Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/taschek

William W. Taschek (taschek)

Cited in the following articles

What is the Point of Persistent Disputes?

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Shapiro, Stewart and Taschek, William W. 1996. Intuitionism, Pluralism and Cognitive Command.” The Journal of Philosophy 93: 74–88.
    Taschek, William W. 1987. Content, Character, and Cognitive Significance.” Philosophical Studies 52: 161–189.
    Taschek, William W. 1988. Would a Fregean be Puzzled by Pierre? Mind 97(385): 99–104.
    Taschek, William W. 1992. Frege’s Puzzle, Sense, and Information Content.” Mind 101.
    Taschek, William W. 1993. Review of Crittenden (1991).” The Philosophical Review 102(4): 608–611.
    Taschek, William W. 1995. Belief, Substitution, and Logical Structure.” Noûs 29(1): 71–95, doi:10.2307/2215727.
    Taschek, William W. 1998. On Ascribing Beliefs: Content in Context.” The Journal of Philosophy 95(7): 323–353.
    Taschek, William W. 2003. Review of Stalnaker (1999).” The Journal of Philosophy 100(2): 98–108.
    Taschek, William W. 2008. Truth, Assertion, and the Horizontal: Frege on the ‘Essence of Logic’ .” Mind 117(466): 375–401.
    Taschek, William W. 2010. On Sense and Reference: A Critical Reception.” in The Cambridge Companion to Frege, edited by Michael D. Potter and Thomas G. Ricketts, pp. 293–341. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Further References

    Crittenden, Charles. 1991. Unreality: The Metaphysics of Fictional Objects. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
    Stalnaker, Robert C. 1999. Context and Content: Essays on Intensionality, Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0198237073.001.0001.