Frederick Rauscher (rauscher-f)

Menzionato/a in queste pagine del portale

Contributi a Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Rauscher, Frederick. 1995. “Kant’s Conflation of Pure Practical Reason and Will.” in Proceedings of the 8th International Kant-Congress Memphis 1995, volume II.1, edited by Hoke Robinson, pp. 579–586. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press.
Rauscher, Frederick. 1996. “Pure Reason and the Moral Law: A Source of Kant’s Critical Philosophy.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13(2): 255–271.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2000. “Besprechung von Ertl (1998).” in Philosophie der Neuzeit: From Descartes to Kant, edited by Uwe Meixner and Albert Newen, pp. 247–252. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy n. 3. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2002. “Kant’s Moral Anti-Realism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40(4): 477–499.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2003. “Moral Realism and the Divine Essence in Hutcheson.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20(2): 165–181.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2005. “The Institutionalization of Reason.” Kantian Review 9: 95–104.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2007. “Kant’s Social and Political Philosophy.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2007/entries/kant-social-political/.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2010a. “The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason.” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Paul Guyer, pp. 290–309. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2010b. “Freedom and Reason in Groundwork III.” in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical Guide, edited by Jens Timmermann, pp. 203–223. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2012. “Kant’s Social and Political Philosophy.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/kant-social-political/.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2014. “The Second Step of the B-Deduction.” European Journal of Philosophy 22(3): 396–419.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2016a. Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781316105252.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2016b. “Kant’s Social and Political Philosophy.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/kant-social-political/.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2018a. “Moral Realism and the Inner Value of the World.” in Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity, edited by Kate A. Moran, pp. 155–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316421888.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2018b. “Naturalism in Kant’s Ethics: the Third Antinomy.” in Natur und Freiheit. Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant Kongresses, volume III, edited by Violetta L. Waibel, Margit Ruffing, and David Wagner, pp. 2069–2076. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2022. “Kant’s Social and Political Philosophy.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/kant-social-political/.

Further References

Ertl, Wolfgang. 1998. Kants Auflösung der “dritten Antinomie”: Zur Bedeutung des Schöpfungskonzepts für die Freiheitslehre. Freiburg i.Br.: Karl Alber.