William W. Taschek (taschek)
Citato nei seguenti articoli
What is the Point of Persistent Disputes?Contributi a Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Shapiro, Stewart and Taschek, William W. 1996. “Intuitionism, Pluralism and Cognitive Command.” The Journal of Philosophy 93: 74–88.
Taschek, William W. 1987. “Content, Character, and Cognitive Significance.” Philosophical Studies 52: 161–189.
Taschek, William W. 1988. “Would a Fregean be Puzzled by Pierre?” Mind 97(385): 99–104.
Taschek, William W. 1992. “Frege’s Puzzle, Sense, and Information Content.” Mind 101.
Taschek, William W. 1993. “Review of Crittenden (1991).” The Philosophical Review 102(4): 608–611.
Taschek, William W. 1995. “Belief, Substitution, and Logical Structure.” Noûs 29(1): 71–95, doi:10.2307/2215727.
Taschek, William W. 1998. “On Ascribing Beliefs: Content in Context.” The Journal of Philosophy 95(7): 323–353.
Taschek, William W. 2003. “Review of Stalnaker (1999).” The Journal of Philosophy 100(2): 98–108.
Taschek, William W. 2008. “Truth, Assertion, and the Horizontal: Frege on the ‘Essence of Logic’ .” Mind 117(466): 375–401.
Taschek, William W. 2010. “On Sense and Reference: A Critical Reception.” in The Cambridge Companion to Frege, edited by Michael D. Potter and Thomas G. Ricketts, pp. 293–341. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Further References
Crittenden, Charles. 1991. Unreality: The Metaphysics of Fictional Objects. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1999. Context and Content: Essays on Intensionality, Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0198237073.001.0001.