Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/taschek

William W. Taschek (taschek)

Citato nei seguenti articoli

What is the Point of Persistent Disputes?

Contributi a Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Shapiro, Stewart and Taschek, William W. 1996. Intuitionism, Pluralism and Cognitive Command.” The Journal of Philosophy 93: 74–88.
    Taschek, William W. 1987. Content, Character, and Cognitive Significance.” Philosophical Studies 52: 161–189.
    Taschek, William W. 1988. Would a Fregean be Puzzled by Pierre? Mind 97(385): 99–104.
    Taschek, William W. 1992. Frege’s Puzzle, Sense, and Information Content.” Mind 101.
    Taschek, William W. 1993. Review of Crittenden (1991).” The Philosophical Review 102(4): 608–611.
    Taschek, William W. 1995. Belief, Substitution, and Logical Structure.” Noûs 29(1): 71–95, doi:10.2307/2215727.
    Taschek, William W. 1998. On Ascribing Beliefs: Content in Context.” The Journal of Philosophy 95(7): 323–353.
    Taschek, William W. 2003. Review of Stalnaker (1999).” The Journal of Philosophy 100(2): 98–108.
    Taschek, William W. 2008. Truth, Assertion, and the Horizontal: Frege on the ‘Essence of Logic’ .” Mind 117(466): 375–401.
    Taschek, William W. 2010. On Sense and Reference: A Critical Reception.” in The Cambridge Companion to Frege, edited by Michael D. Potter and Thomas G. Ricketts, pp. 293–341. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Further References

    Crittenden, Charles. 1991. Unreality: The Metaphysics of Fictional Objects. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
    Stalnaker, Robert C. 1999. Context and Content: Essays on Intensionality, Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0198237073.001.0001.