Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/dutilhnovaes

Catarina Dutilh-Novaes (dutilhnovaes)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Duncombe, Matthew and Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2016. Dialectic and Logic in Aristotle and His Tradition.” History and Philosophy of Logic 37(1): 1–8.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2000. A Study of William of Ockham’s Logic – From Suppositio to Truth-Conditions.” Unpublished manuscript.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2003. Ockham on Supposition and Equivocation in Mental Language.” in Knowledge, Mental Language, and Free Will, edited by Gyula Klima and Alexander W. Hall, pp. 37–50. Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics n. 3. Newcastle upon Tye: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Book publication 2011, page references after online version.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2004a. The Buridanian Account of Inferential Relations between Doubly Quantified Propositions: A Proof of Soundness.” History and Philosophy of Logic 25(3): 225–243.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2004b. A Medieval Reformulation of the de dicto / de re Distinction.” in The Logica Yearbook 2003, edited by Libor Běhounek, pp. 111–124. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2005a. Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance.” Synthese 145(3): 371–395.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2005b. Buridan’s Consequentia: Consequence and Inference Within a Token-Based Semantics.” History and Philosophy of Logic 26(4): 277–297.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2005c. In Search of the Intuitive Notion of Logical Consequence.” in The Logica Yearbook 2004, edited by Marta Bı́lková and Libor Běhounek, pp. 109–124. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2006. Ralph Strode’s obligationes: The Return of Consistency and the Epistemic Turn.” Vivarium 44(2–3): 338–374.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2007a. Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories: suppositio, consequentiae and obligationes. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 7. Dordrecht: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5853-0.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2007b. Theory of Supposition vs. Theory of Fallacies in Ockham.” Vivarium 45(2–3): 343–359. Reprinted in Marenbon (2007, 213–229).
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2008a. Tarski’s Hidden Theory of Meaning: Sentences Say Exactly One Thing.” in Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox, edited by Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, and Emmanuel J. Genot, pp. 41–64. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 8. Berlin: Springer.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2008b. A Comparative Taxonomy of Medieval and Modern Approaches to Liar Sentences.” History and Philosophy of Logic 29(3): 227–261.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2008c. An Intensional Interpretation of Ockham’s Theory of Supposition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46(3): 365–393.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2008d. Logic in the 14th Century after Ockham.” in Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 2: Medieval and Renaissance Logic, edited by Dov M. Gabbay and John Woods, pp. 433–504. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2009a. Medieval Obligationes as a Regimentation of ‘the Game of Giving and Asking for Reasons’.” in The Logica Yearbook 2008, edited by Michal Peliš, pp. 27–42. London: College Publications.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2009b. Lessons on Sentential Meaning from Mediaeval Solutions to the Liar Paradox.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59(237): 682–704.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2009c. Judgments, Contents and Their Representations.” in Acts of Knowledge: History, Philosophy and Logic. Essays Dedicated to Göran Sundholm, edited by Giuseppe Primiero and Shahid Rahman. Tributes n. 9. London: King’s College Publications.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2010. Surprises in Logic.” in The Logica Yearbook 2009, edited by Michal Peliš, pp. 47–62. London: College Publications.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2011a. The Different Ways in which Logic is (said to be) Formal.” History and Philosophy of Logic 32(4): 303–332, doi:10.1080/01445340.2011.555505.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2011b. Lessons on Truth from Mediaeval Solutions to the Liar Paradox.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61(242): 58–78.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2011c. Medieval Obligationes as aTheory of Discursive Commitment Management.” Vivarium 49(1): 240–257.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2012a. Formal Languages in Logic. A Philosophical and Cognitive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139108010.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2012b. Medieval Theories of Consequence.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/consequence-medieval/.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2012c. Form and Matter in Later Latin Medieval Logic: The Cases of Suppositio and Consequentia.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(3): 339–364.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2012d. Lessons in Philosophy of Logic from Medieval Obligationes.” in New Waves in Philosophical Logic, edited by Greg Restall and Gillian K. Russell, pp. 142–168. New Waves in Philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2012e. Ockham on Supposition Theory, Mental Language, and Angelic Communication.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86(3): 415–434.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2012f. A Medieval Solution to the Puzzle of Empty Names.” in Insolubles and Consequences. Essays in Honour of Stephen Read, edited by Catarina Dutilh-Novaes and Ole Thomassen Hjortland. Tributes n. 18. London: King’s College Publications.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2013a. The Role of ‘Denotatur’ in Ockham’s Theory of Supposition.” Vivarium 51(1–4): 352–370. Reprinted in Bos (2013, 352–370).
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2013b. Mathematical Reasoning and External Symbolic Systems.” Logique et Analyse 56(221): 45–65.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2013c. The Ockham-Burley Dispute.” in A Companion to Walter Burley. Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, edited by Alessandro D. Conti, pp. 49–86. Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition n. 41. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2014. The Undergeneration of Permutation Invariance as a Criterion for Logicality.” Erkenntnis 79(1): 81–97.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2015. A Dialogical, Multi-Agent Account of the Normativity of Logic.” Dialectica 69(4): 587–609.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2016a. Reductio Ad Absurdum from a Dialogical Perspective.” Philosophical Studies 173(10): 2605–2628.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2016b. The Forms of a Syllogism: Mood or Figure? in Formal Approaches and Natural Language in Medieval Logic. Proceedings of the XIXth European Symposium of Medieval Logic and Semantics, Geneva, 12-16 June 2012, edited by Laurent Cesalli, Frédéric Goubier, and Alain de Libera, pp. 117–132. Textes et Études du Moyen Âge n. 82. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2016c. Medieval Theories of Consequence.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/consequence-medieval/.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2020a. The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781108800792.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2020b. Logic and the Psychology of Reasoning.” in The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism, edited by Martin Kusch, pp. 445–454. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9781351052306.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2020c. Medieval Theories of Consequence.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/consequence-medieval/.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2021. Argument and Argumentation.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/argument/.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2023. Should we be Genealogically Anxious? in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 47: Genealogy of Belief: You Just Believe That Because …, edited by Peter A. French, Howard K. Wettstein, and Yuval Avnur, pp. 103–133. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.5840/msp2023103142.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and French, Rohan. 2018. Paradoxes and Structural Rules From a Dialogical Perspective.” in Philosophical Issues 28: Philosophy of Logic and Inferential Reasoning, edited by Cory Juhl and Joshua Schechter, pp. 129–158. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; Sons, Inc., doi:10.1111/phis.12119.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Geerdink, Leon. 2017. The Dissonant Origins of Analytic Philosophy: Common Sense in Philosophical Methodology.” in Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy, edited by Sandra Lapointe and Christopher Pincock, pp. 69–103. Innovations in Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Hjortland, Ole Thomassen, eds. 2012. Insolubles and Consequences. Essays in Honour of Stephen Read. Tributes n. 18. London: King’s College Publications.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina, Jansen, Henrike, Laar, Jan Albert van and Verheij, Bart, eds. 2020a. ECA2019. Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Vol. I. Studies in Logic and Argumentation n. 85. London: College Publications, http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/sla00012.pdf.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina, Jansen, Henrike, Laar, Jan Albert van and Verheij, Bart, eds. 2020b. ECA2019. Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Vol. II. Studies in Logic and Argumentation n. 86. London: College Publications, http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/sla00013.pdf.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina, Jansen, Henrike, Laar, Jan Albert van and Verheij, Bart, eds. 2020c. ECA2019. Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Vol. III. Studies in Logic and Argumentation n. 87. London: College Publications, http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/sla00014.pdf.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Read, Stephen. 2008. Insolubilia and the Fallacy Secundum Quid et Simpliciter.” Vivarium 46(2): 175–191.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Read, Stephen, eds. 2016a. The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449862.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Read, Stephen. 2016b. Introduction.” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic, edited by Catarina Dutilh-Novaes and Stephen Read, pp. 1–17. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449862.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Reck, Erich H. 2017. Carnapian Explication, Formalisms as Cognitive Tools, and the Paradox of Adequate Formalization.” Synthese 194(1): 195–215.
    Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Uckelman, Sara L. 2016. Obligationes.” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic, edited by Catarina Dutilh-Novaes and Stephen Read, pp. 370–395. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449862.
    Spruyt, Joke and Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina. 2015. Those ‘Funny Words’: Medieval Theories of Syncategorematic Terms.” in Linguistic Content. New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language, edited by Margaret Anne Cameron and Robert J. Stainton, pp. 100–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732495.001.0001.

Further References

    Bos, Egbert Peter, ed. 2013. Medieval Supposition Theory Revisited. Leiden: E.J. Brill. Edited in collaboration with H.A.G. Braakhuis, Duba, W., Kneepkens, C.H. and Schabel, C.
    Marenbon, John, ed. 2007. The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions. Leiden: E.J. Brill.