Martin Lenz (lenz-mart)
Contributi a Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Iribarren, Isabel and Lenz, Martin, eds. 2008a. Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry Their Function and Significance. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Iribarren, Isabel and Lenz, Martin. 2008b. “Introduction: The Role of Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry.” in Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry Their Function and Significance, edited by Isabel Iribarren and Martin Lenz, pp. 1–13. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Lenz, Martin. 2005. “Peculiar Perfection: Peter Abelard on Propositional Attitudes.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 43(4): 377–386.
Lenz, Martin. 2007. “Are Thoughts and Sentences Compositional? A Controversy between Abelard and a Pupil of Alberic on the Reconciliation of Ancient Theses on Mind and Language.” Vivarium 45(2–3): 169–188. Reprinted in Marenbon (2007, 39–58).
Lenz, Martin. 2008a. “Why is Thought Linguistic? Ockham’s Two Conceptions of the Intellect.” Vivarium 46(3): 302–317. Reprinted in Perler (2009, 80–95).
Lenz, Martin. 2008b. “Why Can’t Angels Think Properly? Ockham against Chatton and Aquinas.” in Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry Their Function and Significance, edited by Isabel Iribarren and Martin Lenz, pp. 155–169. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Lenz, Martin. 2010a. “John Locke: ‘Einleitung und Textpassagen’ .” in Ideen. Repräsentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit.1. Texte, edited by Dominik Perler and Johannes Haag, pp. 259–298. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lenz, Martin. 2010b. “John Locke: ‘Stellenkommentar’ .” in Ideen. Repräsentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit. 2. Kommentare, edited by Dominik Perler and Johannes Haag, pp. 253–263. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lenz, Martin. 2010c. “Lockes psychologische Logik der Ideen.” in Ideen. Repräsentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit. 2. Kommentare, edited by Dominik Perler and Johannes Haag, pp. 265–286. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lenz, Martin. 2010d. Lockes Sprachkonzeption. Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie n. 96. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lenz, Martin. 2012a. “Mental Language.” in The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy, edited by John Marenbon, pp. 363–383. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195379488.001.0001.
Lenz, Martin. 2012b. “Locke’s Theory of Ideas and the Myth of the Given.” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 12: 101–122.
Lenz, Martin. 2012c. “Intentionality without Objectivity? Spinoza’s Theory of Intentionality.” in Intentionality. Historical and Systematic Perspectives, edited by Alessandro Salice, pp. 29–58. Basic Philosophical Concepts. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2nrzhb6.
Lenz, Martin. 2013a. “Locke as a Social Externalist.” in Continuity and Innovation in Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Knowledge, Mind and Language, edited by John Marenbon. Proceedings of the British Academy n. 189. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197265499.001.0001.
Lenz, Martin. 2013b. “Ideas as Thick Beliefs: Spinoza on the Normativity of Ideas.” in Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy. Nature and Norms of Thought, edited by Martin Lenz and Anik Waldow, pp. 37–50. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 29. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lenz, Martin. 2016. “Is Locke’s Account of Personal Identity Really Subjectivist? [on Thiel (2011)].” Kant-Studien 107(3): 526–535.
Lenz, Martin. 2020. “Relativism in Early Modern Philosophy.” in The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism, edited by Martin Kusch, pp. 59–68. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9781351052306.
Lenz, Martin. 2022. Socializing Minds: Intersubjectivity in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780197613146.001.0001.
Further References
Marenbon, John, ed. 2007. The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Perler, Dominik, ed. 2009. Transformations of the Soul. Aristotelian Psychology 1250-1650. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Thiel, Udo. 2011. The Early Modern Subject. Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199542499.001.0001.