Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/atherton-m

Margaret Atherton (atherton-m)

Contributions à Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Atherton, Margaret. 1983. Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity.” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8: Contemporary perspectives on the history of philosophy, edited by Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling Jr., and Howard K. Wettstein, pp. 273–293. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
    Atherton, Margaret. 1984. Knowledge of Substance and Knowledge of Science in Locke’s Essay.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 1(4): 413–428.
    Atherton, Margaret. 1987. Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” in Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, edited by Ernest Sosa, pp. 45–60. Synthese Historical Library n. 29. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Atherton, Margaret. 1990. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
    Atherton, Margaret. 1991. Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29(1): 47–67.
    Atherton, Margaret. 1992. Ideas in the Mind, Qualities in Bodies: Some Distinctive Features of Locke’s Account of Primary and Secondary Qualities.” in Minds, Ideas and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy, edited by Phillip D. Cummins and Guenter Zoeller, pp. 111–124. Noth American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy n. 2. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Co.
    Atherton, Margaret, ed. 1994. Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co.
    Atherton, Margaret. 1995. Berkeley without God.” in Berkeley’s Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays, edited by Robert G. Muehlmann, pp. 231–248. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2001. Balls of Wax and Cans of Worms: The Early History of Object Perception.” in From Fragments to Objects: Segmentation and Grouping in Vision, edited by Thomas F. Shipley and Philip J. Kellman, pp. 19–34. Advances in Psychology n. 130. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2002. Women Philosophers in Early Modern England.” in A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Steven M. Nadler, pp. 404–422. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470998847.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2003a. Asking about the Nature of Colour [Comment on McLaughlin (2003)].” in Colour Perception. Mind and the physical world, edited by Rainer Mausfeld and Dieter Heyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2003b. Mr Abbott and Professor Fraser: A Nineteenth Century Debate about Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85(1): 21–50.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2003c. How Berkeley Can Maintain That Snow Is White.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67(1): 101–113.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2004. Green is like Bread – The Nature of Descartes’ Account of Color Perception.” in Perception and Reality: From Descartes to the Present, edited by Ralph Schumacher, pp. 27–42. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2005. Descartes Among the British: the Case of the Theory of Vision.” in Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe, edited by Tad M. Schmaltz, pp. 200–214. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth Century Philosophy n. 8. London: Routledge.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2006. Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” in The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, edited by Kenneth P. Winkler, pp. 94–124. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2007. Locke on Essences and Classification.” in The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Lex Newman, pp. 258–285. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2008a. ‘The Books are in the Study as Before’: Berkeley’s Claims about Real Physical Objects.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16(1): 85–100.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2008b. What have we learned when we learn to See? Lessons Learned from the Theory of Vision Vindicated.” in Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell, edited by Paul Hoffman, David Owen, and Gideon Yaffe, pp. 273–288. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2010. Berkeley’s Last Word on Spirit.” in Essays on the Concept of Mind in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Petr Glombı́ček and James Hill, pp. 115–130. Newcastle upon Tye: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2015. Berkeley and Locke on Real Knowledge.” in The Battle of the Gods and Giants Redux. Papers presented to Thomas M. Lennon, edited by Patricia Easton and Kurt Smith, pp. 262–276. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History n. 248. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    Atherton, Margaret. 2019. Berkeley. Blackwell Great Minds. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781119537403.
    Atherton, Margaret and Schwartz, Robert. 1974. Linguistic Innateness and Its Evidence.” The Journal of Philosophy 71(6): 155–168. Reprinted in Stich (1975, 203–218).

Further References

    McLaughlin, Brian P. 2003. The Place of Colour in Nature.” in Colour Perception. Mind and the physical world, edited by Rainer Mausfeld and Dieter Heyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Stich, Stephen P., ed. 1975. Innate Ideas. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.