Mary Leng (leng)
Contributi a Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Leng, Mary. 2002a. “Mathematical Practice as a Guide to Ontology: Evaluating Quinean Platonism by its Consequences for Theory Choice.” Logique et Analyse 45(179–180): 235–248.
Leng, Mary. 2002b. “Phenomenology and Mathematical Practice.” Philosophia Mathematica 10(1): 3–14.
Leng, Mary. 2005. “Revolutionary Fictionalism: A Call to Arms.” Philosophia Mathematica 13(3): 277–293.
Leng, Mary. 2007a. “Introduction.” in Mathematical Knowledge, edited by Mary Leng, Alexander C. Paseau, and Michael D. Potter, pp. 1–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199228249.001.0001.
Leng, Mary. 2007b. “What’s there to know?” in Mathematical Knowledge, edited by Mary Leng, Alexander C. Paseau, and Michael D. Potter, pp. 84–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199228249.001.0001.
Leng, Mary. 2009. “ ‘Algebraic’ Approaches to Mathematics.” in New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics, edited by Otávio Bueno and Øystein Linnebo, pp. 117–136. New Waves in Philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Leng, Mary. 2010. Mathematics and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280797.001.0001.
Leng, Mary. 2011a. “Comment [on Polkinghorne (2011)].” in Meaning in Mathematics, edited by John C. Polkinghorne, pp. 35–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leng, Mary. 2011b. “Creation and Discovery in Mathematics.” in Meaning in Mathematics, edited by John C. Polkinghorne, pp. 61–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leng, Mary. 2012. “Taking it Easy: A Response to Colyvan (2010).” Mind 121(484): 983–995.
Leng, Mary. 2014. “Mathematics and Logic.” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Philosophy, edited by Barry Dainton and Howard Robinson, pp. 172–200. Bloomsbury Companions. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Leng, Mary. 2016a. “Critical Review of Maddy (2013).” The Philosophical Quarterly 66(265): 823–832.
Leng, Mary. 2016b. “Truth, Fiction, and Stipulation.” in Truth, Objects, Infinity. New Perspectives on the Philosophy of Paul Benacerraf, edited by Fabrice Pataut, pp. 147–158. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 28. Cham: Springer.
Leng, Mary. 2016c. “Naturalism and Placement, or, What should a Good Quinean Say about Mathematical and Moral Truth?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116(3): 237–260.
Leng, Mary. 2016d. “Taking Morality Mathematically: Enoch’s Indispensability Argument.” in Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability, edited by Uri D. Leibowitz and Neil Sinclair, pp. 204–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778592.001.0001.
Leng, Mary. 2017. “Mathematical Realism and Naturalism.” in The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, edited by Juha Saatsi, pp. 407–418. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203712498.
Leng, Mary. 2019. “Debunking, Supervenience, and Hume’s Principle.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49(8): 1083–1103.
Leng, Mary. 2020. “Is there a Fact of the Matter About the Existence of Abstract Objects?” in Abstract Objects: For and Against, edited by José L. Falguera and Concha Martı́nez-Vidal, pp. 111–132. Synthese Library n. 422. Cham: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38242-1.
Leng, Mary. 2021. “Mathematical Explanation Doesn’t Require Mathematical Truth.” in Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Shamik Dasgupta, Ravit Dotan, and Brad Weslake, pp. 51–59. Current Controversies in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Leng, Mary, Paseau, Alexander C. and Potter, Michael D., eds. 2007. Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199228249.001.0001.
Further References
Colyvan, Mark. 2010. “There is no Easy Road to Nominalism.” Mind 119(474): 285–306.
Maddy, Penelope. 2013. Defending the Axioms: On the Philosophical Foundations of Set Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596188.001.0001.
Polkinghorne, John C. 2011. “Mathematical Reality.” in Meaning in Mathematics, edited by John C. Polkinghorne, pp. 27–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.