Henry Prakken (prakken)

Contributi a Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Amgoud, Leila, Bodenstaff, Lianne, Caminada, Martin, McBurney, Peter, Parsons, Simon, Prakken, Henry, Veenen, Jelle van and Vreeswijk, Gerard A. W. 2006. “Final Review and Report on Formal Argumentation System.” Toulouse: Université Toulouse III, Paul Sabatier. ASPIC, Project N 002307.
Atkinson, Katie, Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M., Prakken, Henry and Wyner, Adam Zachary. 2013. “Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning About Factors with Dimensions.” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 259: 39–48, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-39.
Atkinson, Katie, Prakken, Henry and Wyner, Adam Zachary, eds. 2013. From Knowledge Representation to Argumentation in AI, Law and Policy Making. A Festschrift in Honour of Trevor Bench-Capon on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Tributes n. 21. London: King’s College Publications.
Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M. and Prakken, Henry. 2010a. “Using Argument Schemes for Hypothetical Reasoning in Law.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 18(2): 153–174, doi:10.1007/s10506-010-9094-8.
Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M. and Prakken, Henry. 2010b. “A Lightweight Formal Model of Two-Phase Democratic Deliberation.” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 223: 27–36, doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-682-9-27.
Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M., Prakken, Henry and Visser, Wietske. 2011. “Argument Schemes for Two-Phase Democratic Deliberation.” in ICAIL 2011. Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Proceedings from the Conference June 6-10, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania), edited by Kevin D. Ashley, pp. 21–30. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, doi:10.1145/2018358.2018361.
Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M., Prakken, Henry, Wyner, Adam Zachary and Atkinson, Katie. 2013. “Argument Schemes for Reasoning with Legal Cases Using Values.” in ICAIL 2013. Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Proceedings from the Conference June 10-14, Rome), edited by Enrico Francesconi, pp. 13–22. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/2514601.
Besnard, Philippe, Garcia, Alejandro, Hunter, Anthony, Modgil, Sanjay, Prakken, Henry, Simari, Guillermo R. and Toni, Frencesca. 2014. “Introduction to Structured Argumentation.” Argument and Computation 5(1): 1–4, doi:10.1080/19462166.2013.869764.
Garcı́a, Alejandro J., Prakken, Henry and Simari, Guillermo R. 2020. “A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of shape ASPIC+ and shape DeLP.” Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 20(3): 358–390, doi:10.1017/S1471068419000437.
van Gijzel, Bas and Prakken, Henry. 2012. “Relating Carneades with Abstract Argumentation via the shape Aspic+ Framework for Structured Argumentation.” Argument and Computation 3(1): 21–47, doi:10.1080/19462166.2012.661766.
Gordon, Thomas F., Prakken, Henry and Walton, Douglas N. 2007. “The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof.” Artificial Intelligence 171(10–15): 875–896, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.010.
McNamara, Paul and Prakken, Henry, eds. 1999a. Norms, Logics and Information Systems: New Studies in Deontic Logic and Computer Science. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and its Applications. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
McNamara, Paul and Prakken, Henry. 1999b. “Introduction.” in Norms, Logics and Information Systems: New Studies in Deontic Logic and Computer Science, edited by Paul McNamara and Henry Prakken, pp. 1–14. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and its Applications. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Modgil, Sanjay and Prakken, Henry. 2013. “A General Account of Argumentation with Preferences.” Artificial Intelligence 195(1): 361–397, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008.
Modgil, Sanjay and Prakken, Henry. 2014. “The shape Aspic+ Framework for Structured Argumentation: A Tutorial.” Argument and Computation 5(1): 31–62, doi:10.1080/19462166.2013.869766.
Prakken, Henry. 1996. “Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Logic.” Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic 57(1): 73–90.
Prakken, Henry. 1997. Logical Tools for Modeling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Law and Philosophy Library n. 32. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Prakken, Henry. 2002. “Incomplete Arguments in Legal Discourse: A Case Study.” in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference, edited by Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Aspassia Daskalopulu, and Radboud G. F. Winkels, pp. 93–102. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Prakken, Henry. 2010a. “An Abstract Framework for Argumentation with Structured Arguments.” Argument and Computation 1(2): 93–124, doi:10.1080/19462160903564592.
Prakken, Henry. 2010b. “On the Nature of Argument Schemes.” in Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation. An Examination of Douglas Walton’s Theories of Reasoning, edited by Chris Reed and Christopher W. Tindale, pp. 1–21. Tributes n. 12. London: King’s College Publications.
Prakken, Henry. 2012a. “Formalising a Legal Opinion on a Legislative Proposal in the shape Aspic+ Framework.” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 250: 119–128, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-167-0-119.
Prakken, Henry. 2012b. “Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a Framework for Argumentation with Structured Arguments and Dungean Semantics.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 20(1): 57–82, doi:10.1007/s10506-012-9117-8.
Prakken, Henry. 2015. “Formalising Debates About Law-Making Proposals as Practical Reasoning.” in Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, edited by Michał Araszkiewicz and Krzysztof Płeszka, pp. 301–321. Cham: Springer Nature.
Prakken, Henry. 2017a. “Argument Schemes for Discussion Bayesian Modellings of Complex Criminal Cases.” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 302: 69–78, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-838-9-69.
Prakken, Henry. 2017b. “Logics of Argumentation and the Law.” in Law and the New Logics, edited by H. Patrick Glenn and Lionel D. Smith, pp. 3–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316227329.
Prakken, Henry. 2019. “Modelling Accrual of Arguments in shape Aspic+.” in ICAIL 2019. Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Proceedings from the Conference June 17-21, 2019, Montréal (Québec), Canada, edited by Floris Bex, pp. 103–112. New York: The Association for Computing Machinery Press, doi:10.1145/3322640.3326703.
Prakken, Henry. 2020. “An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case.” Topics in Cognitive Science 12(4): 1068–1091, doi:10.1111/tops.12418.
Prakken, Henry and Modgil, Sanjay. 2012. “Clarifying Some Misconceptions on the shape Aspic+ Framework.” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245(1): 442–453, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-442.
Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni. 1996. “A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 4: 331–368.
Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni. 1997a. “Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game.” in (ICAIL-97) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: ACM Press.
Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni. 1997b. “Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities.” Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7: 25–75.
Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni. 2002. “The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey.” in Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II, edited by Antonis C. Kakas and Fariba Sadri, pp. 342–380. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence n. 2408. Berlin: Springer.
Prakken, Henry and Sergot, Marek J. 1996. “Contrary-to-Duty Obligations.” Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic 57(1): 91–115.
Prakken, Henry and Sergot, Marek J. 1997. “Dyadic Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duty Obligation.” in Defeasible Deontic Logic, edited by Donald L. Nute, pp. 223–262. Synthese Library n. 263. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Prakken, Henry and Vreeswijk, Gerard A. W. 2001. “Logics for Defeasible Argumentation.” in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume IV, edited by Dov M. Gabbay and Franz Guenthner, 2nd ed., pp. 219–318. Dordrecht: Springer.
Prakken, Henry, Wyner, Adam Zachary, Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M. and Atkinson, Katie. 2015. “A Formalization of Argument Schemes for Case-Based Reasoning in Aspic+.” Journal of Logic and Computation 25(5): 1141–1166, doi:10.1093/logcom/ext010.