Diese Seite auf DeutschCette page en françaisQuesta pagina in italiano
Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/weintraub-r

Ruth Weintraub (weintraub-r)

Email: weintrar(at)tauex.tau.ac.il

Mentioned on the following portal pages

Articles of Dialectica, Mixtures and Mass Terms, An Analysis of Fink's Argument in Favour of Normative Process-Requirements, Perceptual Learning, Categorical Perception, and Cognitive Permeation, Boghossian, Bellarmine, and Galileo, Perspectivity and Rationality of Perception

Cited in the following articles

The Dis-Unity of Humean Space

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

The Dis-Unity of Humean Space

Beta version. This is a page made for testing purposes. For the official version of the article, please visit to OJS webpage at https://dialectica.philosophie.ch/.
Ruth Weintraub | almost 4 years

Bibliography

    Weintraub, Ruth. 1987. “Dispositionalism and Decision.” Ratio 29: 591–596.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 1995. “Practical Solutions to the Surprise-Examination Paradox.” Ratio 7: 161–169.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 1996. “The Sceptical Life.” Dialectica 50(3): 225–234.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 1997a. The Sceptical Challenge. London: Routledge.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 1997b. “The Cartesian Circle and Two Forms of Scepticism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14(4): 365–377.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 1998. “The Spatiality of the Mental and the Mind-Body Problem.” Synthese 117(3): 409–417.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2001a. “The Lottery: A Paradox Regained and Resolved.” Synthese 129: 439–449.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2001b. “Logical Knowledge.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9(1): 3–18.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2002. “Hume’s Associations.” Hume Studies 28(2): 231–246.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2003a. “The Naturalistic Response to Scepticism.” Philosophy 78: 369–386.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2003b. “Verificationism Revisited.” Ratio 16(1): 83–98.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2003c. “A Non-Fideistic Reading of William James’s ‘The Will to Believe’ .” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20(1): 103–121.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2004a. “On Sharp Boundaries for Vague Terms.” Synthese 138(2): 233–245.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2004b. “Sleeping Beauty: A Simple Solution.” Analysis 64(1): 8–10.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2005. “A Humean Conundrum.” Hume Studies 31(2): 211–224.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2006. “What Descartes’ Demon Can Do and his Dream Cannot.” Theoria 72(4): 319–335.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2007a. “Desire as Belief, Lewis Notwithstanding.” Analysis 67(2): 116–122.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2007b. “Separability and Concept-Empiricism: Hume vs. Locke.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(4): 729–743, doi:10.1080/09608780701605010.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2007c. “Locke vs. Hume: Who Is the Better Concept-Empiricist?” Dialogue. Revue canadienne de philosophie / Canadian Philosophical Review 46(3): 481–500.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2008a. “How Probable is an Infinite Sequence of Heads? A Reply to Williamson (2007).” Analysis 68(3): 247–250.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2008b. “Skepticism about Induction.” in The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, edited by John Greco, pp. 129–148. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195183214.001.0001.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2008c. “A Problem for Hume’s Theory of Induction.” Hume Studies 34(2): 169–187.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2009. “The Doomsday Argument Revisited (a Stop in the Shooting-Room Included).” Polish Journal of Philosophy 3(2): 109–122.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2010. “Hume on Local Conjunction and the Soul.” in David Hume: Epistemology and Metaphysics, edited by Helen Beebee and Markus Schrenk, pp. 122–131. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy n. 13. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2011a. “Logic for Expressivists.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89(4): 601–616.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2011b. “A Solution to the Discursive Dilemma.” Philosophical Studies 152(2): 181–188.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2011c. “Humean Bodies.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 28(4): 373–387.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2012. “What Can We Learn from Buridan’s Ass?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42(3–4): 187–207.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2013a. “Can Steadfast Peer Disagreement Be Rational?” The Philosophical Quarterly 63(253): 740–759.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2013b. “Induction and Inference to the Best Explanation.” Philosophical Studies 166(1): 203–216.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2016. “The Problem of Induction Dissolved; but are We Better-Off?” American Philosophical Quarterly 53(1): 69–83.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2017. “Scepticism about Inference to the Best Explanation.” in Best Explanations. New Essays on Inference to the Best Explanation, edited by Kevin McCain and Ted Poston, pp. 188–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198746904.001.0001.
    Weintraub, Ruth. 2021. “The Dis-Unity of Humean Space.” Dialectica 75(1), doi:10.48106/dial.v75.i1.04.

Further References

    Williamson, Timothy. 2007. “How Probable is an Infinite Sequence of Heads?” Analysis 67(3): 173–180.