Léna Soler (soler-l)
Contributi a Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Soler, Léna, ed. 2006. Philosophie de la physique. Dialogue à plusieurs voix autour de controverses contemporaines et classiques. Épistémologie et Philosophie des Sciences. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Soler, Léna. 2008a. “Are the Results of our Science Contingent or Inevitable?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39(2): 221–229.
Soler, Léna. 2008b. “Revealing the Analytical Structure and Some Intrinsic Major Difficulties of the Contingentist/Inevitabilist Issue.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39(2): 230–241.
Soler, Léna. 2008c. “Introduction.” in Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities?, edited by Léna Soler, Howard Sankey, and Paul Hoyningen-Huene, pp. 1–18. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 255. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soler, Léna. 2008d. “The Incommensurability of Experimental Practices: An Incommensurability of What? An Incommensurability of a Third Type?” in Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities?, edited by Léna Soler, Howard Sankey, and Paul Hoyningen-Huene, pp. 299–340. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 255. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soler, Léna. 2009. “The Convergence of Transcendental Philosophy and Quantum Physics: Grete Henry-Hermann’s 1935 Pioneering Proposal.” in Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics, edited by Michel Bitbol, Pierre Kerszberg, and Jean Petitot, pp. 329–346. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 74. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soler, Léna. 2012a. “Introduction: The Solidity of Scientific Achievements: Structure of the Problem, Difficulties, Philosophical Implications.” in Characterizing the Robustness of Science. After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, edited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, and William C. Wimsatt, pp. 1–60. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 292. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soler, Léna. 2012b. “Robustness of Results and Robustness of Derivations: The Internal Architecture of a Solid Experimental Proof.” in Characterizing the Robustness of Science. After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, edited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, and William C. Wimsatt, pp. 227–266. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 292. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soler, Léna, Sankey, Howard and Hoyningen-Huene, Paul, eds. 2008. Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 255. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soler, Léna, Trizio, Emiliano, Nickles, Thomas and Wimsatt, William C., eds. 2012. Characterizing the Robustness of Science. After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 292. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soler, Léna, Trizio, Emiliano and Pickering, Andrew, eds. 2015. Science as it Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Soler, Léna, Wieber, Frédéric, Allamel-Raffin, Catherine, Gangloff, Jean-Luc, Dufour, Catherine and Trizio, Emiliano. 2013. “Calibration: A Conceptual Framework Applied to Scientific Practices Which Investigate Natural Phenomena by Means of Standardized Instruments.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44(2): 263–317.
Soler, Léna, Zwart, Sjoerd D., Israel-Jost, Vincent and Lynch, Michael Patrick. 2014. “Introduction.” in Science After the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science, edited by Léna Soler, Sjoerd D. Zwart, Michael Patrick Lynch, and Vincent Israel-Jost, pp. 1–43. Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 14. London: Routledge.
Soler, Léna, Zwart, Sjoerd D., Lynch, Michael Patrick and Israel-Jost, Vincent, eds. 2014. Science After the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 14. London: Routledge.