Howard Sankey (sankey-h)

Beiträge zu Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Bird, Alexander, Ellis, Brian and Sankey, Howard, eds. 2012. Properties, Powers and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics n. 5. New York: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203124482.
Ellis, Brian, Home, Roderick, Oldroyd, David R., Nola, Robert, Sankey, Howard, Hutchison, Keith, Thomason, Neil, et al. 2014. “History and Philosophy of Science.” in History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand, volume II, pp. 707–772. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ellis, Brian, Sankey, Howard and Bird, Alexander. 2012. “Introduction.” in Properties, Powers and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism, edited by Alexander Bird, Brian Ellis, and Howard Sankey, pp. 1–7. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics n. 5. New York: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203124482.
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul and Sankey, Howard, eds. 2001. Incommensurability and Related Matters. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 216. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nola, Robert and Sankey, Howard, eds. 2000a. After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend. Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 15. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nola, Robert and Sankey, Howard. 2000b. “A Selective Survey of Theories of Scientific Method.” in After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend. Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method, edited by Robert Nola and Howard Sankey, pp. 1–66. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 15. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nola, Robert and Sankey, Howard. 2007. Theories of Scientific Method. An Introduction. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing.
Sankey, Howard. 1997. “Kuhn’s Ontological Relativism.” in Issues and Images in the Philosophy of Science. Scientific and Philosophical Essays in Honour of Azarya Polikarov, edited by Dimitri Ginev and Robert S. Cohen, pp. 305–320. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 192. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sankey, Howard, ed. 1999. Causation and the Laws of Nature. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 14. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9229-1.
Sankey, Howard. 2000. “Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science.” in After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend. Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method, edited by Robert Nola and Howard Sankey, pp. 211–230. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 15. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sankey, Howard. 2006. “Why is it Rational to Believe Scientific Theories are True?” in Rationality and Reality. Conversations with Alan Musgrave, edited by Colin Cheyne and John Worrall, pp. 109–132. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science n. 20. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sankey, Howard. 2008a. Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Sankey, Howard. 2008b. “Scientific Method.” in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, edited by Stathis Psillos and Martin Curd, pp. 248–258. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge.
Sankey, Howard. 2008c. “Scientific Realism and the Inevitability of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39(2): 259–264.
Sankey, Howard. 2008d. “Commentary on Soler’s Paper [on Soler (2008)].” in Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities?, edited by Léna Soler, Howard Sankey, and Paul Hoyningen-Huene, pp. 341–348. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 255. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sankey, Howard. 2009a. “Scientific Realism and the Semantic Incommensurability Thesis.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40(2): 196–202.
Sankey, Howard. 2009b. “A Curious Disagreement: Response to Hoyningen-Huene and Oberheim.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40(2): 210–212.
Sankey, Howard. 2011a. “Incommensurability and Theory Change.” in A Companion to Relativism, edited by Steven D. Hales, pp. 456–474. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781444392494.
Sankey, Howard. 2011b. “Epistemic Relativism and the Problem of the Criterion.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42(4): 562–570.
Sankey, Howard. 2012. “Scepticism, Relativism and the Argument from the Criterion.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43(1): 182–190.
Sankey, Howard. 2013. “How the Epistemic Relativist May Use the Sceptic’s Strategy: A Reply to Seidel (2013).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44(1): 140–144.
Sankey, Howard. 2014a. “Relativism, Particularism and Reflective Equilibrium.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45(2): 281–292.
Sankey, Howard. 2014b. “On Relativism and Pluralism: Response to Bland (2013).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 47: 98–103.
Sankey, Howard. 2017. “Kuhn, Relativism and Realism.” in The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, edited by Juha Saatsi, pp. 72–83. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203712498.
Sankey, Howard. 2018. “A Dilemma for the Scientific Realist.” Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 9(1): 65–67.
Sankey, Howard. 2020. “The Relativistic Legacy of Kuhn and Feyerabend.” in The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism, edited by Martin Kusch, pp. 379–387. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9781351052306.
Sankey, Howard and Ginev, Dimitri. 2011. “The Scope and Multidimensionality of the Scientific Realism Debate.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42(2): 263–283.
Sawyer, R. Keith, Beed, Clive and Sankey, Howard. 1997. “Underdetermination in Economics. The Duhem-Quine Thesis.” Economics and Philosophy 13(1): 1–23.
Soler, Léna, Sankey, Howard and Hoyningen-Huene, Paul, eds. 2008. Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 255. Dordrecht: Springer.

Further References

Bland, Steven. 2013. “Scepticism, Relativism, and the Structure of Epistemic Frameworks.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44(4): 539–544.
Seidel, Markus. 2013. “Why the Epistemic Relativist Cannot Use the Sceptic’s Strategy. A Comment on Sankey.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44(1): 134–139.
Soler, Léna. 2008. “The Incommensurability of Experimental Practices: An Incommensurability of What? An Incommensurability of a Third Type?” in Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities?, edited by Léna Soler, Howard Sankey, and Paul Hoyningen-Huene, pp. 299–340. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 255. Dordrecht: Springer.