Graham Oppy (oppy)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Easwaran, Kenny, Hájek, Alan, Mancosu, Paolo and Oppy, Graham. 2023. “Infinity.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/infinity/.
Handfield, Toby, Twardy, Charles R., Korb, Kevin B. and Oppy, Graham. 2008. “The Metaphysics of Causal Models: Where’s the Biff?” Erkenntnis 68(2): 149–168.
Hawthorne, John and Oppy, Graham. 1997. “Minimalism and Truth.” Noûs 31(2): 170–196.
Jackson, Frank, Menzies, Peter and Oppy, Graham. 1994. “The Two Envelope ‘Paradox’ .” Analysis 54(1): 43–45.
Jackson, Frank, Oppy, Graham and Smith, Michael A. 1992. “In Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism.” Economics and Philosophy 8(1): 1–21. Reprinted in Jackson, Pettit and Smith (2004, 163–185).
Jackson, Frank, Oppy, Graham and Smith, Michael A. 1994. “Minimalism and Truth-Aptness.” Mind 103: 287–302. Reprinted in Jackson, Pettit and Smith (2004, 233–251).
Oppy, Graham. 1987. “Williamson and the Contingent A Priori.” Analysis 47: 188–193.
Oppy, Graham. 1991a. “Craig, Mackie, and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 27(2): 189–197.
Oppy, Graham. 1991b. “On Rescher on Pascal’s Wager.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30(3): 159–168.
Oppy, Graham. 1994. “Weak Agnosticism Defended.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36(3): 147–167.
Oppy, Graham. 1995a. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 1995b. “Williams on Kaplan on the Contingent Analytic.” Ratio 7: 189–192.
Oppy, Graham. 1996a. “Pascal’s Wager Is a Possible Bet (But Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40(2): 101–116.
Oppy, Graham. 1996b. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall1997/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham. 1997a. “Countable Fusion Not yet Proven Guilty: It May Be the Whiteheadian Account of Space Whatdunnit.” Analysis 57: 249–253.
Oppy, Graham. 1997b. “Pantheism, Quantification and Mereology.” The Monist 80(2): 320–336.
Oppy, Graham. 2000a. “Humean Supervenience?” Philosophical Studies 101(1): 77–105.
Oppy, Graham. 2000b. “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument’ [on Gale and Pruss (1999)].” Religious Studies 36(3): 345–353.
Oppy, Graham. 2001. “Time, Successive Addition, and Kalām Cosmological Arguments.” Philosophia Christi 3(1): 181–192.
Oppy, Graham. 2002a. “Arguing about the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philo 5(1): 34–61.
Oppy, Graham. 2002b. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham. 2003. “From the Tristram Shandy Paradox to the Christmas Shandy Paradox: A Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 3: 1–14.
Oppy, Graham. 2004a. “Le nominalisme austère de la ressemblance.” in La structure du monde: objets, propriétés, états de choses. Renouveau de la métaphysique dans l’école australienne de philosophie, edited by Jean-Maurice Monnoyer, pp. 609–632. Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage. Paris: Librairie philosophique Jean Vrin.
Oppy, Graham. 2004b. “Can we Describe Possible Circumstances in Which we Would Have Most Reason to Believe That Time is Two-Dimensional?” Ratio 17(1).
Oppy, Graham. 2004c. “Facing Facts?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82(4): 621–643.
Oppy, Graham. 2004d. “Arguments from Moral Evil.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56(2): 59–87.
Oppy, Graham. 2005a. “Omnipotence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71(1): 58–84.
Oppy, Graham. 2005b. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham. 2006a. Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2006b. Arguing about Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2007a. “Natural Theology.” in Alvin Plantinga, edited by Deane-Peter Baker, pp. 15–47. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2007b. “Norms of Assertion.” in Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language, edited by Dirk Greimann and Geo Siegwart, pp. 226–249. Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy n. 6. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham. 2007c. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2007/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham. 2008a. “Higher-Order Ontological Arguments.” Philosophy Compass 3(5): 1066–1078.
Oppy, Graham. 2008b. “Review of Forrest (2007).” Dialectica 62(4): 549–553.
Oppy, Graham. 2009a. “Gods.” in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, volume II, edited by Jonathan L. Kvanvig, pp. 231–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2009b. “Cosmological Arguments.” Noûs 43(1): 31–48.
Oppy, Graham. 2009c. “What the Problem with ‘Russell’ Isn’t.” New Blackfriars 90(1030): 680–686.
Oppy, Graham. 2010a. “Nagel on Religion, Politics and Humanity.” Analysis 70(3): 562–567.
Oppy, Graham. 2010b. “The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel (review).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48(2): 243–245.
Oppy, Graham. 2010c. “Disagreement.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68(1): 183–199.
Oppy, Graham. 2010d. “Epistemological Foundations for Koons’ Cosmological Argument?” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2(1): 107–125.
Oppy, Graham. 2010e. “The Evidential Problem of Evil.” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Religion, edited by R. Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, and Philip L. Quinn, 2nd ed., pp. 500–508. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Oppy, Graham. 2011a. “Objection to a Simplified Ontological Argument.” Analysis 71(1): 104–108.
Oppy, Graham. 2011b. “On Behalf of the Fool [Reply to Matthews and Baker (2011)].” Analysis 71(2): 304–306.
Oppy, Graham. 2011c. “O’Connor’s Cosmological Argument.” in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, volume III, edited by Jonathan L. Kvanvig, pp. 166–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603213.001.0001.
Oppy, Graham. 2011d. “Critical Notice of Moreland (2008).” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3(1): 193–212.
Oppy, Graham. 2011e. “Perfection, Near-Perfection, Maximality, and Anselmian Theism.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69(2): 119–138.
Oppy, Graham. 2011f. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham. 2012a. “God.” in The Continuum Companion to Metaphysics, edited by Neil A. Manson and Robert Barnard, pp. 245–267. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2012b. “Arguments for the Existence of God.” in The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy, edited by John Marenbon, pp. 687–704. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195379488.001.0001.
Oppy, Graham. 2012c. “Maydole on Ontological Arguments.” in Ontological Proofs Today, edited by Mirosław Szatkowski, pp. 445–468. Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 50. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Oppy, Graham. 2012d. “Response to Maydole (2012).” in Ontological Proofs Today, edited by Mirosław Szatkowski, pp. 487–500. Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 50. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Oppy, Graham. 2012e. “Pruss, Motivational Centrality, and Probabilities Attached to Possibility Premises in Modal Ontological Arguments.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4(2): 65–85.
Oppy, Graham. 2013a. The Best Argument against God. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oppy, Graham. 2013b. “Lowe on ‘The Ontological Argument’ [on Lowe (2013)].” in Debating Christian Theism, edited by James Porter Moreland, Khaldoun A. Sweis, and Chad Meister, pp. 72–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2013c. “Consciousness, Theism, and Naturalism.” in Debating Christian Theism, edited by James Porter Moreland, Khaldoun A. Sweis, and Chad Meister, pp. 131–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2013d. “Ultimate Naturalistic Causal Explanations.” in The Puzzle of Existence. Why Is There Something Rather than Nothing?, edited by Tyron Craig Goldschmidt, pp. 46–63. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics n. 6. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham. 2013e. “Western Philosophy.” in The Routledge Companion to Theism, edited by R. Charles Taliaferro, Victoria S. Harrison, and Stewart C. Goetz, pp. 11–22. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham. 2014a. Reinventing Philosophy of Religion. An Opinionated Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oppy, Graham. 2014b. Describing Gods. An Investigation of Divine Attributes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2014c. “Response to Yandell (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 44–45. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014d. “Response to Gould and Davis (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 72–74. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014e. “Response to Welty (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 104–106. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014f. “Response to Craig (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 134–136. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014g. “Response to Shalkowski (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 162–164. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014h. “Abstract Objects? Who Cares!” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 169–181. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014i. “Response to Critics [Yandell (2014b), Gould and Davis (2014b), Welty (2014b), Craig (2014b), Shalkowski (2014b)].” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 192–196. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014j. “Philosophers in Schools: 2000s.” in History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand, pp. 291–325. Dordrecht: Springer.
Oppy, Graham. 2014k. “Leftow on God and Necessity [on Leftow (2012)].” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6(3): 5–16.
Oppy, Graham, ed. 2015a. The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham. 2015b. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham. 2016a. “On Second-Order Religion, Agatheism and Naturalism. A Reply to Thornhill-Miller and Millican (2015) and Salamon (2015).” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8(3): 257–272.
Oppy, Graham. 2016b. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham. 2017a. “Rationality and Worldview.” in Renewing Philosophy of Religion. Exploratory Essays, edited by Paul Draper and J. L. Schellenberg, pp. 174–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198738909.001.0001.
Oppy, Graham. 2017b. “Against Idealism.” in Idealism. New Essays in Metaphysics, edited by Tyron Craig Goldschmidt and Kenneth L. Pearce, pp. 50–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198746973.001.0001.
Oppy, Graham, ed. 2018. Ontological Arguments. Classic Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316402443.
Oppy, Graham, ed. 2019a. A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781119119302.
Oppy, Graham. 2019b. “Introduction.” in A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy, edited by Graham Oppy, pp. 1–12. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781119119302.
Oppy, Graham. 2019c. “Review of Benton, Hawthorne and Rabinowitz (2018).” Analysis 79(2): 381–384.
Oppy, Graham. 2019d. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham and Dowe, David L. 2003. “The Turing Test.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2003/entries/turing-test/.
Oppy, Graham and Dowe, David L. 2005. “The Turing Test.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/turing-test/.
Oppy, Graham and Dowe, David L. 2011. “The Turing Test.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/turing-test/.
Oppy, Graham and Dowe, David L. 2016. “The Turing Test.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/turing-test/.
Oppy, Graham and Dowe, David L. 2020. “The Turing Test.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/turing-test/.
Oppy, Graham and Dowe, David L. 2021. “The Turing Test.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/turing-test/.
Oppy, Graham, Hájek, Alan, Easwaran, Kenny and Mancosu, Paolo. 2021. “Infinity.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/infinity/.
Oppy, Graham, Rasmussen, Joshua and Schmid, Joseph. 2024. “Ontological Arguments.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/ontological-arguments/.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N., eds. 2009a. The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 1: Ancient Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N., eds. 2009b. The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 2: Early Modern Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N., eds. 2009c. The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 3: Medieval Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N., eds. 2009d. The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 4: Nineteenth-Century Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N., eds. 2009e. The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 5: Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N. 2009f. “Late-Twentieth-Century Atheism.” in The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Volume 5: Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Religion, edited by Graham Oppy and Nick N. Trakakis, pp. 301–312. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N. 2014a. History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht: Springer.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N. 2014b. History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. vol. II. Dordrecht: Springer.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N. 2014c. “Introduction.” in History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand, pp. 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer.
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N., eds. 2017. Interreligious Philosophical Dialogues, Volume 1. London: Routledge.
Oppy, Graham, Trakakis, Nick N., Burns, Lynda, Gardner, Steven and Leigh, Fiona, eds. 2010. A Companion to Philosophy in Australia & New Zealand. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.

Further References

Benton, Matthew A., Hawthorne, John and Rabinowitz, Dani, eds. 2018. Knowledge, Belief, and God. New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198798705.001.0001.
Craig, William Lane. 2014a. “Anti-Platonism.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 113–126. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2014b. “Response to Oppy (2014h).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 187–188. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Forrest, Peter. 2007. Developmental Theism: From Pure Will to Unbounded Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214587.001.0001.
Gale, Richard M. and Pruss, Alexander R. 1999. “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35(4): 461–476.
Gould, Paul M. and Davis, Richard Brian. 2014a. “Response to Yandell (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 36–37. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gould, Paul M. and Davis, Richard Brian. 2014b. “Response to Oppy (2014h).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 184–185. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Jackson, Frank, Pettit, Philip and Smith, Michael A., eds. 2004. Mind, Morality, and Explanation. Selected Collaborations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leftow, Brian. 2012. God and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263356.001.0001.
Lowe, Edward Jonathan. 2013. “A Modal Version oft the Ontological Argument.” in Debating Christian Theism, edited by James Porter Moreland, Khaldoun A. Sweis, and Chad Meister, pp. 61–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthews, Gareth B. and Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2011. “Reply to Oppy’s Fool [Oppy (2011a)].” Analysis 71(2): 303–304.
Maydole, Robert E. 2012. “Ontological Arguments Redux [on Oppy (2012c)].” in Ontological Proofs Today, edited by Mirosław Szatkowski, pp. 469–486. Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 50. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Moreland, James Porter. 2008. Consciousness and the Existence of God. A Theistic Argument. Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion n. 4. London: Routledge.
Salamon, Janusz. 2015. “Atheism and Agatheism in the Global Ethical Discourse: Reply to Thornhill-Miller and Millican (2015).” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7(4): 197–245.
Shalkowski, Scott A. 2014a. “God with or without Abstract Objects.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 143–154. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Shalkowski, Scott A. 2014b. “Response to Oppy (2014h).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 189–191. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Thornhill-Miller, Branden and Millican, Peter J. R. 2015. “The Common-Core/Diversity Dilemma: Revisions of Humean Thought, New Empirical Research, and the Limits of Rational Religious Belief.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7(1): 1–49.
Welty, Greg. 2014a. “Theistic Conceptual Realism.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 81–96. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Welty, Greg. 2014b. “Response to Oppy (2014h).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 186. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Yandell, Keith E. 2014a. “God and Propositions.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 21–35. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Yandell, Keith E. 2014b. “Response to Oppy (2014h).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 182–183. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.