Erich H. Reck (reck-e)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Awodey, Steven and Reck, Erich H. 2002a. “Completeness and Categoricity, Part I: Nineteenth-Century Axiomatics to Twentieth-Century Metalogic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 23(1): 1–30.
Awodey, Steven and Reck, Erich H. 2002b. “Completeness and Categoricity, Part II: Twentieth-Century Metalogic to Twenty-First-Century Semantics.” History and Philosophy of Logic 23(2): 77–94.
Beaney, Michael and Reck, Erich H., eds. 2005a. Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments. Volume I: Frege’s Philosophy in Context. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Beaney, Michael and Reck, Erich H., eds. 2005b. Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments. Volume II: Frege’s Philosophy of Logic. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Beaney, Michael and Reck, Erich H., eds. 2005c. Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments. Volume III: Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Beaney, Michael and Reck, Erich H., eds. 2005d. Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments. Volume IV: Frege’s Philosophy of Thought and Language. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge.
Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Reck, Erich H. 2017. “Carnapian Explication, Formalisms as Cognitive Tools, and the Paradox of Adequate Formalization.” Synthese 194(1): 195–215.
Reck, Erich H. 1997. “Frege’s Influence on Wittgenstein: Reversing Metaphysics via the Context Principle.” in Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein. Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky, edited by William Walker Tait. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co.
Reck, Erich H., ed. 2002a. From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195133269.001.0001.
Reck, Erich H. 2002b. “Wittgenstein’s ‘Great Debt’ to Frege: Biographical Traces and Philosophical Themes.” in From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy, edited by Erich H. Reck, pp. 3–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195133269.001.0001.
Reck, Erich H. 2007a. “Frege-Russell Numbers: Analysis or Explication?” in The Analytic Turn. Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, edited by Michael Beaney, pp. 33–50. Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy n. 32. London: Routledge.
Reck, Erich H. 2007b. “Frege on Truth, Judgment, and Objectivity.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 75: 149–173.  “Essays on Frege’s Conception of Truth,” ed. by Dirk Greimann.
Reck, Erich H. 2008a. “Carnap and Modern Logic.” in The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, edited by Michael Friedman and Richard Creath, pp. 176–199. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reck, Erich H. 2008b. “Dedekind’s Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2008/entries/dedekind-foundations/.
Reck, Erich H. 2011. “Dedekind’s Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/dedekind-foundations/.
Reck, Erich H., ed. 2013a. The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. History of Analytic Philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reck, Erich H. 2013b. “Frege, Dedekind, and the Origins of Logicism.” History and Philosophy of Logic 34(3): 242–265.
Reck, Erich H. 2013c. “Introduction: Analytic Philosophy and Philosophical History.” in The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy, edited by Erich H. Reck, pp. 1–38. History of Analytic Philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reck, Erich H. 2013d. “Frege or Dedekind? Towards a Reevaluation of Their Legacies.” in The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy, edited by Erich H. Reck, pp. 139–170. History of Analytic Philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reck, Erich H. 2013e. “Hempel, Carnap, and the Covering Law Model.” in The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism, edited by Nikolay Milkov and Volker Peckhaus, pp. 311–324. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 273. Dordrecht: Springer.
Reck, Erich H. 2016. “Dedekind’s Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/dedekind-foundations/.
Reck, Erich H. 2019. “Frege’s Relation to Dedekind: Basic Laws and Beyond.” in Essays on Frege’s Basic Laws of Arithmetic, edited by Philip A. Ebert and Marcus Rossberg, pp. 264–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198712084.001.0001.
Reck, Erich H. 2020. “Dedekind’s Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/dedekind-foundations/.
Reck, Erich H. and Awodey, Steven. 2003. Frege’s Lectures on Logic: Carnap’s Jena Notes, 1910-1914. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co.
Reck, Erich H. and Cook, Roy T. 2016. “Introduction to Special Issue: Reconsidering Frege’s Conception of Number.” Philosophia Mathematica 24(1): 1–8.
Reck, Erich H. and Schiemer, Georg. 2019. “Structuralism in the Philosophy of Mathematics.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/structuralism-mathematics/.
Reck, Erich H. and Schiemer, Georg. 2020. The Prehistory of Mathematical Structuralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780190641221.001.0001.
Schiemer, Georg, Zach, Richard J. and Reck, Erich H. 2017. “Carnap’s Early Metatheory: Scope and Limits.” Synthese 194(1): 33–65.