William Lane Craig (craig-wl)
Beiträge zu Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Craig, William Lane. 1953. “On Axiomatizability within a System.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 18(1): 30–32.
Craig, William Lane. 1956a. “Replacement of Auxiliary Expressions.” The Philosophical Review 65(1): 38–55.
Craig, William Lane. 1956b. “Review of Beth (1956).” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 21: 194–195.
Craig, William Lane. 1957a. “Linear Reasoning. A New Form of the Herbrand-Gentzen Theorem.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 22: 250–268.
Craig, William Lane. 1957b. “Three Uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen Theorem in Relating Model Theory and Proof Theory.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 22: 269–285.
Craig, William Lane. 1960. “Bases for First-Order Theories and Subtheories.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 25: 97–142.
Craig, William Lane. 1974a. Logic in Algebraic Form. Three Languages and Theories. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics n. 72. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
Craig, William Lane. 1974b. “Diagonal Relations.” in Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium. An International Symposium Held to Honor Alfred Tarski on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, edited by Arend Heyting, pp. 91–104. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics n. 25. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. Held at the University of California, Berkeley, June 23-30, 1971.
Craig, William Lane. 1975. “A Further Critique of Reichenbach’s Cosmological Argument [on Reichenbach (1975)].” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9(1): 53–60.
Craig, William Lane. 1977. “The Cosmological Argument and the Possibility of Infinite Temporal Regression.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59(3): 261–279.
Craig, William Lane. 1979a. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. Library of Philosophy and Religion. London: MacMillan Publishing Co.
Craig, William Lane. 1979b. “Dilley’s Misunderstandings of the Cosmological Argument.” The New Scholasticism 53(3): 388–392.
Craig, William Lane. 1979c. “Review of Rescher (1975).” Studia Leibnitiana 11(1): 157–158.
Craig, William Lane. 1979d. “Review of Salmon (1975).” Studia Leibnitiana 11(1): 154–157.
Craig, William Lane. 1980a. The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz. London: MacMillan Publishing Co.
Craig, William Lane. 1980b. “Julian Wolfe and Infinite Time [on Wolfe (1971)].” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11(2): 133–135.
Craig, William Lane. 1980c. “Review of Rowe (1975).” Studia Leibnitiana 12(2): 290–292.
Craig, William Lane. 1984. “Prof. Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 20(3): 367–375.
Craig, William Lane. 1985. “Was Thomas Aquinas a B-Theorist of Time?” The New Scholasticism 59(4): 475–483.
Craig, William Lane. 1986. “Temporal Necessity; Hard Facts/Soft Facts.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 20(2): 65–91.
Craig, William Lane. 1987. “John Duns Scotus on God’s Foreknowledge and Future Contingents.” Franciscan Studies 47: 98–122.
Craig, William Lane. 1988. The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History n. 7. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Craig, William Lane. 1990. Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom. The Coherence of Theism I: Omniscience. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History n. 19. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Craig, William Lane. 1991. “Lest Anyone should Fall: A Middle Knowledge Perspective on Perseverance and Apostolic Warnings.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 29(2): 65–74.
Craig, William Lane. 1992a. “God and the Initial Cosmological Singularity: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Faith and Philosophy 9(2): 238–248.
Craig, William Lane. 1992b. “The Origin and Creation of the Universe: A Reply to Adolf Grünbaum.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43(2): 233–240.
Craig, William Lane. 1992c. “Philosophical and Scientific Pointers to Creatio ex Nihilo.” in Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology, edited by R. Douglas Geivett and Brendan Sweetman, pp. 185–200. New York: Oxford University Press.
Craig, William Lane. 1993. “Graham Oppy on the Kalām Cosmological Argument [on Oppy (1991)].” Sophia: International journal for philosophy of religion, metaphysical theology and ethics 32(1): 1–11.
Craig, William Lane. 1994a. “Creation and Big Bang Cosmology.” Philosophia Naturalis 31(2): 217–224.
Craig, William Lane. 1994b. “A Response to Grünbaum (1994) on Creation and Big Bang Cosmology.” Philosophia Naturalis 31(2): 237–249.
Craig, William Lane. 1996. “Timelessness and Creation.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 646–656.
Craig, William Lane. 1997. “On the Argument for Divine Timelessness from the Incompleteness of Temporal Life.” The Heythrop Journal 38: 165–171.
Craig, William Lane. 1998a. “The Tensed vs. the Tenseless Theory of Time: A Watershed for the Conception of Divine Eternity.” in Questions of Time and Tense, edited by Robin Le Poidevin, pp. 221–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198236955.001.0001.
Craig, William Lane. 1998b. “Divine Timelessness and Personhood.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43(2): 109–124.
Craig, William Lane. 1998c. “Creation, Providence and Miracles.” in Philosophy of Religion. A Guide to the Subject, edited by Brian Davies, pp. 136–162. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Craig, William Lane. 1999a. “A Swift and Simple Refutation of the Kalām Cosmological Argument?” Religious Studies 35(1): 57–72.
Craig, William Lane. 1999b. “Tensed Time and our Differential Experience of the Past and the Future.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 37.
Craig, William Lane. 1999c. “The Eternal Present and Stump-Kretzmann Eternity.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73(4): 521–536.
Craig, William Lane. 1999d. “ ‘Men Moved By the Holy Spirit Spoke From God’ (2 Peter 1.21): A Middle Knowledge Perspective on Biblical Inspiration.” Philosophia Christi 2(1). Reprinted in Rea (2009b, 157–191).
Craig, William Lane. 2000a. The Tensed Theory of Time. A Critical Examination. Synthese Library n. 293. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Craig, William Lane. 2000b. The Tenseless Theory of Time. A Critical Examination. Synthese Library n. 294. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Craig, William Lane. 2000c. “Why is it Now?” Ratio 13(2): 115–122.
Craig, William Lane. 2000d. “Naturalism and Cosmology.” in Naturalism. A Critical Analysis, edited by William Lane Craig and James Porter Moreland, pp. 215–252. Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy n. 6. London: Routledge.
Craig, William Lane. 2001a. Time and the Metaphysics of Relativity. Philosophical Studies Series n. 84. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Craig, William Lane. 2001b. Time and Eternity. Exploring God’s Relation to Time. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books.
Craig, William Lane. 2001c. God, Time, and Eternity. The Coherence of Theism II: Eternity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Craig, William Lane. 2001d. “Tense and Temporal Relations.” American Philosophical Quarterly 38(1): 85–97.
Craig, William Lane. 2001e. “On the Alleged Metaphysical Superiority of Timelessness.” in The Importance of Time – Proceedings of the Philosophy of Time Society 1995–2000, edited by L. Nathan Oaklander, pp. 181–186. Philosophical Studies Series n. 87. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Craig, William Lane. 2001f. “Wishing It Were Now Some Other Time.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62(1): 159–166.
Craig, William Lane. 2001g. “McTaggart’s Paradox and Temporal Solipsism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79.
Craig, William Lane. 2001h. “Middle Knowledge, Truth-Makers, and the ‘Grounding Objection’ .” Faith and Philosophy 18. Reprinted in Rea (2009b, 68–83).
Craig, William Lane. 2002. “The Elimination of Absolute Time by the Special Theory of Relativity.” in God and Time. Essays on the Divine Nature, edited by Gregory E. Ganssle and David M. Woodruff, pp. 129–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195129656.001.0001.
Craig, William Lane. 2003a. “In Defense of Presentism.” in Time, Tense and Reference, edited by Aleksandar Jokić and Quentin Smith, pp. 391–408. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Craig, William Lane. 2003b. “Toward a Tenable Social Trinitarianism.” in Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview, pp. 583–594. Downers Grove, Illinois: Intervarsity Press. Reprinted, in slightly revised form, in McCall and Rea (2009, 89–99).
Craig, William Lane. 2003c. “Design and the Anthropic Fine-Tuning of the Universe.” in God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, edited by Neil A. Manson, pp. 155–177. London: Routledge.
Craig, William Lane. 2004. “Contemporary Cosmology and the Existence of God.” in Analytic Philosophy Without Naturalism, edited by Antonella Corradini, Sergio Galvan, and Edward Jonathan Lowe, pp. 97–133. Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy n. 27. London: Routledge.
Craig, William Lane. 2005. “Does the Problem of Material Constitution Illuminate the Doctrine of the Trinity? [on Brower and Rea (2005)].” Faith and Philosophy 22(1): 77–86. Reprinted in McCall and Rea (2009, 283–292).
Craig, William Lane. 2006. “J. Howard Sobel on the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36(4): 565–584.
Craig, William Lane. 2007a. “The Metaphysics of Special Relativity: Three Views.” in Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity, edited by William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith, pp. 11–49. Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy n. 4. London: Routledge.
Craig, William Lane. 2007b. “Theistic Critiques of Atheism.” in The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, edited by Michael Martin, pp. 69–85. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Craig, William Lane. 2009a. “Divine Eternity.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, edited by Thomas P. Flint and Michael C. Rea, pp. 145–166. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, William Lane. 2009b. “Another Glance at Trinity Monotheism.” in Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity, edited by Thomas McCall and Michael C. Rea, pp. 126–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, William Lane. 2010. “Theism and Physical Cosmology.” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Religion, edited by R. Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, and Philip L. Quinn, 2nd ed., pp. 539–547. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Craig, William Lane. 2011a. “Graham Oppy on the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” International Philosophical Quarterly 51(3): 303–330.
Craig, William Lane. 2011b. “Yet Another Failed Anti-Molinist Argument [on Zimmerman (2009)].” in Molinism. The Contemporary Debate, edited by Kenneth J. Perszyk, pp. 144–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590629.001.0001.
Craig, William Lane. 2011c. “Divine Eternity and Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity.” in God, Eternity, and Time, edited by Christian Tapp and Edmund Runggaldier, pp. 145–156. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Craig, William Lane. 2013a. “The Kalām Argument.” in Debating Christian Theism, edited by James Porter Moreland, Khaldoun A. Sweis, and Chad Meister, pp. 7–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, William Lane. 2013b. “Creation and Divine Action.” in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Chad Meister and Paul Copan, pp. 378–387. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge. First edition: Meister and Copan (2007).
Craig, William Lane. 2014a. “Divine Self-Existence.” in Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics, edited by Daniel D. Novotný and Lukáš Novák, pp. 269–297. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics n. 8. London: Routledge.
Craig, William Lane. 2014b. “Response to Yandell (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 39–41. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2014c. “Response to Gould and Davis (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 68–69. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2014d. “Response to Welty (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 100–101. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2014e. “Anti-Platonism.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 113–126. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2014f. “Response to Critics [Yandell (2014b), Gould and Davis (2014b), Welty (2014b), Shalkowski (2014a), Oppy (2014a)].” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 137–142. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2014g. “Response to Shalkowski (2014b).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 160–161. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2014h. “Response to Oppy (2014b).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 187–188. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 2016. God Over All. Divine Aseity and the Challenge of Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, William Lane and Meister, Chad, eds. 2009. God is Great, God is Good. Why Believing in God is Reasonable and Responsible. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press.
Craig, William Lane and Moreland, James Porter, eds. 2000. Naturalism. A Critical Analysis. Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy n. 6. London: Routledge.
Craig, William Lane and Moreland, James Porter, eds. 2009. The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Blackwell Philosophy Guides. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781444308334.
Craig, William Lane and Quine, Willard van Orman. 1952. “On Reduction to a Symmetric Relation.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 17(3): 188.
Craig, William Lane and Sinclair, James D. 2009. “The kalām Cosmological Argument.” in The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, edited by William Lane Craig and James Porter Moreland, pp. 101–201. Blackwell Philosophy Guides. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781444308334.
Craig, William Lane and Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2004. God? A Debate between a Christian and a Atheist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, William Lane and Smith, Quentin. 1993. Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Craig, William Lane and Smith, Quentin, eds. 2007a. Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity. Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy n. 4. London: Routledge.
Craig, William Lane and Smith, Quentin. 2007b. “Introduction.” in Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity, edited by William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith, pp. 1–10. Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy n. 4. London: Routledge.
Further References
Brower, Jeffrey E. and Rea, Michael C. 2005. “Material Constitution and the Trinity.” Faith and Philosophy 22(1): 57–76. Reprinted in McCall and Rea (2009, 249–262) and in Rea (2009a, 127–148).
Gould, Paul M. and Davis, Richard Brian. 2014a. “Response to Yandell (2014a).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 36–37. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gould, Paul M. and Davis, Richard Brian. 2014b. “Response to Craig (2014e).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 128–129. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Grünbaum, Adolf. 1994. “Some Comments on Craig (1994a).” Philosophia Naturalis 31(2): 225–236.
McCall, Thomas and Rea, Michael C., eds. 2009. Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 1991. “Craig, Mackie, and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 27(2): 189–197.
Oppy, Graham. 2014a. “Response to Craig (2014e).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 134–136. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Oppy, Graham. 2014b. “Abstract Objects? Who Cares!” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 169–181. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Rea, Michael C., ed. 2009a. Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement. Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology n. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rea, Michael C., ed. 2009b. Providence, Scripture, and Resurrection. Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology n. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reichenbach, Bruce R. 1975. “The Cosmological Argument and the Causal Principle.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6(3): 185–190.
Rescher, Nicholas. 1975. A Theory of Possibility. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
Rowe, William L. 1975. The Cosmological Argument. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Salmon, Wesley C. 1975. Space, Time and Motion: A Philosophical Introduction. Encino, California: Dickenson Publishing Co.
Shalkowski, Scott A. 2014a. “Response to Craig (2014e).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 132–133. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Shalkowski, Scott A. 2014b. “God with or without Abstract Objects.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 143–154. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Welty, Greg. 2014a. “Theistic Conceptual Realism.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 81–96. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Welty, Greg. 2014b. “Response to Craig (2014e).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 130–131. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Wolfe, Julian M. 1971. “Infinite Regress and the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2(4): 246–249.
Yandell, Keith E. 2014a. “God and Propositions.” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 21–35. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Yandell, Keith E. 2014b. “Response to Craig (2014e).” in Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects, edited by Paul M. Gould, pp. 127. Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Zimmerman, Dean W. 2009. “Yet Another Anti-Molinist Argument.” in Metaphysics and the Good. Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams, edited by Samuel Newlands and Larry M. Jorgensen, pp. 33–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199542680.001.0001.