Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/read-r

Rupert Read (read-r)

contact-rupert(at)rupertread.net

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Diese Zivilisation ist gescheitert

Gespräche über die Klimakrise und die Chance eines Neuanfangs
Rupert Read | almost 5 years

Bibliography

    Cook, Jon and Read, Rupert. 2010. “Wittgenstein and Literary Language.” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature, edited by Garry L. Hagberg and Walter Jost, pp. 467–490. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781444315592.
    Crary, Alice and Read, Rupert, eds. 2000. The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.
    Hutchinson, Phil and Read, Rupert. 2006. “An Elucidatory Interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Critique of Daniel D. Hutto’s and Marie McGinn’s Reading of Tractatus 6.54.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14(1): 1–29.
    Hutchinson, Phil and Read, Rupert. 2008. “Toward a Perspicuous Presentation of ‘Perspicuous Presentation’ .” Philosophical Investigations 31(2): 141–160.
    Hutchinson, Phil and Read, Rupert. 2013. “Practising Pragmatist-Wittgensteinianism.” in The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, edited by Alan Malachowski, pp. 159–188. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Read, Rupert. 1997. “The Career of ‘Internal Relations’ in Wittgenstein’s Thought.” Wittgenstein Studies 2.
    Read, Rupert. 2000. “In Closing: The New Antagonists of ‘the New Hume’; On the Relevance of Goodman and Wittgenstein to the New Hume Debate.” in The New Hume Debate, edited by Rupert Read and Kenneth A. Richman, pp. 167–197. London: Routledge.
    Read, Rupert. 2002. “Culture, Nature, Ecosystem (or Why Nature Can’t Be Naturalized).” in Feminist Interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein, edited by Naomi Scheman and Peg O’Connor, pp. 408–431. Rereading the Canon. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Read, Rupert. 2003a. “Against ‘Time-Slices’ .” Philosophical Investigations 26(1): 24–43.
    Read, Rupert. 2003b. “Time to Stop Trying to Provide an Account of Time.” Philosophy 78: 397–408.
    Read, Rupert. 2003c. “Kuhn: Le Wittgenstein des sciences?” Archives de Philosophie 66(3): 463–479.
    Read, Rupert. 2004. “Wittgenstein and Faulkner’s Reply: Reflections on and of Derangement.” in The Literary Wittgenstein, edited by John Gibson and Wolfgang Huemer, pp. 267–287. London: Routledge.
    Read, Rupert. 2005a. “Throwing Away ‘the Bedrock’ .” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 81–98.
    Read, Rupert. 2005b. “ ‘The First Shall be Last and the Last Shall be First …’: A New Reading of On Certainty 501.” in Readings of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty, edited by Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, pp. 302–321. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Read, Rupert. 2006. “A No-Theory? Against Hutto on Wittgenstein.” Philosophical Investigations 29(1): 73–81.
    Read, Rupert. 2007. Applying Wittgenstein. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. Edited by Laura Cook.
    Read, Rupert. 2009. “Extreme Aversive Emotions: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Dread.” in Emotions and Understanding. Wittgensteinian Perspectives, edited by Ylva Gustafsson, Camilla Kronqvist, and Michael McEachrane, pp. 221–234. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Read, Rupert. 2012. “Why There Cannot be Any Such Thing as ‘Time Travel’ .” Philosophical Investigations 35(2): 138–153.
    Read, Rupert. 2013. “On Philosophy’s (Lack of) Progress: From Plato to Wittgenstein (and Rawls).” in Wittgenstein and Plato. Connections, Comparisons and Contrasts, edited by Luigi Perissinotto and Begoña Ramón Cámara, pp. 249–280. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Read, Rupert. 2016. “Wittgenstein and the Illusion of ‘Progress’: On Real Politics and Real Philosophy in a World of Technocracy.” in The History of Philosophy, edited by Anthony O’Hear, pp. 265–284. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement n. 78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Read, Rupert and Deans, Rob. 2003. “ ‘Nothing is Shown’: A ‘Resolute’ Response to Mounce (2003), Emiliani (2003), Koethe (2003) and Vilhauer (2003).” Philosophical Investigations 26(3): 239–268.
    Read, Rupert and Deans, Rob. 2011. “The Possibility of a Resolutely Resolute Reading of the Tractatus.” in Beyond the Tractatus Wars. The New Wittgenstein Debate, edited by Rupert Read and Matthew A. Lavery, pp. 149–170. London: Routledge.
    Read, Rupert and Goodenough, Jerry, eds. 2005. Film as Philosophy. Essays on Cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Read, Rupert and Lavery, Matthew A., eds. 2011a. Beyond the Tractatus Wars. The New Wittgenstein Debate. London: Routledge.
    Read, Rupert and Lavery, Matthew A. 2011b. “Introduction.” in Beyond the Tractatus Wars. The New Wittgenstein Debate, edited by Rupert Read and Matthew A. Lavery, pp. 1–5. London: Routledge.
    Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth A., eds. 2000. The New Hume Debate. London: Routledge.
    Read, Rupert and Sharrock, Wes. 2002. “Thomas Kuhn’s Misunderstood Relation to Kripke-Putnam Essentialism.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33(1): 151–158.

Further References

    Emiliani, Alberto. 2003. “What Nonsense Might Do: The Metaphysical Eye Opens.” Philosophical Investigations 26(3): 205–229.
    Koethe, John. 2003. “On the ‘Resolute’ Reading of the Tractatus.” Philosophical Investigations 26(3): 187–204.
    Mounce, Howard O. 2003. “Reply to Read and Deans (2003).” Philosophical Investigations 26(3): 269–270.
    Vilhauer, Benjamin. 2003. “On a Tension in Diamond’s Account of Tractarian Nonsense.” Philosophical Investigations 26(3): 230–238.