Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/phillips-i

Ian Phillips (phillips-i)

Mentioned on the following portal pages

Philosophers' Imprint

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    French, Craig and Phillips, Ian. 2020. Austerity and Illusion.” Philosophers' imprint 20(15).
    McCarthy, Andrew and Phillips, Ian. 2006. No New Argument Against the Existence Requirement [on Yagisawa (2005)].” Analysis 66(1): 39–44.
    Phillips, Ian. 2005. Experience and Intentional Content.” BPhil thesis, Oxford: University of Oxford.
    Phillips, Ian. 2007. Morgenbesser Cases and Closet Determinism.” Analysis 67(1): 42–49.
    Phillips, Ian. 2009. Rate Abuse: A Reply to Olson (2009).” Analysis 69(3): 503–505.
    Phillips, Ian. 2010. Perceiving Temporal Properties.” European Journal of Philosophy 18(2): 176–202.
    Phillips, Ian. 2011a. Stuck in the Closet: A Reply to Ahmed (2011).” Analysis 71(1): 86–91.
    Phillips, Ian. 2011b. Indiscriminability and Experience of Change.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61(245): 808–827.
    Phillips, Ian. 2011c. Attention and Iconic Memory.” in Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, edited by Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies, and Wayne Wu, pp. 204–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Phillips, Ian. 2012. Attention to the Passage of Time.” in Philosophical Perspectives 26: Philosophy of Mind, edited by John Hawthorne, pp. 277–308. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; Sons, Inc.
    Phillips, Ian. 2013a. Perceivinig the Passing of Time.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113(3): 225–252.
    Phillips, Ian. 2013b. Hearing and Hallucinating Silence.” in Hallucination. Philosophy and Psychology, edited by Fiona Macpherson and Dimitris Platchias, pp. 333–360. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262019200.001.0001.
    Phillips, Ian. 2014a. Breaking the Silence: Motion Silencing and Experience of Change.” Philosophical Studies 168(3): 693–707.
    Phillips, Ian. 2014b. Experience of and in Time.” Philosophy Compass 9(2): 131–144.
    Phillips, Ian. 2014c. Lack of Imagination: Individual Differences in Mental Imagery and the Significance of Consciousness.” in New Waves in Philosophy of Mind, edited by Mark Sprevak and Jesper Kallestrup, pp. 278–300. New Waves in Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Phillips, Ian. 2014d. Cetacean Semantics: A Reply to Sainsbury.” Analysis 74(3): 379–382.
    Phillips, Ian. 2016. Naı̈ve Realism and the Science of (Some) Illusions.” Philosophical Topics 44(2): 353–380.
    Phillips, Ian, ed. 2017a. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
    Phillips, Ian. 2017b. Introduction: The Significance of Temporal Experience.” in The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, pp. 1–16. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
    Phillips, Ian. 2018a. No More than Meets the Eye: Shadows as Pure Visibilia.” in Perceptual Ephemera, edited by Thomas Crowther and Clare Mac Cumhaill, pp. 172–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198722304.001.0001.
    Phillips, Ian. 2018b. Consciousness, Time, and Memory.” in The Routledge Handbook of Consciousness, edited by Rocco J. Gennaro, pp. 286–297. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
    Phillips, Ian. 2020. Object Files and Unconscious Perception: A Reply to Quilty-Dunn (2019).” Analysis 80(2): 293–301.
    Phillips, Ian and Block, Ned. 2017. Debate on Unconscious Perception.” in Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception, edited by Bence Nanay, pp. 165–192. Current Controversies in Philosophy. New York: Routledge.

Further References

    Ahmed, Arif. 2011. Out of the Closet.” Analysis 71(1): 77–86.
    Olson, Eric T. 2009. The Rate of Time’s Passage.” Analysis 69(1): 3–9, doi:10.1093/analys/ann001.
    Quilty-Dunn, Jake. 2019. Unconscious Perception and Phenomenal Coherence.” Analysis 79(3): 461–469.
    Yagisawa, Takashi. 2005. A New Argument against the Existence Requirement.” Analysis 65(1): 39–42.