Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/rumelhart

David E. Rumelhart (rumelhart)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Gluck, Mark A. and Rumelhart, David E., eds. 1990. Neuroscience and Connectionist Theory. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    McClelland, James L. and Rumelhart, David E. 1985. Levels Indeed! A Response to Broadbent (1985).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114: 193–197.
    Norman, Donald A. and Rumelhart, David E. 1975. Explorations in Cognition. New York: W.H. Freeman; Co.
    Ramsey, William M., Stich, Stephen P. and Rumelhart, David E., eds. 1991. Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Rumelhart, David E. 1979. Some Problems with the Notion of Literal Meanings.” in Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, pp. 71–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Page references are to the second edition.
    Rumelhart, David E. 1989. The Architecture of Mind: A Connectionist Approach.” in Foundations of Cognitive Science, edited by Michael L. Posner, pp. 133–159. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
    Rumelhart, David E. 1991. Understanding Understanding.” in Memories, Thoughts, and Emotions: Essays in Honor of George Mandler, edited by William Kessen, Andrew Ortony, and Fergus I. M. Craik, pp. 257–276. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Rumelhart, David E. 1992. Towards a Microstructural Account of Human Reasoning.” in Connectionism: Theory and Practice, edited by Steven Davis, pp. 69–83. Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science n. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Rumelhart, David E. 1997. Affect and Neuromodulation: A Connectionist Approach.” in Scientific Approaches to Consciousness, edited by Jonathan D. Cohen and Jonathan W. Schooler, pp. 469–478. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Further References

    Broadbent, Donald E. 1985. A Question of Levels: Comment on McClelland and Rumelhart.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114: 189–192.