William H. Hanson (hanson-wh)
Cité.e dans les articles suivants
The Formalization of Arguments: An Overview [introduction to the special issue]Contributions à Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Hanson, William H. 1965. “Semantics for Deontic Logic.” Logique et Analyse 8(31): 177–190.
Hanson, William H. 1966. “A Logic of Commands.” Logique et Analyse 9(35–36): 329–343.
Hanson, William H. 1971. “Mechanism and Godel’s Theorem.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22: 9–16.
Hanson, William H. 1975. “Names, Random Samples, and Carnap.” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume VI: Induction, Probability and Confirmation, edited by Grover Maxwell and Robert M. Anderson Jr., pp. 367–387. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Hanson, William H. 1980. “First-Degree Entailments and Information.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21(4): 659–671.
Hanson, William H. 1997. “Review of Etchemendy (1990).” The Philosophical Review 106(3): 365–409, doi:10.2307/2998398.
Hanson, William H. 1999.“Ray (1996) on Tarski on Logical Consequence.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 28(6): 607–618.
Hanson, William H. 2002. “The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence: A Reply to Gila Sher (2001).” The Philosophical Review 111(2): 243–258.
Hanson, William H. 2003. “Logic, the A Priori, and the Empirical.” Theoria (San Sebastian), Secunda época 18(47): 171–177.
Hanson, William H. 2006a. “Actuality, Necessity, and Logical Truth.” Philosophical Studies 130(3): 437–459.
Hanson, William H. 2006b. “The Paradox of Nonbeing.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 73: 205–219.
Hanson, William H. 2014. “Logical Truth in Modal Languages: Reply to Nelson and Zalta (2012).” Philosophical Studies 167(2): 327–339.
Further References
Etchemendy, John. 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Nelson, Michael and Zalta, Edward N. 2012. “A Defense of Contingent Logical Truths.” Philosophical Studies 157(1): 153–162.
Ray, Gregory. 1996. “Logical Consequence: A Defense of Tarski.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 25(6): 617–677.
Sher, Gila Y. 2001. “The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence.” The Philosophical Review 110(2): 241–261.