Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/bezuidenhout

Anne L. Bezuidenhout (bezuidenhout)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Bach, Kent and Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2002. Distinguishing Semantics and Pragmatics.” in Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics, edited by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O’Rourke, and David Shier, pp. 284–310. New York: Seven Bridges Press. Proceedings of the Eastern Washington University and the University of Idaho Inland Northwest Philosophy Conference on Meaning.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 1993. The Impossibility of Punctate Mental Representations.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 46: 197–212. “Holism: A Consumer Update,” ed. by Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 1997a. Pragmatics, Semantic Underdetermination and the Referential/Attributive Distinction.” Mind 106(423): 375–409.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 1997b. The Communication of De Re Thoughts.” Noûs 31(2): 197–223.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 1998. Is Verbal Communication a Purely Preservative Process? The Philosophical Review 107(2): 261–288.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2000. Attitude Ascriptions, Context and Interpretative Resemblance.” in The Pragmatics of Propositional Attitude Reports, edited by Katarzyna [Kasia] M. Jaszczolt, pp. 137–168. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface n. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2001. Metaphor and What is Said: A Defense of a Direct Expression View of Metaphor.” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25: Figurative Language, edited by Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein, pp. 156–186. Boston, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2002a. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics.” in Philosophical Perspectives 16: Language and Mind, edited by James E. Tomberlin, pp. 105–134. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2002b. Generalized Conversational Implicatures and Default Pragmatic Inferences.” in Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics, edited by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O’Rourke, and David Shier, pp. 257–283. New York: Seven Bridges Press. Proceedings of the Eastern Washington University and the University of Idaho Inland Northwest Philosophy Conference on Meaning.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2005a. Review of Carston (2002).” Mind 114(455): 722–728.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2005b. Indexical and Perspectivals.” Facta Philosophica 7(1): 3–18.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2006. Language as Internal.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by Ernest LePore and Barry C. Smith, pp. 127–139. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.001.0001.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2013. Structuring Silence versus the Structure of Silence.” in Kant. Making Reason Intuitive, edited by Kyriaki Goudeli, Pavlos Kontos, and Ioli Patellis, pp. 36–52. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2015. The Implicit Dimension of Meaning: Ways of ‘Filling In’ and ‘Filling Out’ Content.” Erkenntnis 80(suppl., 1): 89–109.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2016. What Properly Belongs to Grammar? A Response to LePore and Stone (2016).” Inquiry 59(2): 175–194.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2017. Contextualism and Semantic Minimalism.” in The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Yan Huang, pp. 21–46. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Bezuidenhout, Anne L. 2021. The Referential-Attributive Distinction.” in The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference, edited by Stephen Biggs and Heimir Geirsson, pp. 53–70. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
    Reimer, Marga and Bezuidenhout, Anne L., eds. 2004. Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Further References

    Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances – The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470754603.
    LePore, Ernest and Stone, Matthew. 2016. The Breadth of Semantics: Reply to Critics.” Inquiry 59(2): 195–206.