Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/wippel

John F. Wippel (wippel)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Wippel, John F. 1973. Godfrey of Fontaines and the Act-Potency Axiom.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 11(3): 299–317.
    Wippel, John F. 1979. Godfrey of Fontaines on Intension and Remission of Accidental Forms.” Franciscan Studies 39: 316–355.
    Wippel, John F. 1981a. James of Viterbo on the Essence-Existence Relationship (Quodlibet 1, q.4) and Godfrey of Fontaines on the Relationship between Nature and Supposit (Quodlibet 7, q.5).” in Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter (Akten des VI. Internationalen Kongresses für Mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Etude de la Philosophie Médiévale. 29. August – 3. September 1977 in Bonn). 2. Band, edited by Wolfgang Kluxen, pp. 777–787. Miscellanea Mediaevalia n. 13/2. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    Wippel, John F. 1981b. Did Thomas Aquinas Defend the Possibility of an Eternally Created World? (The De aeternitate mundi Revisited).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 19(1): 21–37.
    Wippel, John F. 1982a. Essence and Existence.” in The Cambridge History of Later Mediaeval Philosophy: from the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism 1100–1600, edited by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony John Patrick Kenny, Jan Pinborg, and Eleonore Stump, pp. 385–410. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Pasnau and Dyke (2010, II: 622–633).
    Wippel, John F. 1982b. The Relationship between Essence and Existence in Late-thirteenth-century thought: Gilles of Rome, Henry of Ghent, Godfrey of Fontaines, and James of Viterbo.” in Philosophies of Existence: Ancient and Medieval, edited by Parviz Morewedge, pp. 131–164. New York: Fordham University Press.
    Wippel, John F. 1984. Divine Knowledge, Divine Power and Human Freedom in Thomas Aquinas and Henry of Ghent.” in Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy, edited by Tamar M. Rudavsky, pp. 213–242. Synthese Historical Library n. 25. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
    Wippel, John F. 1987a. Thomas Aquinas on Substance as a Cause of Proper Accident.” in Philosophie im Mittelalter. Entwicklungslinien und Paradigmen, edited by Jan Peter Beckmann, Ludger Honnefelder, Gangolf Schrimpf, and Georg Wieland, pp. 201–212. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. Second edition: Beckmann et al. (1996).
    Wippel, John F. 1987b. Thomas Aquinas’s Derivation of the Aristotelian Categories (Predicaments).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25(1): 13–34.
    Wippel, John F. 1990. Thomas Sutton on Divine Knowledge of Futre Contingents (Quodlibet II, qu.5).” in Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy. Proceedings of the Eight International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (S.I.E.P.M.), Helsinki 24-29 August 1987. Volume II, edited by Simo Knuuttila, R. Tyorinoja, and Sten Ebbesen, pp. 364–372. Publications of Luther-Agricola Society B n. 19. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica, Akateeminen Kirjakauppa.
    Wippel, John F. 1992. Thomas Aquinas on What Philosophers can Know About God.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66(3): 279–297.
    Wippel, John F. 1993. Metaphysics.” in The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, edited by Norman Kretzmann and Eleonore Stump, pp. 85–127. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wippel, John F. 1994a. Godfrey of Fontaines (b. ca. 1250; d. 1306/09), Peter of Auvergne (d. 1303), and John Baconthorpe (d. 1345/48).” in Individuation in Scholasticism. The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation 1150–1650, edited by Jorge J. E. Gracia, pp. 221–256. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
    Wippel, John F. 1994b. James of Viterbo (b. ca. 1255; d. 1308).” in Individuation in Scholasticism. The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation 1150–1650, edited by Jorge J. E. Gracia, pp. 257–270. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
    Wippel, John F. 1995. Mediaeval Reactions to the Encounters between Faith and Reason. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press. The Aquinas Lecture, 1995.
    Wippel, John F. 1998. Siger of Brabant: What It Means to Proceed Philosophically.” in Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Akten des X. Internationalen Kongresses für mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale; 25 bis 30. August 1997 in Erfurt, edited by Jan A. Aertsen and Andreas Speer, pp. 490–496. Miscellanea Mediaevalia n. 26. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    Wippel, John F. 2000. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: from Finite Being to Uncreated Beings. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
    Wippel, John F. 2001. Godfrey of Fontaines.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2001/entries/godfrey/.
    Wippel, John F. 2002a. The Parisian Condemnations of 1270 and 1277.” in A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, edited by Jorge J. E. Gracia and Timothy B. Noone, pp. 65–76. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470996669.
    Wippel, John F. 2002b. Godfrey of Fontaines.” in A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, edited by Jorge J. E. Gracia and Timothy B. Noone, pp. 272–280. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470996669.
    Wippel, John F. 2005a. Natur und Gnade (S.th. I-II, qq. 109-114).” in Thomas von Aquin: Die Summa theologiae, edited by Andreas Speer, pp. 246–270. Werkinterpretationen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    Wippel, John F. 2005b. Thomas Aquinas and Siger of Brabant on Being and the Science of Being as Being.” The Modern Schoolman 82: 143–168.
    Wippel, John F. 2006a. Godfrey of Fontaines on Intelligible Species.” in Intellect et imagination dans la philosophie médiévale. Actes du XIe Congrès International de Philosophie Médiévale de la Société Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale (S.I.E.P.M.). Porto, du 26 au 31 août 2002. Tome II, edited by Maria Cândida Pacheco and José Francisco Meirinhos, pp. 1131–1142. Rencontres de Philosophie Médiévale n. 11. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
    Wippel, John F. 2006b. Godfrey of Fontaines’ Quodlibet XIV on Justice as a General Virtue.” in Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century, edited by Christopher Schabel, pp. 287–344. Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition n. 1. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    Wippel, John F. 2006c. Godfrey of Fontaines.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2006/entries/godfrey/.
    Wippel, John F. 2007a. Thomas Aquinas on the Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything at All Rather than Nothing Whatsoever? The Review of Metaphysics 60(4): 731–753. Reprinted in Wippel (2011a, 84–107).
    Wippel, John F. 2007b. Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy n. 47. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
    Wippel, John F. 2009. Thomas Aquinas.” in The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 3: Medieval Philosophy of Religion, edited by Graham Oppy and Nick N. Trakakis, pp. 167–180. London: Routledge.
    Wippel, John F. 2010. Godfrey of Fontaines.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/godfrey/.
    Wippel, John F., ed. 2011a. The Ultimate Why Question: Why is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy n. 54. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
    Wippel, John F. 2011b. Introduction.” in The Ultimate Why Question: Why is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever?, edited by John F. Wippel, pp. 1–27. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy n. 54. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
    Wippel, John F. 2011c. Thomas Aquinas and the Unity of Substantial Form.” in Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages. A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, edited by Kent Emery Jr., Russell L. Friedman, and Andreas Speer, pp. 117–154. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters n. 105. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    Wippel, John F. 2012a. Metaphysical Composition of Angels in Bonaventure, Aquinas, and Godfrey of Fontaines.” in A Companion to Angels in Medieval Philosophy, edited by Tobias Hoffmann, pp. 45–78. Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition n. 35. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    Wippel, John F. 2012b. Being.” in The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, edited by Brian Davies and Eleonore Stump, pp. 77–84. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195326093.001.0001.
    Wippel, John F. 2014. Godfrey of Fontaines.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/godfrey/.
    Wippel, John F. 2016. Metaphysical Themes in De malo, I.” in Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil. A Critical Guide, edited by M. V. Dougherty, pp. 12–33. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107360167.
    Wippel, John F. 2018. Godfrey of Fontaines.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/godfrey/.

Further References

    Pasnau, Robert and Dyke, Christina van, eds. 2010. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.