Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/garrett-d

Don Garrett (garrett-d)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Garrett, Don. 1981. Hume’s Self-Doubts about Personal Identity.” The Philosophical Review 90: 337–358.
    Garrett, Don. 1985. Priority and Separability in Hume’s Empiricism.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 67(3): 270–288.
    Garrett, Don. 1990a. Ethics IP5: Shared Attributes and the Basis of Spinoza’s Monism.” in Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Essays Presented to Jonathan Bennett, edited by Jan A. Cover and Mark A. Kulstad, pp. 69–108. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co.
    Garrett, Don. 1990b. ‘A Free Man Always Acts Honestly, Not Deceptively’: Freedom and the Good in Spinoza’s Ethics.” in Spinoza: Issues and Directions, edited by Edwin M. Curley and Pierre-François Moreau, pp. 221–238. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History n. 14. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    Garrett, Don. 1991. Spinoza’s Necessitarianism.” in God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, edited by Yirmiyahu Yovel, pp. 191–218. Leiden: E.J. Brill. Reprinted in Pereboom (1999, 103–130).
    Garrett, Don, ed. 1996a. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316156186.
    Garrett, Don. 1996b. Introduction.” in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, edited by Don Garrett, pp. 1–12. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316156186.
    Garrett, Don. 1996c. Spinoza’s Ethical Theory.” in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, edited by Don Garrett, pp. 267–314. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316156186.
    Garrett, Don. 1997. Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780195097214.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 1998. Ideas, Reason, and Skepticism: Replies to my Critics [Wilson (1998), Millican (1998) and Fogelin (1998)].” Hume Studies 24(1): 171–194.
    Garrett, Don. 1999. Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism.” in New Essays on the Rationalists, edited by Rocco J. Gennaro and Charles Huenemann, pp. 310–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195165411.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2000a. Owen on Humean Reason [on Owen (1999)].” Hume Studies 26(2): 291–303.
    Garrett, Don. 2000b. Critical Notice of Della Rocca (1996).” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61(1): 223–226.
    Garrett, Don. 2001a. Précis of Garrett (1997).” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62(1): 185–189.
    Garrett, Don. 2001b. Replies [to Owen (2001) and Brown (2001)].” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62(1): 205–215.
    Garrett, Don. 2002. Spinoza’s Conatus Argument.” in Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, edited by Olli Koistinen and John I. Biro, pp. 127–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/019512815X.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2003a. Locke on Personal Identity, Consciousness, and ‘Fatal Errors’ .” Philosophical Topics 31(1–2): 95–125.
    Garrett, Don. 2003b. Benedict de Spinoza, Ethics (1677): The Metaphysics of Blessedness.” in Classics in Western Philosophy. A Reader’s Guide, edited by Jorge J. E. Gracia, Gregory M. Reichberg, and Bernard N. Schumacher, pp. 245–259. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Garrett, Don. 2004a. ‘A Small Tincture of Pyrrhonism’: Skepticism and Naturalism in Hume’s Science of Man.” in Pyrrhonian Skepticism, edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, pp. 68–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195169727.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2004b. Philosophy and History in the History of Modern Philosophy.” in The Future for Philosophy, edited by Brian Leiter, pp. 44–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199247288.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2004c. Hume as a Man of Reason and Woman’s Philosopher.” in Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy, edited by Lilli K. Alanen and Charlotte Witt, pp. 171–192. The New Synthese Historical Library n. 55. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Garrett, Don. 2006a. Hume’s Naturalistic Theory of Representation.” Synthese 152(3): 301–319.
    Garrett, Don. 2006b. Hume’s Conclusion in ‘Conclusions of this Book’ .” in The Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise, edited by Saul Traiger, pp. 151–176. Blackwell Guides to Great Works. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470776377.
    Garrett, Don. 2007a. The First Motive to Justice: Hume’s Circle Argument Squared.” Hume Studies 33(2): 257–288.
    Garrett, Don. 2007b. Reasons to Act and Believe: Naturalism and Rational Justification in Hume’s Philosophical Project.” Philosophical Studies 132(1): 1–16.
    Garrett, Don. 2008a. Should Hume Have Been a Transcendental Idealist? in Kant and the Early Moderns, edited by Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse, pp. 193–208. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Garrett, Don. 2008b. Hume’s Theory of Ideas.” in A Companion to Hume, edited by Elizabeth S. Radcliffe, pp. 41–57. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9780470696583.
    Garrett, Don. 2008c. Representation and Consciousness in Spinoza’s Naturalistic Theory of the Imagination.” in Interpreting Spinoza. Critical Essays, edited by Charles Huenemann, pp. 4–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Garrett, Don. 2009a. Difficult times for Humean identity? [on Baxter (2007)].” Philosophical Studies 146(3): 435–443.
    Garrett, Don. 2009b. Spinoza on the Essence of the Human Body and the Part of the Mind That Is Eternal.” in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics, edited by Olli Koistinen, pp. 284–302. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Garrett, Don. 2009c. Hume.” in The Oxford Handbook of Causation, edited by Helen Beebee, Christopher R. Hitchcock, and Peter Menzies, pp. 73–91. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279739.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2010a. Spinoza’s Theory of Scientia Intuitiva.” in Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy: Seventeenth-Century Thinkers on Demonstrative Knowledge from First Principles, edited by Tom Sorell, G. A. John Rogers, and Jill Kraye, pp. 99–116. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 24. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Garrett, Don. 2010b. ‘Promising’ Ideas: Hobbes and Contract in Spinoza’s Political Philosophy.” in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise. A Critical Guide, edited by Yitzhak Y. Melamed and Michael A. Rosenthal, pp. 192–209. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Garrett, Don. 2012a. Rethinking Hume’s Second Thoughts about Personal Identity.” in The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding. Reflections on the Thought of Barry Stroud, edited by Jason Bridges, Niko Kolodny, and Wai-hung Wong, pp. 15–42. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381658.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2012b. A Reply on Spinoza’s Behalf.” in Spinoza and German Idealism, edited by Eckart Förster and Yitzhak Y. Melamed, pp. 248–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Garrett, Don. 2014. Review of Griffin (2013).” The Philosophical Review 123(2): 234–238.
    Garrett, Don. 2015. Hume. The Routledge Philosophers. London: Routledge.
    Garrett, Don. 2016a. Reason, Normativity, and Hume’s ‘Title Principle’ .” in The Oxford Handbook of Hume, edited by Paul Russell, pp. 32–53. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199742844.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2016b. Liberty and Suspension in Locke’s Theory of the Will.” in A Companion to Locke, edited by Matthew Stuart, pp. 260–278. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781118328705.
    Garrett, Don. 2017. The Indiscernibility of Identicals and the Transitivity of Identity in Spinoza’s Logic of the Attributes.” in Spinoza’s Ethics. A Critical Guide, edited by Yitzhak Y. Melamed, pp. 12–42. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316339213.
    Garrett, Don. 2018a. Necessity and Nature in Spinoza’s Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780195307771.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don. 2018b. Representation, Misrepresentation, and Error in Spinoza’s Philosophy of Mind.” in The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, edited by Michael Della Rocca, pp. 190–203. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Garrett, Don. 2020. Pyrrhonian Skepticism and Humean Skepticism.” in Epistemology After Sextus Empiricus, edited by Katja Maria Vogt and Justin Vlasits, pp. 213–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780190946302.001.0001.
    Garrett, Don and Barbanell, Edward, eds. 1997. Encyclopedia of Empiricism. Westport, Colorado: Greenwood Press.

Further References

    Baxter, Donald L. M. 2007. Hume’s Difficulty. Time and Identity in the Treatise. Routledge Studies in Eighteenth Century Philosophy n. 8. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203940259.
    Brown, Charlotte. 2001. Is the General Point of View the Moral Point of View? [on Garrett (1997)].” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62(1): 197–203.
    Della Rocca, Michael. 1996. Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Fogelin, Robert J. 1998. Garrett on the Consistency of Hume’s Philosophy [on Garrett (1997)].” Hume Studies 24(1): 161–169.
    Griffin, Michael V. 2013. Leibniz, God, and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Millican, Peter J. R. 1998. Hume on Reason and Induction: Epistemology or Cognitive Science? [on Garrett (1997)].” Hume Studies 24(1): 141–159.
    Owen, David. 1999. Hume’s Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0199252602.001.0001.
    Owen, David. 2001. Reason and Commitment [on Garrett (1997)].” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62(1): 191–196.
    Pereboom, Derk, ed. 1999. The Rationalists: Critical Essays on Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. Critical Essays on the Classics. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Wilson, Margaret Dauler. 1998. On Garrett’s Hume [on Garrett (1997)].” Hume Studies 24(1): 131–139.