References
Anderson, Alan Ross and Belnap, Nuel D., Jr. 1975. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. Volume 1. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, Michael. 2010. “Informal Reasoning & Logical Formalization.” in P.F. Strawson – Ding und Begriff / Object and Concept, edited by Sarah-Jane Conrad and Silvan Imhof, pp. 11–34. Logos n. 18. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, doi:10.1515/9783110323702.11.
Baumgartner, Michael and Lampert, Timm. 2008. “Adequate Formalization.” Synthese 164(1): 93–115, doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9218-1.
Beall, J. C. and Restall, Greg. 2006. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288403.001.0001.
Beall, J. C., Restall, Greg and Sagi, Gil. 2019. “Logical Consequence.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/logical-consequence/.
Betz, Gregor. 2010. Theorie dialektischer Strukturen. Philosophische Abhandlungen n. 101. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann, doi:10.5771/9783465136293.
Betz, Gregor. 2013. Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs. Synthese Library n. 357. Dordrecht: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4599-5.
Blau, Ulrich. 1977. Die dreiwertige Logik der Sprache. Ihre Syntax, Semantik und Anwendung in der Sprachanalyse. Berlin: de Gruyter, doi:10.1515/9783110838794.
Bonnay, Denis. 2008. “Logicality and Invariance.” The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14(1): 29–68, doi:10.2178/bsl/1208358843.
Bonnay, Denis. 2014. “Logical Constants, or How to Use Invariance in Order to Complete the Explication of Logical Consequence.” Philosophy Compass 9(1): 54–65, doi:10.1111/phc3.12095.
Brandom, Robert B. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Brun, Georg. 2004. Die richtige Formel. Philosophische Probleme der logischen Formalisierung. 2nd ed. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. First edition: Brun (2003).
Brun, Georg. 2012. “Adequate Formalization and de Morgan’s Argument.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 85: 325–335. “Bolzano & Kant,” ed. by Sandra Lapointe, doi:10.1163/9789401208338_017.
Caret, Colin R. and Hjortland, Ole Thomassen. 2015. “Logical Consequence: Its Nature, Structure, and Application.” in Foundations of Logical Consequence, edited by Colin R. Caret and Ole Thomassen Hjortland, pp. 3–31. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715696.003.0001.
Carnap, Rudolf. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. 1st ed. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. Second edition: Carnap (1956).
Cobreros, Pablo, Egré, Paul, Ripley, David and van Rooij, Robert. 2012. “Tolerant, Classical, Strict.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 41(2): 347–385, doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9165-z.
Cresswell, Maxwell J. 1990. Entities and Indices. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy n. 41. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2139-9.
Davidson, Donald. 1967. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” in The Logic of Decision and Action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, pp. 81–95. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted in Davidson (1980, 105–148).
Douven, Igor. 2021. “Abduction.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/abduction/.
Dummett, Michael A. E. 1976. “What is a Theory of Meaning (II).” in Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, edited by Gareth Evans and John Henry McDowell, pp. 67–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Dummett (1993, 34–93), doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250074.003.0004.
Dummett, Michael A. E. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.
Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2011. “The Different Ways in which Logic is (said to be) Formal.” History and Philosophy of Logic 32(4): 303–332, doi:10.1080/01445340.2011.555505.
Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2012. Formal Languages in Logic. A Philosophical and Cognitive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139108010.
Epstein, Richard L. 1994. The Semantic Foundations of Logic. [Volume 2:] Predicate Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Etchemendy, John. 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Field, Hartry. 2009. “Pluralism in Logic.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 2(2): 342–359, doi:10.1017/s1755020309090182.
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle a.S.: Louis Nebert.
Frege, Gottlob. 1893. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, begriffsschriftlich abgeleitet, 1. Band. Jena: Hermann Pohle. Reissued as Frege (1966).
Gentzen, Gerhard. 1935. “Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen.” Mathematische Zeitschrift 39: 176–210, 405–431. Republished as Gentzen (1969), doi:10.1007/BF01201353.
Glanzberg, Michael. 2015. “Logical Consequence and Natural Language.” in Foundations of Logical Consequence, edited by Colin R. Caret and Ole Thomassen Hjortland, pp. 71–120. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715696.003.0003.
Goodman, Nelson. 1955. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Groarke, Leo. 2021. “Informal Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/logic-informal/.
Haack, Susan. 1978. Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812866.
Hanson, William H. 1997. “Review of Etchemendy (1990).” The Philosophical Review 106(3): 365–409, doi:10.2307/2998398.
Kamp, Hans. 1971. “Formal Properties of ‘Now’ .” Theoria 37(3): 227–273. Reprinted in Kamp (2013, 11–52), doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1971.tb00071.x.
Kripke, Saul A. 1975. “Outline of a Theory of Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 72(19): 690–716. Reprinted in Kripke (2011, 75–98), doi:10.2307/2024634.
Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
Lambert, Karel. 1981. “On the Philosophical Foundations of Free Logic.” Inquiry 24(2): 147–203. Reprinted and “much revised” in Lambert (2002, 122–175), doi:10.1080/00201748108601931.
Lewis, David. 1968. “Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic.” The Journal of Philosophy 65(5): 113–126. Reprinted, with a postscript (lewis_dk:1983f?), in Lewis (1983, 26–39), doi:10.2307/2024555.
MacFarlane, John. 2000. “What does it Mean to Say that Logic is Formal?” PhD dissertation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh, https://web.archive.org/web/20030510033523id_/http://socrates.berkeley.edu:80/~jmacf/Diss.pdf.
MacFarlane, John. 2015. “Logical Constants.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/logical-constants/.
Machina, Kenton F. 1976. “Truth, Belief, and Vagueness.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 5(1): 47–78, doi:10.1007/bf00263657.
Mares, Edwin D. 2020. “Relevance Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/logic-relevance/.
McCarthy, Timothy G. 1981. “The Idea of a Logical Constant.” The Journal of Philosophy 78(9): 499–523, doi:10.2307/2026088.
McGee, Vann. 1996. “Logical Operations.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 25(6): 567–580, doi:10.1007/bf00265253.
Nolt, John E. 2020. “Free Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/logic-free/.
Paseau, Alexander C. 2019. “A Measure of Inferential-Role Preservation.” Synthese 196(7): 2621–2642, doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0705-5.
Peregrin, Jaroslav. 2014. Inferentialism. Why Rules Matter. London: Palgrave Macmillan, doi:10.1057/9781137452962.
Peregrin, Jaroslav and Svoboda, Vladimı́r. 2017. Reflective Equilibrium and the Principles of Logical Analysis. Understanding the Laws of Logic. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9781315453934.
Plato, Jan von. 2014. “The Development of Proof Theory.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/proof-theory-development/.
Prawitz, Dag. 1974. “On the Idea of a General Proof Theory.” Synthese 27(1-2): 63–77, doi:10.1007/bf00660889.
Prawitz, Dag. 2005. “Logical Consequence From a Constructivist Point of View.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, edited by Stewart Shapiro, pp. 671–695. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325928.003.0022.
Priest, Graham. 2006. Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0199263280.001.0001.
Prior, Arthur Norman. 1960. “The Runabout Inference-Ticket.” Analysis 21(2): 38–39. Reprinted in Prior (1976, 85–87), doi:10.1093/analys/21.2.38.
Read, Stephen. 2006. “Monism: The One True Logic.” in A Logical Approach to Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Graham Solomon, edited by David DeVidi and Timothy Kenyon, pp. 193–209. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 69. Dordrecht: Springer, doi:10.1007/1-4020-4054-7_10.
Rumfitt, Ian. 2017. “Against Harmony.” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Bob Hale, Crispin Wright, and Alexander Miller, 2nd ed., pp. 225–249. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. First edition: Hale and Wright (1997), doi:10.1002/9781118972090.ch10.
Russell, Bertrand Arthur William. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind 14(56): 479–493. Reprinted in Feigl and Sellars (1949, 103–115), in Russell, B. A. W. (1956), Russell, B. A. W. (1973, 103–119) and in Russell, B. A. W. (1994, 414–428), doi:10.1093/mind/fzi873.
Russell, Gillian K. 2023. “Logical Pluralism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/logical-pluralism/.
Ryle, Gilbert. 1954. Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The Tarner Lectures 1953, doi:10.1017/cbo9781316286586.
Sagi, Gil. 2014. “Formality in Logic: From Logical Terms to Semantic Constraints.” Logique et Analyse 57(227): 259–276, doi:10.2143/LEA.227.0.3053506.
Sagi, Gil. 2015. “The Modal and Epistemic Arguments Against the Invariance Criterion for Logical Terms.” The Journal of Philosophy 112(3): 159–167, doi:10.5840/jphil201511239.
Sainsbury, Richard Mark. 2001. Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. First edition: Sainsbury (1991).
Salmon, Wesley C. 1963. Logic. Foundations of Philosophy Series. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Second edition: Salmon (1973).
Schröder-Heister, Peter. 2018. “Proof-Theoretic Semantics.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/proof-theoretic-semantics/.
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1953. “Inference and Meaning.” Mind 62(247): 313–338. Reprinted in Sellars (1980) and in Sellars (2007, 3–27), doi:10.1093/mind/lxii.247.313.
Shapiro, Stewart. 2014. Varieties of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696529.001.0001.
Sher, Gila Y. 1991. The Bounds of Logic. A Generalized Viewpoint. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Shoesmith, David J. and Smiley, Timothy J. 1978. Multiple Conclusion Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565687.
Smith, Nicholas J. J. 2008. Vagueness and Degrees of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233007.001.0001.
Steinberger, Florian. 2011. “What Harmony Could and Could Not Be.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89(4): 617–639, doi:10.1080/00048402.2010.528781.
Tarski, Alfred. 1956b. “On the Concept of Logical Consequence.” in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, 1st ed., pp. 409–420. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Trans. J.H. Woodger, 2nd edition: Tarski (1983).
Tarski, Alfred. 1986. “What are Logical Notions?” History and Philosophy of Logic 7(2): 143–154, doi:10.1080/01445348608837096.
Tarski, Alfred. 2002. “On the Concept of Following Logically.” History and Philosophy of Logic 23(3): 176–196. Translation of Tarski (1936a) by Magda Stroińska and David Hitchcock, doi:10.1080/0144534021000036683.
Tennant, Neil W. 1987. Anti-Realism and Logic: Truth as Eternal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vlach, Frank. 1973. “ ‘Now’ and ‘Then’: A Formal Study in the Logic of Tense Anaphora.” PhD dissertation, Los Angeles, California: University of California, https://philpapers.org/archive/VLANAT.pdf.
Williamson, Timothy. 1985. “Converse Relations.” The Philosophical Review 94(2): 249–262, doi:10.2307/2185430.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.
Zinke, Alexandra. 2018a. The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence. Studies in Theoretical Philosophy n. 6. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann, doi:10.5771/9783465143451.
Zinke, Alexandra. 2018b. “A Bullet for Invariance: Another Argument Against the Invariance Criterion for Logical Terms.” The Journal of Philosophy 115(7): 382–388, doi:10.5840/jphil2018115723.
Further References
Brun, Georg. 2003. Die richtige Formel. Philosophische Probleme der logischen Formalisierung. Logos n. 2. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. Second edition: Brun (2004), doi:10.1515/9783110323528.
Carnap, Rudolf. 1956. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. 2nd ed. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. Enlarged edition of Carnap (1947).
Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Second, enl. edition: Davidson (2001).
Davidson, Donald. 2001. Essays on Actions and Events. Philosophical Essays Volume 1. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Enlarged, doi:10.1093/0199246270.001.0001.
Dummett, Michael A. E. 1993. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0198236212.001.0001.
Feigl, Herbert and Sellars, Wilfrid, eds. 1949. Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
Frege, Gottlob. 1966. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, begriffsschriftlich abgeleitet, 1. Band. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. Reprografischer Nachdruck der Ausgabe Frege (1893).
Gentzen, Gerhard. 1969. Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Kamp, Hans. 2013. Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation. Selected Papers of Hans Kamp. Leiden: E.J. Brill. Edited by Klaus von Heusinger and Alice ter Meulen, doi:10.1163/9789004252882.
Kripke, Saul A. 2011. Philosophical Troubles. Collected Papers n. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730155.001.0001.
Lambert, Karel. 2002. Free Logic: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165068.
Lewis, David. 1983. Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195032047.001.0001.
Prior, Arthur Norman. 1976. Papers in Logic and Ethics. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Edited by Peter Geach and Anthony Kenny.
Russell, Bertrand Arthur William. 1956. Logic and Knowledge: Essays, 1901–1950. London: George Allen & Unwin. Edited by Robert Charles Marsh.
Russell, Bertrand Arthur William. 1973. Essays in Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin. Edited by Douglas Lackey.
Russell, Bertrand Arthur William. 1994. Foundations of Logic, 1903–1905. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, The McMaster University Edition n. 4. London: Routledge. Edited by Alasdair Urquhart, with the assistance of Albert C. Lewis.
Sainsbury, Richard Mark. 1991. Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Second edition: Sainsbury (2001).
Salmon, Wesley C. 1973. Logic. 2nd ed. Foundations of Philosophy Series. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. First edition: Salmon (1963).
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1980. Pure Pragmatics and Possible Worlds – the Early Essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Co. Edited by Jeffrey F. Sicha.
Sellars, Wilfrid. 2007. In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Edited by Kevin Scharp and Robert B. Brandom.
Tarski, Alfred. 1936a. “Über den Begriff der logischen Folgerung.” in Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique, Paris, 1935. Volume 7: Logique, edited by Institut International de Collaboration Philosophique, pp. 1–11. Actualités scientifiques et industrielles n. 394. Paris: Hermann & cie. German translation of Tarski (1936b).
Tarski, Alfred. 1936b. “O pojciu wynikania logicznego.” Przegląd Filozoficzny 39: 58–68. Translated into German (Tarski 1936a) and English (Tarski 1956b).