Christopher Pincock (pincock)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Lapointe, Sandra and Pincock, Christopher, eds. 2017a. Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy. Innovations in Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lapointe, Sandra and Pincock, Christopher. 2017b. “Introduction.” in Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy, edited by Sandra Lapointe and Christopher Pincock, pp. 1–25. Innovations in Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mancosu, Paolo, Poggiolesi, Francesca and Pincock, Christopher. 2023. “Mathematical Explanation.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/mathematics-explanation/.
Pincock, Christopher. 2003. “Carnap and the Unity of Science: 1921-1928.” in Language, Truth and Knowledge. Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by Thomas Bonk, pp. 87–96. Vienne Circle Institute Library n. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pincock, Christopher. 2004a. “A New Perspective on the Problem of Applying Mathematics.” Philosophia Mathematica 12(2): 135–161.
Pincock, Christopher. 2004b. “History of Philosophical Analysis [Review of Soames (2003a, 2003b)].” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, New Series 24(2): 167–171.
Pincock, Christopher. 2005. “A Role for Mathematics in the Physical Sciences.” Noûs 41(2): 253–275, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00646.x.
Pincock, Christopher. 2006a. “Rejoinder to Soames (2004).” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, New Series 26(1): 77–86.
Pincock, Christopher. 2006b. “Richard Semon and Russell’s analysis of Mind.” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, New Series 26(2): 101–125.
Pincock, Christopher. 2008a. “Russell’s Last (and Best) Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment.” Mind 117(465): 107–140.
Pincock, Christopher. 2008b. “Carnap, Russell, and the External World.” in The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, edited by Michael Friedman and Richard Creath, pp. 106–128. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pincock, Christopher. 2009a. “Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.” in New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics, edited by Otávio Bueno and Øystein Linnebo, pp. 173–196. New Waves in Philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pincock, Christopher. 2009b. “Carnap’s Logical Structure of the World.” Philosophy Compass 4(6): 951–961.
Pincock, Christopher. 2009c. “From Sunspots to the Southern Oscillation: Confirming Models of Large-Scale Phenomena in Meteorology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40(1): 45–56.
Pincock, Christopher. 2010. “Accounting for the Unity of Experience in Dilthey, Rickert, Bradley and Ward.” in Historical Perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen, edited by Uljana Feest, pp. 187–206. Archimedes: New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology n. 21. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pincock, Christopher. 2011a. “Mathematical Structural Realism.” in Scientific Structuralism, edited by Alisa Bokulich and Peter Bokulich, pp. 67–80. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 281. Dordrecht: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9597-8.
Pincock, Christopher. 2011b. “Modeling Reality.” Synthese 180(1): 19–32.
Pincock, Christopher. 2011c. “Philosophy of Mathematics.” in The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by Steven French and Juha Saatsi, pp. 314–335. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Pincock, Christopher. 2012. Mathematics and Scientific Representation. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757107.001.0001.
Pincock, Christopher. 2013a. “Replies to Balaguer (2013; Landry 2013; Bangu 2013).” Metascience 22(2): 266–273.
Pincock, Christopher. 2013b. “On Glock (2008).” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2(2): 6–10.
Pincock, Christopher. 2014. “How to Avoid Inconsistent Idealizations.” Synthese 191(13): 2957–2972.
Pincock, Christopher. 2015a. “Abstract Explanations in Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66(4): 857–882.
Pincock, Christopher. 2015b. “The Unsolvability of the Quintic: A Case Study in Abstract Mathematical Explanation.” Philosophers’ Imprint 15(3).
Pincock, Christopher. 2016a. “Comments on Casullo (2012).” Philosophical Studies 173(6): 1687–1694.
Pincock, Christopher. 2016b. “Logical Empiricism.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, edited by Herman Cappelen, Tamar Szabó Gendler, and John Hawthorne, pp. 93–111. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.001.0001.
Pincock, Christopher. 2018. “Accommodating Explanatory Pluralism.” in Explanation Beyond Causation. Philosophical Perspectives on Non-Causal Explanations, edited by Alexander Reutlinger and Juha Saatsi, pp. 39–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198777946.001.0001.
Pincock, Christopher. 2021. “Mathematical Explanation Requires Mathematical Truth.” in Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Shamik Dasgupta, Ravit Dotan, and Brad Weslake, pp. 39–50. Current Controversies in Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Further References

Balaguer, Mark. 2013. “Review of Pincock (2012).” Metascience 22(2): 247–254.
Bangu, Sorin. 2013. “Review of Pincock (2012).” Metascience 22(2): 260–266.
Casullo, Albert. 2012. Essays on A Priori Knowledge and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777860.001.0001.
Glock, Hans-Johann. 2008. What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landry, Elaine M. 2013. “Review of Pincock (2012).” Metascience 22(2): 254–260.
Soames, Scott. 2003a. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume 1: The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Soames, Scott. 2003b. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume 2: The Age of Meaning. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Soames, Scott. 2004. “Reply to Pincock (2004b).” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, New Series 24(2): 172–177.