Michael Raymond dePaul (depaul-mr)
My contributions to Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 1984.
“The Thesis of the Second
Antinomy.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 1(4):
445–452.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 1987.
“Supervenience and Moral
Dependence.” Philosophical Studies 51: 425–439.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 1988.
“The Problem of the Criterion and Coherence
Methods in Ethics.” Canadian Journal of
Philosophy 18: 67–86.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 1993. Balance and Refinement. Beyond Coherence. Methods of
Moral Inquiry. London: Routledge.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 1998.
“Why Bother with Reflective
Equilibrium?” in Rethinking
Intuition, edited by Michael Raymond dePaul and William M. Ramsey, pp. 293–309. Studies in epistemology and cognitive theory.
Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
dePaul, Michael Raymond, ed. 2000.
Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism.
Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2001.
“Value Monism in Epistemology.”
in Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on
Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue, edited
by Matthias Steup, pp. 170–185. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195128923.001.0001.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2002a.
“Review of Goldman (1999).”
Noûs 36(2): 335–350.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2002b.
“A Half Dozen Puzzles regarding Intrinsic
Attitudinal Hedonism [on Feldman (2002)].”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65(3): 629–635.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2004.
“Truth Consequentialism, Withholding and
Proportioning Belief to the Evidence.” in
Philosophical Issues 14: Epistemology, edited by
Ernest Sosa and Enrique Villanueva, pp. 91–112. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2006.
“Intuitions in Moral Inquiry.”
in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical
Theory, edited by David Copp,
pp. 595–623. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, doi:10.1093/0195147790.001.0001.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2009a.
“Pyrrhonian Moral Skepticism and the Problem
of the Criterion.” in Philosophical Issues 19:
Metaethics, edited by Ernest Sosa and Enrique Villanueva, pp. 38–56. Malden, Massachusetts:
Wiley-Blackwell.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2009b.
“Ugly Analyses and Value.” in
Epistemic Value, edited by Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar, and Duncan Pritchard, pp. 112–138. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231188.001.0001.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2009c.
“Phenomenal Conservatism and Self-Defeat [on
Huemer
(2005)].” Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research 78(1): 205–212.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2011.
“Foundationalism.” in The Routledge Companion to Epistemology,
edited by Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard, pp. 235–244. Routledge
Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge.
dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2013.
“Agent Centeredness, Agent Neutrality,
Disagreement, and Truth Conduciveness.” in Seemings and Justification. New Essays on Dogmatism and
Phenomenal Conservatism, edited by Christopher Tucker, pp. 202–224. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899494.001.0001.
dePaul, Michael Raymond and Grimm, Stephen R. 2007. “Review Essay on Kvanvig (2003).”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74(2): 498–514.
dePaul, Michael Raymond and Hicks, Amelia. 2016. “A Priorism in Moral Epistemology.” in
The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research
Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/moral-epistemology-a-priori/.
dePaul, Michael Raymond and Hicks, Amelia. 2021. “A Priorism in Moral Epistemology.” in
The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research
Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/moral-epistemology-a-priori/.
dePaul, Michael Raymond and Ramsey, William M., eds. 1998.
Rethinking Intuition. Studies
in epistemology and cognitive theory. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman
& Littlefield.
dePaul, Michael Raymond and Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus, eds. 2003. Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and
Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252732.001.0001.
Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus and dePaul, Michael Raymond. 2003.
“Introduction.” in Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and
Epistemology, edited by Michael Raymond dePaul and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski, pp. 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252732.001.0001.
Further References
Feldman, Fred. 2002. “Comments on Two of DePaul’s Puzzles [on dePaul
(2002b)].” Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research 65(3): 636–639.
Goldman, Alvin I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, doi:10.1093/0198238207.001.0001.
Huemer, Michael. 2005. Ethical
Intuitionism. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan,
doi:10.1007/978-0-230-50317-5.
Kvanvig, Jonathan L. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of
Understanding. Cambridge Studies in
Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.