Gil Sagi (sagi-gi)
Adresse email :
gilisagi(at)gmail.com
Mentionné.e sur les pages du portail suivantes
Articles of Dialectica, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Formalization of Arguments: An Overview [introduction to the special issue], The Quantified Argument Calculus and Natural Logic, Reflective Equilibrium on the Fringe, The Primacy of the Universal Quantifier in Frege's Concept-Script, Holistic Inferential Criteria of Adequate Formalization, “Unless” is “Or”, Unless “¬A Unless A” is Invalid, Assumptions, Hypotheses, and AntecedentsCité.e dans les articles suivants
The Formalization of Arguments: An Overview [introduction to the special issue], Considerations on Logical Consequence and Natural LanguageContributions à Philosophie.ch
Bibliography
Beall, J. C., Restall, Greg and Sagi, Gil. 2019. “Logical Consequence.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/logical-consequence/.
Sagi, Gil. 2011. “Sher and Shapiro on Logical Terms.” in The Logica Yearbook 2010, edited by Michal Peliš and Vı́t Punčochář, pp. 199–210. London: College Publications.
Sagi, Gil. 2014a. “Formality in Logic: From Logical Terms to Semantic Constraints.” Logique et Analyse 57(227): 259–276, doi:10.2143/LEA.227.0.3053506.
Sagi, Gil. 2014b. “Models and Logical Consequence.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 43(5): 943–964.
Sagi, Gil. 2015. “The Modal and Epistemic Arguments Against the Invariance Criterion for Logical Terms.” The Journal of Philosophy 112(3): 159–167, doi:10.5840/jphil201511239.
Sagi, Gil. 2020a. “Considerations on Logical Consequence and Natural Language.” Dialectica 74(2). Special issue “The Formalisation of Arguments,” guest edited by Robert Michels, doi:10.48106/dial.v74.i2.06.
Sagi, Gil. 2020b. “Logic and Natural Language: Commitments and Constraints.” Disputatio 12(58): 377–408, doi:10.2478/disp-2020-0014.
Sagi, Gil. 2021. “Logic as a Methodological Discipline.” Synthese 199(3-4): 9725–9749, doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03223-3.