Michael Martin (martin-mi)

Contributi a Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Martin, Michael. 1965. “The Falsifiability of Curve-Hypotheses.” Philosophical Studies 16(4): 56–60.
Martin, Michael. 1967. “Comments [on Moore (1967)]: Analytic Premises and Existential Conclusions.” in Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1964–1966. In Memory of Norwood Russell Hanson, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 376–386. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 3. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Martin, Michael. 1969. “Understanding and Participant Observation in Cultural and Social Anthropology.” in Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966/1968, Part I, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 303–330. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 4. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Martin, Michael. 1972. “Theoretical Pluralism.” Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 2(4): 341–350.
Martin, Michael. 1973a. “The Explication of a Theory.” Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 3(2–3): 179–199.
Martin, Michael. 1973b. “Value Judgments and the Acceptance of Hypothesis in Science and Science Education.” Philosophic Exchange 4: 83–100.
Martin, Michael. 1977. “The Formalities of Evil and a Finite God.” Crı́tica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofı́a 9(25): 89–92.
Martin, Michael. 1978. “The Formalities of Evil and a Finite God: Corrigenda [to Martin (1977)].” Crı́tica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofı́a 10(28): 133–135.
Martin, Michael. 1982. “Prima Facie Evidence.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 9(3): 235–238.
Martin, Michael. 1984. “How to Be a Good Philosopher of Science: A Plea for Empiricism in Matters Methodological (Commentary on Burian).” in Methodology, Metaphysics and the History of Science. In Memory of Benjamin Nelson, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 33–42. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 84. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Martin, Michael. 1985. “The Coherence of the Hypothesis of an Omnipotent, Omniscient, Free and Perfectly Evil.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 17(3): 185–191.
Martin, Michael. 1986. “Swinburne’s Inductive Cosmological Argument.” The Heythrop Journal 27(2): 151–162.
Martin, Michael. 1987. “A Theistic Inductive Argument from Evil?” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22(1): 81–87.
Martin, Michael. 1990a. Atheism. A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.
Martin, Michael. 1990b. “On a New Argument for the Existence of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 28(1): 25–34.
Martin, Michael. 1991. The Case against Christianity. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.
Martin, Michael. 1992. “Atheistic Teleological Arguments.” in Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology, edited by R. Douglas Geivett and Brendan Sweetman, pp. 43–57. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, Michael. 1993. “The Rational Role of Experience.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 71–88.
Martin, Michael. 2000. “Omniscience and Incoherence.” in Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times, edited by Ghita Holmström-HIntikka, pp. 17–34. Synthese Library n. 288. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Martin, Michael. 2004. “It is Not Rational to Believe in the Resurrection.” in Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Religion, edited by Michael L. Peterson and Raymond J. VanArragon, pp. 174–183. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy n. 1. Boston, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Martin, Michael, ed. 2007a. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Michael. 2007b. “General Introduction.” in The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, edited by Michael Martin, pp. 1–7. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Michael. 2007c. “Atheism and Religion.” in The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, edited by Michael Martin, pp. 217–232. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Michael. 2010a. “The Verificationist Challenge.” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Religion, edited by R. Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, and Philip L. Quinn, 2nd ed., pp. 458–466. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Martin, Michael. 2010b. “Theism and Incoherence.” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Religion, edited by R. Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, and Philip L. Quinn, 2nd ed., pp. 467–473. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Martin, Michael. 2013. “The Incarnation Doctrine is Incoherent and Unlikely.” in Debating Christian Theism, edited by James Porter Moreland, Khaldoun A. Sweis, and Chad Meister, pp. 404–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Further References

Moore, Asher. 1967. “The Center of the World.” in Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1964–1966. In Memory of Norwood Russell Hanson, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 356–375. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 3. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.