Jan Willem Wieland (wieland-jw)
Cited in the following articles
In Defence of Facts: Grounding, Essential Properties and the Unity ProblemContributions to Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Robichaud, Philip and Wieland, Jan Willem, eds. 2017. Responsibility. The Epistemic Condition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198779667.001.0001.
Weber, Erik, Wieland, Jan Willem and De Mey, Tim. 2010. “Introduction.” Logique et Analyse 53(211): 247–249.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2010. “Anti-Positionalism’s Regress.” Axiomathes 20(4): 479–493.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Filling a Typical Gap in a Regress Argument.” Logique et Analyse 54(216): 589–597.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012a. “And So On. Two Theories of Regress Arguments in Philosophy.” PhD dissertation, Gent: Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte, Universiteit Gent.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012b. “Can Pyrrhonists Act Normally?” Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action 15(3): 277–289.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013a. “Infinite Regress Arguments.” Acta Analytica 28(1): 95–109, doi:10.1007/s12136-012-0165-1.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013b. “What Carroll’s Tortoise Actually Proves.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16(5): 983–997.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013c. “Strong and Weak Regress Arguments.” Logique et Analyse 56(224): 439–461.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2014a. Infinite Regress Arguments. Springer Briefs in Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2014b. “Sceptical Rationality.” Analytic Philosophy 55(2): 222–238.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2015. “Access and the Shirker Problem.” American Philosophical Quarterly 52(3): 289–300.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2017a. “Responsibility for Strategic Ignorance.” Synthese 194(11): 4477–4497.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2017b. “Introduction: The Epistemic Condition.” in Responsibility. The Epistemic Condition, edited by Philip Robichaud and Jan Willem Wieland, pp. 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198779667.001.0001.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2017c. “What’s Special about Moral Ignorance?” Ratio 30(2): 149–164.
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2017d. “Evidence One Does Not Possess.” Ergo 4(26): 739–757.
Wieland, Jan Willem and Betti, Arianna. 2008. “Relata-Specific Relations: A Response to Vallicella (2002).” Dialectica 62(4): 509–524, doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01167.x.
Wieland, Jan Willem and Robichaud, Philip. 2017. “Blame Transfer.” in Responsibility. The Epistemic Condition, edited by Philip Robichaud and Jan Willem Wieland, pp. 281–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198779667.001.0001.
Further References
Vallicella, William F. 2002. “Relations, Monism, and the Vindication of Bradley’s Regress.” Dialectica 56(1): 3–36, doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2002.tb00227.x.