Nathan Rotenstreich (rotenstreich)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Aaron, Richard Ithamar, Rotenstreich, Nathan, Passmore, John A., Mercier, André, Russell, Leonard J. and Moreau, Joseph. 1961. “Discussion sur Hersch (1961) et Marias (1961).” Dialectica 15(57–58): 253–257.
Berlin, Isaiah, Hampshire, Stuart, Black, Max, Ricœur, Paul, Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Polin, Raymond, Davidson, Donald and Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1978. “Panel Discussion: Is a Philosophy of History Possible?” in Philosophy of History and Action. Papers Presented at the First Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter, edited by Yirmiyahu Yovel, pp. 219–240. Philosophical Studies Series n. 11. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1956. “Kant’s Schematism in its Context.” Dialectica 10(37): 9–30.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1961a. “La conscience et les valeurs.” Dialectica 15(57–58): 185–196.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1961b. “Réponse à Barzin et al. (1961).” Dialectica 15(57–58): 204–207.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1963. “On Constructing a Philosophical System.” Logique et Analyse 6(21–24): 179–194.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1967. “The Right and the Limitations of Buber’s Dialogical Thought.” in The Philosophy of Martin Buber, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp and Maurice Friedman, pp. 97–132. The Library of Living Philosophers n. 12. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1968. “On the Justification of Philosophical Systems.” Logique et Analyse 11(41–42): 305–332.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1972. “Bergson and the Transformations of the Notion of Intuition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 10(3): 335–346.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1978a. “Historical Actions or Historical Events.” in Philosophy of History and Action. Papers Presented at the First Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter, edited by Yirmiyahu Yovel, pp. 69–84. Philosophical Studies Series n. 11. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1978b. “Evidence and the Aim of Cognitive Activity.” in The Human Being in Action. The Irreducible Element in Man. Part II: Investigations at the Intersection of Philosophy and Psychiatry, edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, pp. 245–258. Analecta Husserliana n. 7. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1980a. “On Nihilism – Hamilton’s Contribution.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62(1): 46–57.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1980b. “Hypostasis and Fetishmaking.” Kant-Studien 71(1): 60–77.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1983a. “Theory and Practice in Kant und Hegel.” in Kant oder Hegel? Über Formen der Begründung in der Philosophie, edited by Dieter Henrich, pp. 99–128. Veröffentlichungen der Internationalen Hegel-Vereinigung n. 12. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1983b. “Love and Leap.” Kant-Studien 74(4): 437–452.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1983c. “The System and Its Components.” in Spinoza: His Thought and Work. Entretiens in Jerusalem, 6-9 September 1977, edited by Nathan Rotenstreich and Norma Schneider, pp. 14–23. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences; Humanities.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1984. “Variations of Transcendentalism.” in Philosophy and Science in Phenomenological Perspective, edited by Kah Kyung Cho, pp. 171–182. Phaenomenologica n. 95. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1985. Reflection and Action. Phaenomenologica n. 97. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1986. “Origin and Spontaneity: A Comment [on Funkenstein (1986)].” in The Kaleidoscope of Science. The Israel Colloquium: Studies in History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science. Volume 1, edited by Edna Ullmann-Margalit, pp. 65–74. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 94. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1987. Time and Meaning in History. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 101. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1989a. “Morality and Culture: A Note on Kant.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 6(3): 303–316.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1989b. “On the Formalism of Kant’s Ethics.” in Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered. Papers Presented at the 7th Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter (December 1986), edited by Yirmiyahu Yovel, pp. 49–62. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées n. 128. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1990. “Between Succession and Duration.” Kant-Studien 81(2): 211–220.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1994. “Needs and Essence.” Kant-Studien 85(1): 32–47.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1996. “Schopenhauer on Beauty and Ontology.” in Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts, 1st ed., pp. 150–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1998. Synthesis and Intentional Objectivity. On Kant and Husserl. Contributions to Phenomenology n. 33. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rotenstreich, Nathan and Schneider, Norma, eds. 1983. Spinoza: His Thought and Work. Entretiens in Jerusalem, 6-9 September 1977. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences; Humanities.
Smith, John Edwin, Aaron, Richard Ithamar, Passmore, John A., Rotenstreich, Nathan and Mercier, André. 1961. “Discussion de van Melsen (1961) et de Barzin (1961).” Dialectica 15(57–58): 80–83.

Further References

Barzin, Marcel. 1961. “La connaissance scientifique.” Dialectica 15(57–58): 73–79.
Barzin, Marcel, Perelman, Chaı̈m, Passmore, John A. and Ayer, Alfred Jules. 1961. “Discussion sur Rotenstreich (1961a) et Ewing (1961).” Dialectica 15(57–58): 202–204.
Ewing, Alfred Cyril. 1961. “La conscience et les valeurs.” Dialectica 15(57–58): 197–202.
Funkenstein, Amos. 1986. “The Persecution of Absolutes: On the Kantian and Neo-Kantian Theories of Science.” in The Kaleidoscope of Science. The Israel Colloquium: Studies in History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science. Volume 1, edited by Edna Ullmann-Margalit, pp. 39–64. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 94. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Hersch, Jeanne. 1961. “Nature, limites et conditions de la connaissance historique.” Dialectica 15(57–58): 231–244.
Marias, Julián. 1961. “Nature, limites et conditions de la connaissance historique.” Dialectica 15(57–58): 244–253.
van Melsen, Andrew G. M. 1961. “La connaissance scientifique.” Dialectica 15(57–58): 55–73.