Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/stoneham

Tom Stoneham (stoneham)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Allen, Keith and Stoneham, Tom, eds. 2011a. Causation and Modern Philosophy. London: Routledge.
    Allen, Keith and Stoneham, Tom. 2011b. Introduction.” in Causation and Modern Philosophy, edited by Keith Allen and Tom Stoneham, pp. 1–12. London: Routledge.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2005a. The Substraction Argument for Metaphysical Nihilism.” The Journal of Philosophy 102(6): 235–238.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2005b. Truthmakers and Possible Worlds.” Analysis 65(4): 290–294.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2005c. Genuine Modal Realism and the Empty World.” European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1(1): 21–37.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2006. Combinatorialism and the Possibility of Nothing.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84(2): 269–280.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2008. What is the Principle of Recombination? Dialectica 62(4): 483–494.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2009a. Justifying Metaphysical Nihilism: A Response to Cameron.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59(234): 132–137.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2009b. Is Metaphysical Nihilism Interesting? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90: 210–231.
    Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom. 2013. Methodological Separatism, Modal Pluralism, and Metaphysical Nihilism.” in The Puzzle of Existence. Why Is There Something Rather than Nothing?, edited by Tyron Craig Goldschmidt, pp. 144–166. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics n. 6. London: Routledge.
    Lodge, Paul and Stoneham, Tom, eds. 2015a. Locke and Leibniz on Substance. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy n. 14. London: Routledge.
    Lodge, Paul and Stoneham, Tom. 2015b. Introduction.” in Locke and Leibniz on Substance, edited by Paul Lodge and Tom Stoneham, pp. 1–7. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy n. 14. London: Routledge.
    Stoneham, Tom. 1992. Comment on Davies: A General Dilemma? [on Davies (1992)].” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 225–231.
    Stoneham, Tom. 1995. Transparency, Sense, and Self-Knowledge.” in Frege, Sense and Reference One Hundred Years Later, edited by John I. Biro and Petr Kotátko, pp. 103–112. Philosophical Studies Series n. 65. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Stoneham, Tom. 1998. On Believing That I Am Thinking.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98: 125–144.
    Stoneham, Tom. 1999. Boghossian on Empty Natural Kind Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99: 119–122.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2002. Berkeley’s World: an examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2003a. On Equivocation.” Philosophy 78: 515–519.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2003b. Temporal Externalism.” Philosophical Papers 32(1): 97–107.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2005. George Berkeley: A Treatins Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” in Central Works of Philosophy volume 2: the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century, edited by John Shand, pp. 137–166. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2006. Berkeley’s ‘Esse Is Percipi’ and Collier’s ‘Simple’ Argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 23(3): 211–224.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2007. A reductio of Coherentism.” Analysis 67(3): 254–257.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2008. A Neglected Account of Perception.” Dialectica 62(3): 307–322.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2009. Berkeley: Arguments for Idealism.” in The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, edited by Robin Le Poidevin, Peter M. Simons, Andrew McGonigal, and Ross P. Cameron, pp. 119–130. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203879306.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2010. Berkeley.” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, edited by Timothy O’Connor and Constantine Sandis, pp. 496–504. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781444323528.
    Stoneham, Tom. 2017. Three Dialogues between Hylas, Philonous and the Sceptic.” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley, edited by Bertil Belfrage and Richard J. Brook, pp. 121–140. Bloomsbury Companions. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Stoneham, Tom and Cei, Angelo. 2009. ‘Let the Occult Quality Go’: Interpreting Berkeley’s Metaphysic of Science.” European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 5(1): 73–91.

Further References

    Davies, Martin Kinsey. 1992. Perceptual Content and Local Supervenience.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 21–45.