Michael McKenna (mckenna-m)
My contributions to Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Clarke, Randolph, McKenna, Michael and Smith, Angela M., eds. 2015a. The Nature of Moral Responsibility. New
Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199998074.001.0001.
Clarke, Randolph, McKenna, Michael and Smith, Angela M. 2015b.
“Introduction.” in The Nature of Moral Responsibility. New
Essays, edited by Randolph Clarke, Michael McKenna, and Angela M. Smith, pp. 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199998074.001.0001.
Haji, Isthiyaque and McKenna, Michael. 2004. “Dialectical Difficulties in the Debate about Freedom and
Alternative Possibilities.” The Journal of
Philosophy 101(6): 299–314, doi:10.5840/jphil2004101616.
Haji, Isthiyaque and McKenna, Michael. 2006. “Defending Frankfurt’s Argument in Deterministic Contexts:
A Reply to Palmer
(2005).” The Journal of Philosophy 103(7):
363–372, doi:10.5840/jphil2006103715.
Haji, Isthiyaque and McKenna, Michael. 2011. “Disabling Levy’s Frankfurt-Style Enabling
Cases.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92(3):
400–414.
Levy, Neil and McKenna, Michael. 2007. “Symposium on Free Will and Luck.”
Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the
Philosophy of Mind and Action 10(2): 151–152.
McKenna, Michael. 2000.
“Assessing Reasons – Responsive
Compatibilism.” International Journal of Philosophical
Studies 8(1): 89–114.
McKenna, Michael. 2001a. “Review of Fischer and Ravizza
(1998).” The Journal of Philosophy 98(2):
93–100.
McKenna, Michael. 2001b. “Source Incompatibilism, Ultimacy, and the Transfer of
Non-Responsibility.” American Philosophical
Quarterly 38(1): 37–51.
McKenna, Michael. 2002. “Review of Mele (1995).” The
Philosophical Review 111(4): 612–615.
McKenna, Michael. 2004a. “Responsibility and Globally Manipulated
Agents.” Philosophical Topics 32(1–2): 169–192.
McKenna, Michael. 2004b.
“Compatibilism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2004/entries/compatibilism/.
McKenna, Michael. 2005a. “Where Frankfurt and Strawson Meet.” in
Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29: Free Will and
Moral Responsibility, edited by Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein, pp. 163–180. Boston, Massachusetts:
Blackwell Publishers.
McKenna, Michael. 2005b. “Reasons Reactivity and Incompatibilist
Intuitions.” Philosophical Explorations: An
International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action 8(2):
131–143.
McKenna, Michael. 2005c. “The Relationship between Autonomous and Morally
Responsible Agency.” in Personal
Autonomy. New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary
Moral Philosophy, edited by James Stacey Taylor, pp. 205–234. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
McKenna, Michael. 2006. “Collective Responsibility and an Agent Meaning
Theory.” in Midwest Studies in
Philosophy 30: Shared Intentions and Collective
Responsibility, edited by Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein, pp. 16–34. Boston, Massachusetts:
Blackwell Publishers.
McKenna, Michael. 2008a. “Saying Good-Bye to the Direct Argument the Right
Way.” The Philosophical Review 117(3): 349–383.
McKenna, Michael. 2008b. “Putting the Lie on the Control Condition for Moral
Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 139(1):
29–37.
McKenna, Michael. 2008c. “A Hard-line Reply to Pereboom’s Four-Case Manipulation
Argument.” Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research 77(1): 142–159.
McKenna, Michael. 2009a. “Recent Work on Free Will and Moral
Responsibility.” Philosophy Compass 4(1): 96–133.
McKenna, Michael. 2009b.
“Compatibilism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/compatibilism/.
McKenna, Michael. 2009c. “Compatibilism & Desert: Critical Comments on
‘Four Views on Free Will’ .”
Philosophical Studies 144(1): 3–13.
McKenna, Michael. 2011. “Contemporary Compatibilism: Mesh Theories and
Reasons-Responsive Theories.” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, edited by
Robert H. Kane, 2nd ed., pp. 175–198.
Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press.
First edition: Kane (2002), doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001.
McKenna, Michael. 2012a. Conversation and Responsibility. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740031.001.0001.
McKenna, Michael. 2012b. “Defending Nonhistorical Compatibilism: A Reply to Haji
and Cuypers.” in Philosophical Issues 22: Action
Theory, edited by Ernest Sosa, Enrique Villanueva, and Berit Brogaard, pp. 264–280. Malden, Massachusetts:
Wiley-Blackwell.
McKenna, Michael. 2013a. “Source Compatibilism and That Pesky Ability to Do
Otherwise: Comments on Dana Nelkin’s Making Sense of Freedom and
Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 163(1):
105–116.
McKenna, Michael. 2013b. “Reasons-Responsiveness, Agents, and
Mechanisms.” in Oxford Studies in
Agency and Responsibility, volume I, edited by David W.
Shoemaker, pp. 151–183. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694853.001.0001.
McKenna, Michael. 2014a. “The Metaphysical Importance of the Compatibility
Question: Comments on Mark Balaguer’s Free Will as an Open Scientific
Problem.” Philosophical Studies 169(1): 39–50.
McKenna, Michael. 2014b. “Defending Conversation and Responsibility: Reply to Dana
Nelkin and Holly Smith.” Philosophical Studies
171(1): 73–84.
McKenna, Michael. 2015. “In Defense of a Challenge to Moral Responsability
Skepticism: A Reply to Levy.” in Agency, Freedom, and Moral Responsibility,
edited by Andrei A. Buckareff, Carlos J.
Moya, and Sergi Rosell, pp. 204–206. London: Palgrave
Macmillan.
McKenna, Michael. 2019.
“Watsonian Compatibilism.” in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. Themes from
the Philosophy of Gary Watson, volume V, edited by D. Justin
Coates and Neal A. Tognazzini, pp. 5–37. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198830238.001.0001.
McKenna, Michael. 2023. “A Timid Response to the Consequence
Argument.” in Philosophical
Issues 33: The Philosophy of Action, edited by Michael McKenna and Carolina Sartorio, pp. 155–169. Hoboken, New Jersey:
John Wiley; Sons, Inc., doi:10.1111/phis.12250.
McKenna, Michael and Coates, D. Justin. 2015.
“Compatibilism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/compatibilism/.
McKenna, Michael and Coates, D. Justin. 2019.
“Compatibilism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/compatibilism/.
McKenna, Michael and Coates, D. Justin. 2024.
“Compatibilism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study
of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/compatibilism/.
McKenna, Michael and Sartorio, Carolina, eds. 2023. Philosophical Issues 33: The Philosophy of
Action. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; Sons, Inc.
McKenna, Michael and Schoelandt, Chad van. 2015. “Crossing a Mesh Theory with a Reasons-Responsive Theory:
Unholy Spawn of an Impending Apocalypse or Love Child a New
Dawn?” in Agency, Freedom, and
Moral Responsibility, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff, Carlos J. Moya, and Sergi Rosell, pp. 44–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Warmke, Brandon, Nelkin, Dana Kay and McKenna, Michael, eds. 2021. Forgiveness and Its Moral Dimensions. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780190602147.001.0001.
Further References
Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral
Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814594.
Mele, Alfred R. 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to
Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195150430.001.0001.
Palmer, David D. 2005. “New Distinctions, Same Troubles: A Reply to Haji and McKenna
(2004).” The Journal of Philosophy 102(9):
474–482, doi:10.5840/jphil2005102934.