinoza-Tschirnhaus correspondence.” in L’actualité de Leibniz: Les deux Labyrinthes. Décade de Cerisy La Salle, 15 au 22 Juin 1995, edited by Dominique Berlioz and Frédéric Nef, pp. 69–86. Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa n. 34. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 2001. Leibniz’s Early Argument That All Things Are One in Relation to Descartes’ Notions of Real and Modal Distinction.” in VII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Nihil sine ratione. Mensch, Natur und Technik im Wirken von G. W. Leibniz. Schirmherrschaft: Der Regierende Bürgermeister von Berlin. Vorträge Teil 2. Berlin, 10.-14. September 2001, edited by Hans Poser, Christoph Asmuth, Ursula Goldenbaum, and Wenchao Li, pp. 663–668. Hannover: Leibniz Gesellschaft.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 2002a. Leibniz, Spinoza, and Tschirnhaus: Metaphysics à trois.” in Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, edited by Olli Koistinen and John I. Biro, pp. 221–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/019512815X.001.0001.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 2002b. Exploring Middle Ground: Was Leibniz’s Conception of God ever Spinozistic? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76(4): 671–690.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 2003. What Spinoza, in company with Leibniz and Descartes, can bring to Light about Important Varieties of Substance Monism.” in Monism, edited by Andreas Bächli and Klaus Petrus, pp. 63–82. Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 9. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
    Kulstad, Mark A. 2005. The One and the Many and Kinds of Distinctness: The Possibility of Monism and Pantheism in the Young Leibniz.” in Leibniz. Nature and Freedom, edited by Donald P. Rutherford and Jan A. Cover, pp. 20–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195143744.001.0001.
    Kulstad, Mark A. and Carlin, Laurence. 1997. Leibniz’s Philosophy of Mind.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win1997/entries/leibniz-mind/.
    Kulstad, Mark A. and Carlin, Laurence. 2002. Leibniz’s Philosophy of Mind.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2002/entries/leibniz-mind/.
    Kulstad, Mark A. and Carlin, Laurence. 2013. Leibniz’s Philosophy of Mind.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/leibniz-mind/.
    Kulstad, Mark A. and Carlin, Laurence. 2020. Leibniz’s Philosophy of Mind.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/leibniz-mind/.
    Kulstad, Mark A., Lærke, Mogens and Snyder, David, eds. 2009. The Philosophy of the Young Leibniz. Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft n. 35. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Further References

    Goff, Philip, ed. 2011. Spinoza on Monism. Philosophers in Depth. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Jolley, Nicholas. 1984. Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.