Peter J. Loptson (loptson)

Contributi a Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Loptson, Peter J. 1977. “Cartesian Dualism.” Idealistic Studies 7: 50–60.
Loptson, Peter J. 1980a. “Anselm, Meinong, and the Ontological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11(3): 185–194.
Loptson, Peter J. 1980b. “Q, Entailment, and the Parry Property.” Logique et Analyse 23(90–91): 305–317.
Loptson, Peter J. 1984. “Anselm and Rowe: A Reply to Davis.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15(1): 67–71.
Loptson, Peter J. 1985. “Leibniz, Sufficient Reason, and Possible Worlds.” Studia Leibnitiana 17(2): 191–203.
Loptson, Peter J. 1986. “Conceiving as Existent: A Final Rejoinder to Davis [on Davis (1984)].” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19(1): 123–125.
Loptson, Peter J. 1996. “Prior, Plantinga, Haecceity, and the Possible.” in Logic and Reality: Essays on the Legacy of Arthur Prior, edited by B. Jack Copeland, pp. 419–435. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loptson, Peter J. 1998. “Hume, Multiperspectival Pluralism, and Authorial Voice.” Hume Studies 24(2): 313–334.
Loptson, Peter J. 2009. “Contra Meinong.” in Russell vs. Meinong. The Legacy of “On Denoting” , edited by Nicholas Griffin and Dale Jacquette, pp. 233–247. Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy n. 30. London: Routledge.
Loptson, Peter J. 2012. “Hume and Ancient Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20(4): 741–772.
Loptson, Peter J. 2014. “Hume’s Disappointingly Accurate Conclusions: General and Specific.” in Shifting the Paradigm. Alternative Perspectives on Induction, edited by Paolo C. Biondi and Louis F. Groarke, pp. 11–50. Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 55. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Further References

Davis, Stephen T. 1984. “Loptson on Anselm and Davis [reply to Loptson (1984)].” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16(3): 245–249.