Elaine M. Landry (landry)

Cité.e dans les articles suivants

Contributions à Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Brading, Katherine and Landry, Elaine M. 2006. “Scientific Structuralism: Presentation and Representation .” Philosophy of Science 73(5): 571–581, doi:10.1086/518327.
Landry, Elaine M. 2002. “Présentation du programme sémantique de Carnap dans le cadre de la théorie des catégories.” in Carnap aujourd’hui, edited by François Lepage, Michel Paquette, and François Rivenc, pp. 277–297. Collection Analytiques n. 14. Montréal: Bellarmin. Traduit par M. Paquette.
Landry, Elaine M. 2006a. “Intuition, Objectivity and Structure.” in Intuition and the Axiomatic Method, edited by Emily Carson and Renate Huber, pp. 133–156. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 70. Dordrecht: Springer.
Landry, Elaine M. 2006b. “Category Theory as a Framework for an in re Interpretation of Mathematical Structuralism.” in The Age of Alternative Logics. Assessing Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics Today, edited by Johan van Benthem, Gerhard Heinzmann, Manuel Rebuschi, and Henk Visser, pp. 163–180. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 3. Dordrecht: Springer.
Landry, Elaine M. 2011a. “How to Be a Structuralist All the Way Down.” Synthese 179(3): 435–454.
Landry, Elaine M. 2011b. “A Silly Answer to a Psillos Question.” in Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy: Vintage Enthusiasms. Essays in Honour of John L. Bell, edited by David DeVidi, Michael Hallett, and Peter Clark, pp. 361–380. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 75. Dordrecht: Springer.
Landry, Elaine M. 2012a. “Methodological Structural Realism.” in Structural Realism. Structure, Object, and Causality, edited by Elaine M. Landry and Dean P. Rickles, pp. 29–58. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 77. Dordrecht: Springer.
Landry, Elaine M. 2012b. “Recollection and the Mathematician’s Method in Plato’s Meno.” Philosophia Mathematica 20(2): 143–169.
Landry, Elaine M. 2013a. “Review of Pincock (2012).” Metascience 22(2): 254–260.
Landry, Elaine M. 2013b. “The Genetic versus the Axiomatic Method: Responding to Feferman 1977.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 6(1): 24–50.
Landry, Elaine M., ed. 2017a. Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198748991.001.0001.
Landry, Elaine M. 2017b. “Structural Realism and Category Mistakes.” in Categories for the Working Philosopher, edited by Elaine M. Landry, pp. 430–450. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198748991.001.0001.
Landry, Elaine M. and Marquis, Jean-Pierre. 2005. “Categories in Context: Historical, Foundational, and Philosophical.” Philosophia Mathematica 13(1): 1–43.
Landry, Elaine M. and Rickles, Dean P., eds. 2012. Structural Realism. Structure, Object, and Causality. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 77. Dordrecht: Springer.

Further References

Pincock, Christopher. 2012. Mathematics and Scientific Representation. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757107.001.0001.