Robert Stern (stern-ro)

Mentioned on the following portal pages

Cited in the following articles

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Cohen, Alix A. and Stern, Robert, eds. 2017a. Thinking about the Emotions: A Philosophical History. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198766858.001.0001.
Cohen, Alix A. and Stern, Robert. 2017b. “Introduction.” in Thinking about the Emotions: A Philosophical History, edited by Alix A. Cohen and Robert Stern, pp. 1–8. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198766858.001.0001.
Fink, Hans and Stern, Robert, eds. 2017. What is Ethically Demanded? K.E. Løgstrup’s Philosophy of Moral Life. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, doi:10.2307/j.ctvpj755r.
Gava, Gabriele and Stern, Robert, eds. 2016a. Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy. Routledge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Gava, Gabriele and Stern, Robert. 2016b. “Introduction.” in Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, edited by Gabriele Gava and Robert Stern, pp. 1–21. Routledge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Saunders, Joe and Stern, Robert. 2023. “The Individual as an Object of Love: The Property View of Love Meets the Hegelian View of Properties.” Ergo 10(12): 341–371, doi:10.3998/ergo.4642.
Stern, Robert. 1990. Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert. 1991. “Comment [on Walker (1991)].” in Thought and Faith in the Philosophy of Hegel, edited by John Walker, pp. 169–178. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées n. 121. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Stern, Robert. 1992. “The Relation between Moral Theory and Metaphysics.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 143–159.
Stern, Robert, ed. 1993a. G.W.F. Hegel. Critical Assessments. Volume I: NIneteenth-Century Readings. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert, ed. 1993b. G.W.F. Hegel. Critical Assessments. Volume II: Late Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Readings. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert, ed. 1993c. G.W.F. Hegel. Critical Assessments. Volume III: Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit and Logic. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert, ed. 1993d. G.W.F. Hegel. Critical Assessments. Volume IV: Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature and Philosophy of Spirit. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert. 1999. “Going Beyond the Kantian Philosophy: On McDowell’s Hegelian Critique of Kant.” European Journal of Philosophy 7(2): 247–269.
Stern, Robert, ed. 2000a. Transcendental Arguments. Problems and Prospects. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2000b. “Introduction.” in Transcendental Arguments. Problems and Prospects, edited by Robert Stern, pp. 1–12. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2000c. “On Kant’s Response to Hume. The Second Analogy as Transcendental Argument.” in Transcendental Arguments. Problems and Prospects, edited by Robert Stern, pp. 47–66. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2001. Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert. 2003. “On Strawson’s Naturalistic Turn.” in Strawson and Kant, edited by Hans-Johann Glock, pp. 219–233. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2004a. Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism. Answering the Question of Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2004b. “Coherence as a Test for Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69(2): 296–326.
Stern, Robert. 2004c. “Does ‘Ought’ Imply ‘Can’? And Did Kant Think It Does?” Utilitas 16(1): 42–61, doi:10.1017/s0953820803001055.
Stern, Robert. 2006a. “Metaphysical Dogmatism, Humean Scepticism, Kantian Criticism.” Kantian Review 11: 102–116.
Stern, Robert. 2006b. “Hegel’s Doppelsatz: A Neutral Reading.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44(2): 235–266.
Stern, Robert. 2007a. “Transcendental Arguments: a Plea for Modesty.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 74: 143–161. “Philosophical Knowledge. Its Possibility and Scope,” ed. by Christian Beyer and Alex Burri.
Stern, Robert. 2007b. “Freedom, Self-Legislation and Morality in Kant and Hegel: Constructivist vs. Realist Accounts.” in German Idealism. Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Espen Hammer, pp. 245–266. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert. 2007c. “Hegel, British Idealism, and the Curious Case of the Concrete Universal.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(1): 115–153.
Stern, Robert. 2007d. “Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Secondness.” Inquiry 50(2): 123–155.
Stern, Robert. 2007e. “Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Firstness.” in Metaphysik / Metaphysics, edited by Jürgen Stolzenberg and Karl Ameriks, pp. 276–308. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus / International Yearbook of German Idealism n. 5. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Stern, Robert. 2008. “Kant’s Response to Skepticism.” in The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, edited by John Greco, pp. 265–285. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195183214.001.0001.
Stern, Robert. 2009a. Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239108.001.0001.
Stern, Robert. 2009b. “Review of Forster (2008).” Kantian Review 14(1): 141–146.
Stern, Robert. 2009c. “Hegel’s Idealism.” in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by Frederick C. Beiser, pp. 135–173. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2010. “Moral Scepticism and Agency: Kant and Korsggaard.” Ratio 23(4): 453–473. Reprinted in De Gaynesford (2011, 99–120).
Stern, Robert. 2011a. “The Value of Humanity: Reflections on Korsgaard’s Transcendental Argument.” in Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism, edited by Joel Smith and Peter M. Sullivan, pp. 74–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608553.001.0001.
Stern, Robert. 2011b. “Transcendental Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/transcendental-arguments/.
Stern, Robert. 2011c. “Hegel and Pragmatism.” in A Companion to Hegel, edited by Stephen Houlgate and Michael Baur, pp. 556–575. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781444397161.
Stern, Robert. 2012a. Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2012b. “Understanding Moral Obligation : A Précis [of Stern (2012a)].” Inquiry 55(6): 563–566.
Stern, Robert. 2012c. “A Reply to My Critics [Baxley (2012), Moyar (2012), Bristow (2012)].” Inquiry 55(6): 622–654.
Stern, Robert. 2012d. “Is Hegel’s Master–Slave Dialectic a Refutation of Solipsism?” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20(2): 333–361.
Stern, Robert. 2013a. “An Hegelian in Strange Costume? On Peirce’s Relation to Hegel I.” Philosophy Compass 8(1): 53–62.
Stern, Robert. 2013b. “An Hegelian in Strange Costume? On Peirce’s Relation to Hegel II.” Philosophy Compass 8(1): 63–72.
Stern, Robert. 2013c. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant: From Dichotomy to Identity.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21(4): 807–810.
Stern, Robert. 2013d. “Whither Philosophy?” Metaphilosophy 44(3): 222–229.
Stern, Robert. 2013e. “Nietzsche, Amor Fati and the Gay Science.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113(2): 145–162.
Stern, Robert. 2013f. “Moral Skepticism, Constructivism, and the Value of Humanity.” in Constructivism in Ethics, edited by Carla Bagnoli, pp. 22–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2013g. “ ‘My Station and Its Duties’: Social-Role Accounts of Obligation in Green and Bradley.” in The Impact of Idealism. The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought. Volume 1. Philosophy and Science, edited by Karl Ameriks, pp. 299–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2014. “Divine Commands and Secular Demands: On Darwall on Anscombe on ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ .” Mind 123(492): 1095–1122.
Stern, Robert. 2015a. Kantian Ethics. Value, Agency and Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722298.001.0001.
Stern, Robert. 2015b. “Hegelianism vs. Spinozism? A. W. Moore on Hegel.” Philosophical Topics 43(1–2): 97–112.
Stern, Robert. 2015c. “Transcendental Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/transcendental-arguments/.
Stern, Robert. 2016a. “Why Hegel Now (Again) – and in What Form?” in The History of Philosophy, edited by Anthony O’Hear, pp. 187–210. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement n. 78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2016b. “Round Kant or Through Him? On James’s Arguments for Freedom, and Their Relation to Kant’s.” in Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, edited by Gabriele Gava and Robert Stern, pp. 152–176. Routledge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert. 2017a. “Freedom, Norms, and Nature in Hegel: Self-Legislation or Self-Realization?” in Hegel on Philosophy in History, edited by Rachel Zuckert and James Kreines, pp. 88–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316145012.
Stern, Robert. 2017b. “British Idealism.” in The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy, edited by Sacha Golob and Jens Timmermann, pp. 535–548. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781139519267.
Stern, Robert. 2017c. “ ‘Trust is Basic’: Løgstrup on the Priority of Trust.” in The Philosophy of Trust, edited by Paul Faulkner and Thomas W. Simpson, pp. 272–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732549.001.0001.
Stern, Robert. 2019a. The Radical Demand in Løgstrup’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198829027.001.0001.
Stern, Robert. 2019b. “Levinas, Darwall, and Løgstrup on Second-Personal Ethics: Command or Responsibility?” in The Oxford Handbook of Levinas, edited by Michael L. Morgan, pp. 303–320. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190455934.001.0001.
Stern, Robert. 2019c. “Transcendental Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/transcendental-arguments/.
Stern, Robert. 2020a. “Martin Luther.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/luther/.
Stern, Robert. 2020b. “Luther’s Influence on Philosophy.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/luther-influence/.
Stern, Robert and Cheng, Tony. 2023. “Transcendental Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/transcendental-arguments/.

Further References

Baxley, Anne Margaret. 2012. “The Problem of Obligation, the Finite Rational Will, and Kantian Value Realism [on Stern (2012a)].” Inquiry 55(6): 567–583.
Bristow, William F. 2012. “Thinking outside the Circle: The Place of Kierkegaard in Stern’s Understanding Moral Obligation [on Stern (2012a)].” Inquiry 55(6): 606–621.
De Gaynesford, Maximilian, ed. 2011. Agents and Their Actions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781444346763.
Forster, Michael N. 2008. Kant and Skepticism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Moyar, Dean. 2012. “How the Good Obligates in Hegel’s Conception of Sittlichkeit: A Response to Stern (2012a).” Inquiry 55(6): 584–605.
Walker, John. 1991. “Absolute Knowledge and the Experience of Faith. The Relevance of the Religious Dimension in Hegel’s Thought.” in Thought and Faith in the Philosophy of Hegel, edited by John Walker, pp. 151–168. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées n. 121. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.