Janice L. Dowell (dowell)

Mentioned on the following portal pages

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Bronfman, Aaron and Dowell, Janice L. 2016. “Contextualism about Deontic Conditionals.” in Deontic Modality, edited by Nate Charlow and Matthew Chrisman, pp. 117–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717928.001.0001.
Bronfman, Aaron and Dowell, Janice L. 2018. “The Language of ‘Ought,’ and Reasons.” in The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, edited by Daniel Star, pp. 85–112. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001.
Dowell, Janice L. 2006a. “Formulating the Thesis of Physicalism: An Introduction.” Philosophical Studies 131(1): 1–23.
Dowell, Janice L. 2006b. “The Physical: Empirical, Not Metaphysical.” Philosophical Studies 131(1): 25–60.
Dowell, Janice L. 2008a. “A Priori Entailment and Conceptual Analysis: Making Room for Type-C Physicalism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86(1): 93–111.
Dowell, Janice L. 2008b. “Empirical Metaphysics: The Role of Intuitions about Possible Cases in Philosophy.” Philosophical Studies 140(1): 19–46.
Dowell, Janice L. 2008c. “Serious Metaphysics and the Vindication of Reductions.” Philosophical Studies 139(1): 91–110.
Dowell, Janice L. 2011. “A Flexible Contextualist Account of Epistemic Modals.” Philosophers' imprint 11(14).
Dowell, Janice L. 2012. “Contextualist Solutions to Three Puzzles about Practical Conditionals.” in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume VII, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, pp. 271–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653492.001.0001.
Dowell, Janice L. 2013. “Flexible Contextualism about Deontic Modals: A Puzzle about Information-Sensitivity.” Inquiry 56(2–3): 149–178.
Dowell, Janice L. 2016. “The Metaethical Insignificance of Moral Twin Earth.” in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume XI, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, pp. 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198784647.001.0001.
Dowell, Janice L. 2017a. “Contextualism About Epistemic Modals.” in The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, edited by Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa, pp. 388–399. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Dowell, Janice L. 2017b. “Truth-Assessment Methodology and the Case against the Relativist Case against Contextualism about Deontic Modals.” Res Philosophica 94(3): 325–357.
Dowell, Janice L. 2018. “Critical Notice of Silk (2016).” Analysis 78(3): 562–566.
Dowell, Janice L. 2020. “Finlay’s Methodology: Synthetic, Not Analytic [on Finlay (2014)].” Analysis 80(1): 102–110.
Dowell, Janice L. and Foran, Sean. 2007. “Methodology for Metametaphysics.” Philosophical Topics 35(1–2): 19–41.
Dowell, Janice L. and Sobel, David. 2017. “Advice for Non-Analytical Naturalists.” in Reading Parfit on What Matters, edited by Simon Kirchin, pp. 153–171. Reading Parfit on What Matters. London: Routledge.

Further References

Finlay, Stephen. 2014. Confusion of Tongues. A Theory of Normative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199347490.001.0001.
Silk, Alex. 2016. Discourse Contextualism. A Framework for Contextualist Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783923.001.0001.