Peter Forrest (forrest-p)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Forrest, Peter. 1978. “The Metaphysics of Causation. Causation, Conditionals and Regularities.” MA thesis, Hobart: Philosophy Department, University of Tasmania.
Forrest, Peter. 1982. “Occam’s Razor and Possible Worlds.” The Monist 65: 456–464.
Forrest, Peter. 1984. “Bradley and Realism about Universals.” Idealistic Studies 14: 200–212.
Forrest, Peter. 1985a. “An Indubitability Analysis of Knowledge.” The Monist 68: 24–39.
Forrest, Peter. 1985b. “Backward Causation in Defence of Free Will.” Mind 94: 210–217.
Forrest, Peter. 1985c. “Antinomies and Rational Predicaments: An Inescapable Labyrinth.” Logique et Analyse 28(112): 375–384.
Forrest, Peter. 1986a. The Dynamics of Belief: A Normative Logic. Philosophical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Forrest, Peter. 1986b. “Ways Worlds Could Be.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(1): 15–24.
Forrest, Peter. 1986c. “Neither Magic nor Mereology: A Reply to Lewis (1986).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(1): 89–91.
Forrest, Peter. 1986d. “The Logic of Free Acts and the Powers of God.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27(1): 20–38.
Forrest, Peter. 1987. “The Logic of Naturalness.” Logique et Analyse 30(117–118): 91–102.
Forrest, Peter. 1988a. Quantum Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Forrest, Peter. 1988b. “Supervenience: The Grand-Property Hypothesis.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66: 1–12.
Forrest, Peter. 1990. “New Problems with Repeatable Properties and with Change.” Noûs 24: 543–556.
Forrest, Peter. 1991a. “Review of Lewis (1991).” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32: 494–497.
Forrest, Peter. 1991b. “Review of Campbell (1990).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 105–108.
Forrest, Peter. 1991c. “Aesthetic Understanding.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51(3): 525–540.
Forrest, Peter. 1991d. “How can we Speak of God? How can we Speak of Anything.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 29(1): 33–52.
Forrest, Peter. 1992a. “Universals and Universalisability: An Interpretation of Oddie’s Discussion of Supervenience.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70: 93–98.
Forrest, Peter. 1992b. “Review of van Fraassen (1991).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70: 379–381.
Forrest, Peter. 1992c. “Reference and the Refutation of Naturalism.” in Our Knowledge of God. Essays on Natural and Philosophical Theology, edited by Kelly James Clark, pp. 67–86. Studies in Philosophy and Religion n. 16. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Forrest, Peter. 1993a. “Just Like Quarks? The Status of Repeatables.” in Ontology, Causality and Mind – Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong, edited by John Bacon, Keith Campbell, and Loyd R. Reinhardt, pp. 45–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forrest, Peter. 1993b. “Review of Teichmann (1992).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71: 343–344.
Forrest, Peter. 1993c. “Difficulties with Physicalism, and a Programme for Dualists.” in Objections to Physicalism, edited by Howard Robinson, pp. 251–270. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198242567.001.0001.
Forrest, Peter. 1994. “Why Most of Us should Be Scientific Realists: A Reply to van Fraassen.” The Monist 77(1): 47–70.
Forrest, Peter. 1995. “Is Space-Time Discrete or Continuous? – An Empirical Question.” Synthese 103: 327–354.
Forrest, Peter. 1996a. God without the Supernatural. A Defense of Scientific Theism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Forrest, Peter. 1996b. “Space Curvature and Repeatable Properties: Mormann’s Perspectival Theory [reply to Mormann (1995)].” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 319–323.
Forrest, Peter. 1996c. “From Ontology to Topology in the Theory of Regions.” The Monist 79(1): 34–50.
Forrest, Peter. 1996d. “How Innocent is Mereology?” Analysis 56: 127–131.
Forrest, Peter. 1996e. “Physical Necessity and the Passage of Time.” in Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology, edited by Peter J. Riggs, pp. 49–62. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 12. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Forrest, Peter. 1996f. “The Identity of Indiscernibles.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall1997/entries/identity-indiscernible/.
Forrest, Peter. 1997a. “Common Sense and a ‘Wigner-Dirac’ Approach to Quantum Mechanics.” The Monist 80(1): 131–159.
Forrest, Peter. 1997b. “Pantheism and Science.” The Monist 80(2): 307–319.
Forrest, Peter. 1997c. “The Epistemology of Religion.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall1997/entries/religion-epistemology/.
Forrest, Peter. 1998. “Divine Fission: A New Way of Moderating Social Trinitarianism.” Religious Studies 34: 281–297. Reprinted in Rea (2009, 44–60).
Forrest, Peter. 1999a. “Towards an Epistemology of Religious Traditions.” Sophia: International journal for philosophy of religion, metaphysical theology and ethics 38: 25–40.
Forrest, Peter. 1999b. “Actuality and Consciousness.” in Proceedings of the 21st International Wittgenstein Symposium: Applied Ethics, edited by Peter Kampits and Anja Weiberg. Schriftenreihe der Österreichischen Ludwig Wittgenstein Gesellschaft n. 27. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
Forrest, Peter. 1999c. “Supertasks and Material Objects.” Logique et Analyse 42(167–168): 441–446.
Forrest, Peter. 2000a. “The Incarnation: a Philosophical Case for Kenosis.” Religious Studies 36: 127–140. Reprinted in Rea (2009, 225–238).
Forrest, Peter. 2000b. “The Entanglement of Truth-Makers.” Logique et Analyse 43(169–170): 185–194.
Forrest, Peter. 2001a. “Mark Wynn’s Defence of ‘The Supernatural’ .” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75(1): 101–104.
Forrest, Peter. 2001b. “Counting the Cost of Modal Realism.” in Reality and Humean Supervenience. Essays on the Philosophy of David Lewis, edited by Gerhard Preyer and Frank Siebelt, pp. 93–104. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Forrest, Peter. 2002a. “Sets as Mereological Tropes.” Metaphysica 3(1): 5–9.
Forrest, Peter. 2002b. “Heterodox Probability Theory.” in A Companion to Philosophical Logic, edited by Dale Jacquette, pp. 582–594. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470996751.
Forrest, Peter. 2002c. “Nonclassical Mereology and Its Application to Sets.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43(2): 79–94.
Forrest, Peter. 2002d. “Review of Miller (2002).” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 8(1).
Forrest, Peter. 2002e. “The Epistemology of Religion.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/religion-epistemology/.
Forrest, Peter. 2002f. “The Identity of Indiscernibles.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/identity-indiscernible/.
Forrest, Peter. 2003. “The Trinity and Personal Identity.” in The Trinity: East/West Dialogue, edited by Melville Y. Stewart, pp. 75–82. Studies in Philosophy and Religion n. 24. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Forrest, Peter. 2004a. “Grit or Gunk: Implications of the Banach-Tarski Paradox.” The Monist 87(3): 351–370.
Forrest, Peter. 2004b. “The Real but Dead Past: a Reply to Braddon-Mitchell (2004).” Analysis 64(4): 358–362, doi:10.1111/j.0003-2638.2004.00510.x.
Forrest, Peter. 2005. “Universals as Sense-Data.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71(3): 622–631.
Forrest, Peter. 2006a. “General Facts, Physical Necessity, and the Metaphysics of Time.” in Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, volume II, edited by Dean W. Zimmerman, pp. 137–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199290581.001.0001.
Forrest, Peter. 2006b. “The Operator Theory of Instantiation.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84(2): 213–228.
Forrest, Peter. 2006c. “Endurance and Fatalism.” Metaphysica 7(2).
Forrest, Peter. 2006d. “Uniform Grounding of Truth and the Growing Block Theory: A Reply to Heathwood (2005).” Analysis 66(2): 161–163.
Forrest, Peter. 2006e. “Collective Guilt; Individual Shame.” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30: Shared Intentions and Collective Responsibility, edited by Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein, pp. 145–153. Boston, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Forrest, Peter. 2006f. “Epistemic Bootstrapping.” in Aspects of Knowing. Epistemological Essays, edited by Stephen Cade Hetherington, pp. 53–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Forrest, Peter. 2006g. “The Epistemology of Religion.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/religion-epistemology/.
Forrest, Peter. 2007a. Developmental Theism: From Pure Will to Unbounded Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214587.001.0001.
Forrest, Peter. 2007b. “Mereological Summation and the Question of Unique Fusion.” Analysis 67(3): 237–242.
Forrest, Peter. 2007c. “The Tree of Life: Agency and Immortality in a Metaphysics Inspired by Quantum Theory.” in Persons. Human and Divine, edited by Peter van Inwagen and Dean W. Zimmerman, pp. 301–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forrest, Peter. 2008. “Relativity, the Passage of Time and the Cosmic Clock.” in The Ontology of Spacetime, edited by Dennis Dieks, pp. 245–253. Philosophy and the Foundations of Physics Series n. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Forrest, Peter. 2009a. “Razor Arguments.” in The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, edited by Robin Le Poidevin, Peter M. Simons, Andrew McGonigal, and Ross P. Cameron, pp. 246–255. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203879306.
Forrest, Peter. 2009b. “Vectors on Curved Space.” Dialectica 63(4): 492–501.
Forrest, Peter. 2009c. “The Epistemology of Religion.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/religion-epistemology/.
Forrest, Peter. 2010a. “Can a Soufflé Rise Twice? Van Inwagen’s Irresponsible Time-Travelers.” in Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, volume V, edited by Dean W. Zimmerman, pp. 29–40. New York: Oxford University Press.
Forrest, Peter. 2010b. “Mereotopology without Mereology.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 39(3): 229–254.
Forrest, Peter. 2010c. “The Identity of Indiscernibles.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/identity-indiscernible/.
Forrest, Peter. 2011. “In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3(1): 105–122.
Forrest, Peter. 2012. The Necessary Structure of the All-pervading Aether. Discrete or Continuous? Simple or Symmetric? Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 49. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Forrest, Peter. 2013a. “Exemplification and Parthood.” Axiomathes 23(2): 323–341.
Forrest, Peter. 2013b. “The Epistemology of Religion.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/religion-epistemology/.
Forrest, Peter. 2014a. “Conflicting Intuitions about Space.” in Mereology and Location, edited by Shieva Kleinschmidt, pp. 117–134. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593828.001.0001.
Forrest, Peter. 2014b. “Not Enough Powers [on Leftow (2012)].” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6(3): 25–37.
Forrest, Peter. 2016a. “The Personal Pantheist Concept of God.” in Alternative Concepts of God. Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, pp. 21–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722250.001.0001.
Forrest, Peter. 2016b. “Review of Nerlich (2013).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94(4): 829–832.
Forrest, Peter. 2016c. “The Mereology of Structural Universals.” Logic and Logical Philosophy 25(3): 259–283.
Forrest, Peter. 2017a. “Review of Mulgan (2015).” The Philosophical Quarterly 67(267): 412–415.
Forrest, Peter. 2017b. “Can Phenomenology Determine the Content of Thought?” Philosophical Studies 174(2): 403–424.
Forrest, Peter. 2017c. “Are Thoughts Ever Experiences?” American Philosophical Quarterly 54(1): 47–60.
Forrest, Peter. 2017d. “Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue [critical notice of Callahan and O’Connor (2014)].” Analysis 77(3): 633–642.
Forrest, Peter. 2017e. “Theoretical Mereology.” in Handbook of Mereology, edited by Hans Burkhardt, Johanna Seibt, Guido Imaguire, and Stamatios Gerogiorgakis, pp. 554–562. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2nrzj8n.
Forrest, Peter. 2017f. “The Epistemology of Religion.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/religion-epistemology/.
Forrest, Peter. 2021. “The Epistemology of Religion.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/religion-epistemology/.
Forrest, Peter and Armstrong, David M. 1984. “An Argument Against David Lewis’ Theory of Possible Worlds.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 164–168.
Forrest, Peter and Armstrong, David M. 1987. “The Nature of Number.” Philosophical Papers 16(3): 165–186.
Forrest, Peter, Bishop, John and Perszyk, Kenneth J. 2014. “Philosophy of Religion in Autralasia.” in History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand, volume II, pp. 445–478. Dordrecht: Springer.
Forrest, Peter and Khlentzos, Drew. 2000. “Introduction: Truth Maker and Its Variants.” Logique et Analyse 43(169–170): 3–15.

Further References

Braddon-Mitchell, David. 2004. “How Do We Know it is Now Now?” Analysis 64(3): 199–203, doi:10.1111/j.0003-2638.2004.00485.x.
Callahan, Laura Frances and O’Connor, Timothy, eds. 2014. Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672158.001.0001.
Campbell, Keith. 1990. Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
van Fraassen, Bas C. 1991. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0198239807.001.0001.
Heathwood, Christopher. 2005. “The Real Price of the Dead Past: A Reply to Forrest (2004b) and Braddon-Mitchell (2004).” Analysis 65(3): 249–251.
Leftow, Brian. 2012. God and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263356.001.0001.
Lewis, David. 1986. “Against Structural Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(1): 25–46. Reprinted in Lewis (1999, 78–107), doi:10.1080/00048408612342211.
Lewis, David. 1991. Parts of Classes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Lewis, David. 1999. Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625343.
Miller, Barry. 2002. The Fullness of Being: A New Paradigm for Existence. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mormann, Thomas. 1995. “Space Curvature and Repeatable Properties, Almost No Problems with a Peaceful Coexistence.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73: 114–122.
Mulgan, Timothy. 2015. Purpose in the Universe. The Moral and Metaphysical Case for Ananthropocentric Purposivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646142.001.0001.
Nerlich, Graham C. 2013. Einstein’s Genie. Spacetime out of the Bottle. Montréal: Minkowski Institute Press.
Rea, Michael C., ed. 2009. Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement. Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology n. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teichmann, Roger. 1992. Abstract Entities. London: MacMillan Publishing Co.