Stephen Read (read-s)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Aberdein, Andrew and Read, Stephen. 2009. “The Philosophy of Alternative Logics.” in The Development of Modern Logic, edited by Leila Haaparanta, pp. 613–723. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137316.001.0001.
Béziau, Jean-Yves and Read, Stephen. 2014. “Square of Opposition: A Diagram and a Theory in Historical Perspective.” History and Philosophy of Logic 35(4): 315–316.
Clark, Peter and Read, Stephen. 1984. “Hypertasks.” Synthese 61(3): 387–390.
Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Read, Stephen. 2008. “Insolubilia and the Fallacy Secundum Quid et Simpliciter.” Vivarium 46(2): 175–191.
Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Read, Stephen, eds. 2016a. The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449862.
Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina and Read, Stephen. 2016b. “Introduction.” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic, edited by Catarina Dutilh-Novaes and Stephen Read, pp. 1–17. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449862.
Haldane, John and Read, Stephen, eds. 2002. The Philosophy of Thomas Reid. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Priest, Graham and Read, Stephen. 1977. “The Formalization of Ockham’s Theory of Supposition.” Mind 86: 109–113.
Priest, Graham and Read, Stephen. 1980. “Merely Confused Supposition: A Theoretical Advance or a Mere Confusion?” Franciscan Studies 40: 265–297.
Priest, Graham and Read, Stephen. 1981. “Ockham’s Rejection of Ampliation.” Mind 90: 274–279.
Read, Stephen. 1976. “Review of Montague (1974).” The Philosophical Quarterly 26(103): 182–185.
Read, Stephen. 1977a. “The Objective Being of Ockham’s Ficta.” The Philosophical Quarterly 27(106): 14–31.
Read, Stephen. 1977b. “The Logical Form of Referring Expressions.” in Papers on Logic and Language, edited by David Holdcroft, pp. 9–32. Lynchburg, Va.: Warwick House Pub.
Read, Stephen. 1978. “Identity and Reference.” Mind 87: 533–552.
Read, Stephen. 1979. “Self-Reference and Validity.” Synthese 42: 265–274.
Read, Stephen. 1980. “ ‘Exists’ is a Predicate.” Mind 89: 412–417.
Read, Stephen. 1981a. “What is Wrong with Disjunctive Syllogism?” Analysis 41(2): 66–70.
Read, Stephen. 1981b. “Validity and the Intensional Sense of ‘And’ .” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59: 301–307.
Read, Stephen. 1982. “Disjunction.” Journal of Semantics 1(3–4): 275–285.
Read, Stephen. 1983. “Burgess on Relevance: A Fallacy Indeed.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24(4): 473–481.
Read, Stephen. 1988. Relevant Logic. A Philosophical Examination of Inference. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Read, Stephen. 1991. “Thomas of Cleves and Collective Supposition.” Vivarium 29(1): 50–84.
Read, Stephen. 1992. “Indicative Conditionals are Not Truth-Functional: An Argument from Peirce.” Analysis 52: 5–12.
Read, Stephen, ed. 1993a. Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series n. 48. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics, held at St Andrews, June 1990.
Read, Stephen. 1993b. “The Slingshot Argument.” Logique et Analyse 36(143–144): 195–218.
Read, Stephen. 1994. “Formal and Material Consequence.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 23(3): 247–265, doi:10.1007/bf01048482.
Read, Stephen. 1995a. Thinking about Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Read, Stephen. 1995b. “Conditionals and the Ramsey Test.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 69: 47–65.
Read, Stephen. 1997a. “Quotation and Reach’s Puzzle.” Acta Analytica 12(19): 9–20.
Read, Stephen. 1997b. “Completeness and Categoricity: Frege, Gödel and Model Theory.” History and Philosophy of Logic 18: 79–93.
Read, Stephen. 1999a. “Farewell to Opacity.” Unpublished manuscript.
Read, Stephen. 1999b. “How is Material Supposition Possible?” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8(1): 1–20.
Read, Stephen. 2000a. “Harmony and Autonomy in Classical Logic.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 29(2): 123–154, doi:10.1023/a:1004787622057.
Read, Stephen. 2000b. “Truthmakers and the Disjunction Thesis.” Mind 109(433): 67–79.
Read, Stephen. 2001a. “Truthmakers, Entailment and Necessity.” in Essays on Non-Classical Logics, edited by Heinrich Theodor Wansing, pp. 91–110. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Read, Stephen. 2001b. “Self-Reference and Validity Revisited.” in Medieval Formal Logic. Obligations, Insolubles and Consequences, edited by Mikko Yrjönsuuri, pp. 183–196. The New Synthese Historical Library n. 49. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Read, Stephen. 2002a. “The Liar Paradox from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine.” Vivarium 40(2): 189–218.
Read, Stephen. 2002b. “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2002/entries/medieval-terms/.
Read, Stephen. 2003a. “Freeing Assumptions from the Liar Paradox.” Analysis 63: 162–166.
Read, Stephen. 2003b. “Logical Consequence as Truth Preservation.” Logique et Analyse 46(183–184): 479–493.
Read, Stephen. 2004. “In Defense of the Dog: Response to Restall (2004).” in Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, volume 1, edited by Shahid Rahman, John Symons, Dov M. Gabbay, and Jean Paul van Bendegem, pp. 175–180. Dordrecht: Springer.
Read, Stephen. 2005. “The Unity of the Fact.” Philosophy 80: 317–342.
Read, Stephen. 2006a. “Symmetry and Paradox.” History and Philosophy of Logic 27(4): 307–318.
Read, Stephen. 2006b. “Monism: The One True Logic.” in A Logical Approach to Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Graham Solomon, edited by David DeVidi and Timothy Kenyon, pp. 193–209. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 69. Dordrecht: Springer, doi:10.1007/1-4020-4054-7_10.
Read, Stephen. 2006c. “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2006/entries/medieval-terms/.
Read, Stephen. 2008a. “The Truth Schema and the Liar.” in Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox, edited by Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, and Emmanuel J. Genot, pp. 3–18. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 8. Berlin: Springer.
Read, Stephen. 2008b. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-Scheme and the Liar.” in Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox, edited by Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, and Emmanuel J. Genot, pp. 205–227. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 8. Berlin: Springer.
Read, Stephen. 2009a. “Le pouvoir de la logique: La conséquence logique.” in Philosophie de la logique: Conséquence, preuve et vérité, edited by Denis Bonnay and Mikaël Cozic, pp. 105–130. Textes clés. Paris: Librairie philosophique Jean Vrin. Traduction du deuxième chapitre de Read (1995a).
Read, Stephen. 2009b. “Plural Signification and the Liar Paradox.” Philosophical Studies 145(3): 363–375.
Read, Stephen. 2010a. “Field’s Paradox and Its Medieval Solution.” History and Philosophy of Logic 31(2): 161–176.
Read, Stephen. 2010b. “General-Elimination Harmony and the Meaning of the Logical Constants.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 39(5): 557–576.
Read, Stephen. 2010c. “Inferences.” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, volume I, edited by Robert Pasnau and Christina van Dyke, pp. 173–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Read, Stephen. 2010d. “The Validity Paradox.” in The Logica Yearbook 2009, edited by Michal Peliš, pp. 209–222. London: College Publications.
Read, Stephen. 2010e. “Necessary Truth and Proof.” Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 51(121): 47–67, doi:10.1590/S0100-512X2010000100003.
Read, Stephen. 2011. “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/medieval-terms/.
Read, Stephen. 2012. “The Medieval Theory of Consequence.” Synthese 187(3): 899–912.
Read, Stephen. 2015a. “Proof-Theoretic Validity.” in Foundations of Logical Consequence, edited by Colin R. Caret and Ole Thomassen Hjortland, pp. 136–159. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715696.001.0001.
Read, Stephen. 2015b. “Truth, Signification and Paradox.” in Unifying the Philosophy of Truth, edited by Theodora Achourioti, Henri Galinon, José Martı́nez Fernández, and Kentaro Fujimoto, pp. 393–408. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 36. Cham: Springer.
Read, Stephen. 2015c. “Richard Kilvington and the Theory of Obligations.” Vivarium 53(2–4): 391–404.
Read, Stephen. 2015d. “Concepts and Meaning in Medieval Philosophy.” in Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy, edited by Gyula Klima, pp. 9–28. New York: Fordham University Press, doi:10.5422/fordham/9780823262748.001.0001.
Read, Stephen. 2015e. “Review of Parsons (2014).” Mind 124(496): 1353–1356.
Read, Stephen. 2015f. “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/medieval-terms/.
Read, Stephen. 2016a. “Paradoxes of Signification.” Vivarium 54(4): 335–355.
Read, Stephen. 2016b. “Logic in the Latin West in the Fourteenth Century.” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic, edited by Catarina Dutilh-Novaes and Stephen Read, pp. 142–165. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449862.
Read, Stephen. 2016c. “Non-Normal Propositions in Buridan’s Logic.” in Formal Approaches and Natural Language in Medieval Logic. Proceedings of the XIXth European Symposium of Medieval Logic and Semantics, Geneva, 12-16 June 2012, edited by Laurent Cesalli, Frédéric Goubier, and Alain de Libera, pp. 453–468. Textes et Études du Moyen Âge n. 82. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
Read, Stephen. 2019a. “Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic.” Australasian Journal of Logic 16(9): 298–318, doi:10.26686/ajl.v16i7.5926.
Read, Stephen. 2019b. “Denotation, Paradox and Multiple Meanings.” in Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, edited by Can Başkent and Thomas Macaulay Ferguson, pp. 439–454. Cham: Springer Nature, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25365-3.
Read, Stephen. 2019c. “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/medieval-terms/.
Read, Stephen. 2021. “Modality in Medieval Philosophy.” in The Routledge Handbook of Modality, edited by Otávio Bueno and Scott A. Shalkowski, pp. 344–354. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Read, Stephen. 2023. “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/medieval-terms/.
Read, Stephen and Wright, C. J. G. 1985. “Hairier than Putnam Thought.” Analysis 45(1): 56–58.
Spade, Paul Vincent and Read, Stephen. 2009. “Insolubles.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/insolubles/.
Spade, Paul Vincent and Read, Stephen. 2013. “Insolubles.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/insolubles/.
Spade, Paul Vincent and Read, Stephen. 2017. “Insolubles.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/insolubles/.
Spade, Paul Vincent and Read, Stephen. 2021. “Insolubles.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/insolubles/.

Further References

Montague, Richard. 1974. Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. Edited and with an introduction by Richmond H. Thomason.
Parsons, Terence D. 2014. Articulating Medieval Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688845.001.0001.
Restall, Greg. 2004. “Logical Pluralism and the Preservation of Warrant.” in Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, volume 1, edited by Shahid Rahman, John Symons, Dov M. Gabbay, and Jean Paul van Bendegem, pp. 163–174. Dordrecht: Springer.