Richard M. Gale (gale-rm)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Gale, Richard M. 1962. “Can a Prediction ‘Become True’?” Philosophical Studies 13(3): 43–46.
Gale, Richard M. 1968a. The Language of Time. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gale, Richard M., ed. 1968b. The Philosophy of Time. A Collection of Essays. London: MacMillan Publishing Co.
Gale, Richard M. 1969. “ ‘Here’ and ‘Now’ .” The Monist 53(3): 396–409. Reprinted in Freeman and Sellars (1971, 72–85).
Gale, Richard M. 1976. Negation and Non-Being. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series n. 10. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
Gale, Richard M. 1988. “Freedom versus Unsurpassable Greatness.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23(2): 65–75.
Gale, Richard M. 1991a. On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 1991b. “Pragmatism versus Mysticism: The Divided Self of William James.” in Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion, edited by James E. Tomberlin, pp. 241–286. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Co.
Gale, Richard M. 1991c. “Becoming.” in Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology, edited by Hans Burkhardt and Barry Smith. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language n. 2. München: Philosophia Verlag.
Gale, Richard M. 1994. “Swinburne’s Argument from Religious Experience.” in Reason and the Christian Religion: Essays in Honor of Richard Swinburne, edited by Alan G. Padgett, pp. 39–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 1996. “Some Difficulties in Theistic Treatments of Evil.” in The Evidential Argument from Evil, edited by Daniel Howard-Snyder, pp. 206–218. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 1997. “John Dewey’s Naturalization of William James.” in The Cambridge Companion to William James, edited by Ruth Anna Putnam, pp. 49–68. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 1998. “William James’s Ethics of Prometheanism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15(2): 245–269.
Gale, Richard M. 1999. “A New Argument for the Existence of God: One That Works, Well, Sort of.” in The Rationality of Theism, edited by Godehard Brüntrup and Ronald K. Tacelli, pp. 85–103. Studies in Philosophy and Religion n. 19. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gale, Richard M., ed. 2002a. The Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics. Blackwell Philosophy Guides. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470998984.
Gale, Richard M. 2002b. “Time, Temporality, and Paradox.” in The Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics, edited by Richard M. Gale, pp. 66–86. Blackwell Philosophy Guides. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470998984.
Gale, Richard M. 2004a. “Why Traditional Cosmological Arguments Don’t Work, and a Sketch of a New One that Does.” in Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Religion, edited by Michael L. Peterson and Raymond J. VanArragon, pp. 114–129. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy n. 1. Boston, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Gale, Richard M. 2004b. “William James and John Dewey: The Odd Couple.” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28: The American Philosophers, edited by Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein, pp. 149–167. Boston, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Gale, Richard M. 2005. “John Dewey’s ‘Time and Individuality’ .” The Modern Schoolman 82: 175–192.
Gale, Richard M. 2007a. “Evil and Alvin Plantinga.” in Alvin Plantinga, edited by Deane-Peter Baker, pp. 48–70. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 2007b. “The Failure of Classical Theistic Arguments.” in The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, edited by Michael Martin, pp. 86–101. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 2009. “William James.” in The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 5: Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Religion, edited by Graham Oppy and Nick N. Trakakis, pp. 13–26. London: Routledge.
Gale, Richard M. 2010. “The Naturalism of John Dewey.” in The Cambridge Companion to Dewey, edited by Molly Cochran, pp. 55–79. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 2012. “More Modest Ontological Argument [sic].” in Ontological Proofs Today, edited by Mirosław Szatkowski, pp. 165–178. Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 50. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Gale, Richard M. 2013a. “Evil as Evidence Against God.” in Debating Christian Theism, edited by James Porter Moreland, Khaldoun A. Sweis, and Chad Meister, pp. 197–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gale, Richard M. 2013b. “The Problem of Evil.” in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Chad Meister and Paul Copan, pp. 457–467. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge. First edition: Meister and Copan (2007).
Gale, Richard M. 2016. On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge Philosophy Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781316499054.
Gale, Richard M., McGee, C. Douglas and Tillman, Frank A. 1964. “Ryle on ‘Use,’ ‘Usage,’ and ‘Utility’ .” Philosophical Studies 15(4): 57–60.
Gale, Richard M. and Pruss, Alexander R. 1999. “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35(4): 461–476.
Gale, Richard M. and Pruss, Alexander R. 2002. “A Response to Oppy (2000) and to Davey and Clifton (2001).” Religious Studies 38(1): 89–99.
Gale, Richard M. and Thalberg, Irving. 1965. “The Generality of Predictions.” The Journal of Philosophy 62(8): 195–210.
Pruss, Alexander R. and Gale, Richard M. 2003. “A Response to Almeida and Judisch (2002).” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53(2): 65–72.
Pruss, Alexander R. and Gale, Richard M. 2005. “Cosmological and Design Argument.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, edited by William J. Wainwright, pp. 116–137. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195138090.001.0001.

Further References

Almeida, Michael J. and Judisch, Neal D. 2002. “A New Cosmological Argument Undone.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51(1): 55–64.
Davey, Kevin and Clifton, Robert K. 2001. “Insufficent Reason in the ‘New Cosmological Argument’ [on Gale and Pruss (1999)].” Religious Studies 37(4): 485–490.
Freeman, Eugene and Sellars, Wilfrid, eds. 1971. Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Time. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co.
Oppy, Graham. 2000. “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument’ [on Gale and Pruss (1999)].” Religious Studies 36(3): 345–353.