Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://philosophie.ch/profil/priest-g

Graham Priest (priest-g)

My contributions to Philosophie.ch

No contributions yet

Bibliography

    Batens, Diderik, Mortensen, Chris David, Priest, Graham and Bendegem, Jean Paul van. 1998. Editorial Preface.” Logique et Analyse 41(161–163): 3–4.
    Batens, Diderik, Mortensen, Chris David, Priest, Graham and Bendegem, Jean Paul van, eds. 2000. Frontiers in Paraconsistent Logics. Studies in Logic and Computation n. 8. Baldock: Research Studies Press.
    Beall, J. C., Priest, Graham and Weber, Zach. 2011. Can U Do This? Analysis 71(2): 280–286.
    Benham, Richard, Mortensen, Chris David and Priest, Graham. 2014. Chunk and Permeate III: The Dirac Delta Function.” Synthese 191(13): 3057–3062.
    Berto, Francesco and Priest, Graham. 2015. Modal Meinongianism and Characterization. Reply to Kroon.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 90: 183–200. “The second-Person Standpoint in Law and Morality,” ed. by Christoph Hanisch and Herlinde Pauer-Studer.
    Bliss, Ricki Leigh and Priest, Graham, eds. 2018a. Reality and its Structure. Essays in Fundamentality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198755630.001.0001.
    Bliss, Ricki Leigh and Priest, Graham. 2018b. The Geography of Fundamentality: An Overview.” in Reality and its Structure. Essays in Fundamentality, edited by Ricki Leigh Bliss and Graham Priest, pp. 1–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198755630.003.0001.
    Brown, Bryson and Priest, Graham. 2004. Chunk and Permeate, a Paraconsistent Inference Strategy. Part I: The Infinitesimal Calculus.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 33(4): 379–388.
    Colyvan, Mark, Garfield, Jay L. and Priest, Graham. 2005. Problems with the Argument From Fine Tuning.” Synthese 145(3): 325–338.
    Crosthwaite, Jan and Priest, Graham. 1996. The Definition of Sexual Harassment.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 66–82.
    Deguchi, Yasuo, Garfield, Jay L., Priest, Graham and Sharf, Robert H. 2021. What Can’t be Said: Paradox and Contradiction in East Asian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780197526187.001.0001.
    Garfield, Jay L. and Priest, Graham. 2021. Skill and Virtuosity in Buddhist and Daoist Philosophy.” in The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Skill and Expertise, edited by Ellen R. Fridland and Carlotta Pavese, pp. 29–39. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
    Jackson, Frank and Priest, Graham, eds. 2004. Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David Lewis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199274550.001.0001.
    Mackenzie, Jim and Priest, Graham. 1990. Paraconsistent Dialogues; Or, How to Start Talking to Cretans.” Logique et Analyse 33(131–132): 339–357.
    Mortensen, Chris David and Priest, Graham. 1981. The Truth Teller Paradox.” Logique et Analyse 24(95–96): 381–388.
    Mortensen, Chris David and Priest, Graham. 1992. Contemporary Australian Research in Logic. Introduction.” Logique et Analyse 35(137–138): 3–4.
    Priest, Graham. 1975. Review of Haack (1974).” The Philosophical Quarterly 25(101): 371–373.
    Priest, Graham. 1976a. Modality as a Meta-concept.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17: 401–414.
    Priest, Graham. 1976b. Review of Steiner (1975).” The Philosophical Quarterly 26(104): 281–282.
    Priest, Graham. 1976c. Gruesome Simplicity.” Philosophy of Science 43: 432–437. Reprinted in Elgin (1997, 152–158).
    Priest, Graham. 1977. A Refoundation of Modal Logic.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18: 340–354.
    Priest, Graham. 1979a. The Logic of Paradox.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 8(2): 219–241, doi:10.1007/bf00258428.
    Priest, Graham. 1979b. A Note on the Sorites Paradox.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57(1): 74–75.
    Priest, Graham. 1979c. Indefinite Descriptions.” Logique et Analyse 22(85–86): 5–21.
    Priest, Graham. 1980. Sense, Entailment and Modus Ponens.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 9(4): 415–435.
    Priest, Graham. 1983. An Anti-Realist Account of Mathematical Truth.” Synthese 57: 49–65.
    Priest, Graham. 1984a. Logic of Paradox Revisited.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 13(2): 153–179.
    Priest, Graham. 1984b. Hyper-Contradictions.” Logique et Analyse 27(107): 237–243.
    Priest, Graham. 1985. Hume’s Final Argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2(3): 349–352.
    Priest, Graham. 1986. Contradiction, Belief and Rationality.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86: 99–116.
    Priest, Graham. 1987a. In Contradiction. A Study of the Transconsistent. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series n. 39. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    Priest, Graham. 1987b. Unstable Solutions to the Liar Paradox.” in Self-Reference – Reflections on Reflexivity, edited by Steven J. Bartlett and Peter Suber, pp. 145–175. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library n. 21. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    Priest, Graham. 1989a. Reasoning about Truth.” Artificial Intelligence 39: 231–244.
    Priest, Graham. 1989b. Review of Jackson (1987).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67: 236–239.
    Priest, Graham. 1990. Boolean Negation and All That.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 19(2): 201–215.
    Priest, Graham. 1991a. Intensional Paradoxes.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32: 193–211.
    Priest, Graham. 1991b. Sorites and Identity.” Logique et Analyse 34(135–136): 293–296.
    Priest, Graham. 1992. What is a Non-Normal World? Logique et Analyse 35(139–140): 291–302.
    Priest, Graham. 1993a. Another Disguise of the Same Fundamental Problems: Barwise and Etchemendy on the Liar.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71: 60–69.
    Priest, Graham. 1993b. Can Contradictions Be True? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 67: 35–54.
    Priest, Graham. 1993c. Review of Cresswell (1990).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71: 336–338.
    Priest, Graham. 1994a. The Structure of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference.” Mind 103(409): 25–34.
    Priest, Graham. 1994b. Gödel’s Theorem and the Mind …Again.” in Philosophy in Mind: the Place of Philosophy in the Study of Mind, edited by Michaelis S. Michael and John Hawthorne, pp. 191–202. Philosophical Studies Series n. 60. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Published under the name “John O’Leary-Hawthorne”.
    Priest, Graham. 1994c. Review of Anderson, Belnap and Dunn (1992).” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 112–114.
    Priest, Graham. 1994d. What Could the Least Inconsistent Number Be? Logique et Analyse 37(145): 3–12.
    Priest, Graham. 1995a. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Priest, Graham. 1995b. Etchemendy and Logical Consequence.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25: 283–292.
    Priest, Graham. 1995c. Multiple Denotation, Ambiguity, and the Strange Case of the Missing Amoeba.” Logique et Analyse 38(150–152): 361–373.
    Priest, Graham. 1996. Some Priorities of Berkeley.” in Logic and Reality: Essays on the Legacy of Arthur Prior, edited by B. Jack Copeland, pp. 479–487. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Priest, Graham. 1997a. Sylvan’s Box: a Short Story and Ten Morals.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38: 573–582.
    Priest, Graham. 1997b. Yablo’s Paradox.” Analysis 57(4): 236–242.
    Priest, Graham. 1997c. On a Paradox of Hilbert and Bernays.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 26(1): 45–56.
    Priest, Graham. 1997d. Inconsistent Models of Arithmetic. Part I: Finite Models.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 26(2): 223–235.
    Priest, Graham. 1997e. Sexual Perversion.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75: 360–371.
    Priest, Graham. 1997f. Editor’s Introduction.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38: 481–487.
    Priest, Graham. 1998a. What is so Bad about Contradiction? The Journal of Philosophy 95(8): 410–426.
    Priest, Graham. 1998b. Fuzzy Identity and Local Validity.” The Monist 81(2): 331–342.
    Priest, Graham. 1998c. The Import of Inclosure: Some Comments on Grattan-Guinness (1998).” Mind 107.
    Priest, Graham. 1998d. Dialetheism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win1998/entries/dialetheism/.
    Priest, Graham. 1998e. To Be and Not to Be – That is the Answer. On Aristotle on the Law of Non-Contradiction.” in Philosophiegeschichte im Überblick, edited by Albert Newen and Uwe Meixner, pp. 91–130. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy n. 1. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
    Priest, Graham. 1998f. Validity.” in The Logica Yearbook 1997, edited by Timothy Childers, pp. 18–25. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
    Priest, Graham. 1999a. Perceiving Contradictions.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77.
    Priest, Graham. 1999b. Semantic Closure, Descriptions, and Non-Triviality.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 28(6): 549–558.
    Priest, Graham. 1999c. Validity.” in The Nature of Logic, edited by Achille C. Varzi. European Review of Philosophy n. 4. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
    Priest, Graham. 1999d. What Not? A Defence of [a] Dialetheic Theory of Negation.” in What is Negation?, edited by Dov M. Gabbay and Heinrich Theodor Wansing, pp. 101–120. Applied Logic Series n. 13. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Priest, Graham. 2000a. Logic. A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions n. 29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Priest, Graham. 2000b. Could Everything Be True? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78.
    Priest, Graham. 2000c. Truth and Contradiction.” The Philosophical Quarterly 50(200): 305–319.
    Priest, Graham. 2000d. On the Principle of Uniform Solution: A Reply to Smith (2000).” Mind 109(433): 123–126.
    Priest, Graham. 2000e. Objects of Thought.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78(4): 494–502.
    Priest, Graham. 2000f. Inconsistent Models of Arithmetic.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 65(4): 1519–1529.
    Priest, Graham. 2000g. The Logic of Backwards Inductions.” Economics and Philosophy 16(2): 267–285.
    Priest, Graham. 2001a. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Priest, Graham. 2001b. Paraconsistent Belief Revision.” Theoria 67(3).
    Priest, Graham. 2001c. Why It’s Irrational to Believe in Consistency.” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Wittgenstein Symposium: Rationality and Irrationality, edited by Berit Brogaard and Barry Smith, pp. 284–293. Schriftenreihe der Österreichischen Ludwig Wittgenstein Gesellschaft n. 29. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
    Priest, Graham. 2001d. Heidegger and the Grammar of Being.” in A Boole Anthology. Recent and Classical Studies in the Logic of George Boole, edited by James Gasser, pp. 238–252. Synthese Library n. 291. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Priest, Graham. 2002a. Beyond the Limits of Thought. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Revised, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199254057.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2002b. Paraconsistent Logic.” in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume VI, edited by Dov M. Gabbay and Franz Guenthner, 2nd ed., pp. 287–394. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Priest, Graham. 2002c. David Lewis: A View from down Under.” Noûs 36(2): 351–358.
    Priest, Graham. 2002d. The Hooded Man.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 31: 445–467.
    Priest, Graham. 2002e. Logicians Setting Together Contradictories: A Perspective on Relevance, Paraconsistency, and Dialetheism.” in A Companion to Philosophical Logic, edited by Dale Jacquette, pp. 651–664. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, doi:10.1002/9780470996751.
    Priest, Graham. 2002f. Inconsistency and the Empirical Sciences.” in Inconsistency in Science, edited by Joke Meheus, pp. 119–128. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0085-6.
    Priest, Graham. 2003a. A Site for Sorites.” in Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox, edited by J. C. Beall, pp. 9–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Priest, Graham. 2003b. Review of Williamson (2000).” The Journal of Philosophy 100(5): 268–271.
    Priest, Graham. 2003c. Inconsistent Arithmetics: Issues Technical and Philosophical.” in Trends in Logic: 50 Years of Studia Logica, edited by Vincent F. Hendricks and Jacek Malinowski, pp. 273–299. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Priest, Graham. 2003d. Meinongianism and the Philosophy of Mathematics.” Philosophia Mathematica 11(1): 3–15.
    Priest, Graham. 2003e. Where Is Philosophy at the Start of the Twenty-First Century? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103: 85–99.
    Priest, Graham. 2004a. Spiking the Field-Artillery.” in Deflationism and Paradox, edited by J. C. Beall and Bradley Armour-Garb, pp. 41–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199287116.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2004b. What’s so Bad About Contradictions? in The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, edited by Graham Priest, J. C. Beall, and Bradley Armour-Garb, pp. 23–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265176.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2004c. Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Gödel’s Theorem.” in Wittgenstein’s Lasting Significance, edited by Max Kölbel and Bernhard Weiss, pp. 207–227. London: Routledge.
    Priest, Graham. 2004d. Dialetheism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2004/entries/dialetheism/.
    Priest, Graham. 2005a. Towards Non-Being. The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0199262543.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2005b. Review of Maudlin (2004).” The Journal of Philosophy 102(9): 483–486.
    Priest, Graham. 2005c. Words Without Knowledge.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71(3): 686–694.
    Priest, Graham. 2005d. Motion.” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Donald M. Borchert, 2nd ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Priest, Graham. 2006a. Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0199263280.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2006b. In Contradiction. A Study of the Transconsistent. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First edition: Priest (1987a), doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2006c. The Limits of Knowledge.” in The Logica Yearbook 2005, edited by Marta Bı́lková and Ondřej Tomala, pp. 165–176. Praha: Filosofia. Nakladetelstvı́ Filosofického ústavu AV ČR.
    Priest, Graham. 2007a. Revenge, Field, and ZF.” in Revenge of the Liar. New Essays on the Paradox, edited by J. C. Beall, pp. 225–233. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199233915.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2007b. Paraconsistency and Dialetheism.” in Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 8: The Many Valued and Non-Monotonic Turn in Logic, edited by Dov M. Gabbay and John Woods, pp. 129–204. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
    Priest, Graham. 2008a. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. From If to Is. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First edition: Priest (2001a), doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801174.
    Priest, Graham. 2008b. Jaina Logic: A Contemporary Perspective.” History and Philosophy of Logic 29(3): 263–278.
    Priest, Graham. 2008c. Logical Pluralism Hollandaise.” Australasian Journal of Logic 6: 210–214.
    Priest, Graham. 2008d. The Closing of the Mind: How the Particular Quantifier Became Existentially Loaded Behind our Backs.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 1(1): 42–55.
    Priest, Graham. 2008e. Many-Valued Modal Logics: A Simple Approach.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 1(2): 190–203.
    Priest, Graham. 2008f. Précis of Priest (2005a).” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 185–190.
    Priest, Graham. 2008g. Replies to Nolan (2008) and Kroon (2008).” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 208–214.
    Priest, Graham. 2009a. Beyond the Limits of Knowledge.” in, pp. 93–104.
    Priest, Graham. 2009b. Not to Be.” in The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, edited by Robin Le Poidevin, Peter M. Simons, Andrew McGonigal, and Ross P. Cameron, pp. 234–245. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203879306.
    Priest, Graham. 2009c. Conditionals: A Debate with Jackson.” in Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals. Themes from the Philosophy of Frank Jackson, edited by Ian Ravenscroft, pp. 311–336. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267989.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2010a. Non-Transitive Identity.” in Cuts and Clouds. Vagueness, Its Nature, and Its Logic, edited by Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, pp. 406–415. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570386.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2010b. Review of Hyde (2008) and of Smith (2008).” History and Philosophy of Logic 31(2): 177–184.
    Priest, Graham. 2010c. A Case of Mistaken Identity? in The Force of Argument. Essays in Honor of Timothy Smiley, edited by Jonathan Lear and Alex Oliver, pp. 205–222. London: Routledge.
    Priest, Graham. 2011a. Against against Nonbeing.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 4(2): 237–253.
    Priest, Graham. 2011b. Review of Azzouni (2010).” Philosophia Mathematica 19(3): 359–363.
    Priest, Graham. 2011c. Paraconsistent Set Theory.” in Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy: Vintage Enthusiasms. Essays in Honour of John L. Bell, edited by David DeVidi, Michael Hallett, and Peter Clark, pp. 153–170. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 75. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Priest, Graham. 2012a. The Sun May Not, Indeed, Rise Tomorrow: A Reply to Beall (2012).” Analysis 72(4): 739–741.
    Priest, Graham. 2012b. Definition Inclosed: A Reply to [Zhong (2012)].” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90(4): 789–795.
    Priest, Graham. 2012c. Read on Bradwardine on the Liar.” in Insolubles and Consequences. Essays in Honour of Stephen Read, edited by Catarina Dutilh-Novaes and Ole Thomassen Hjortland. Tributes n. 18. London: King’s College Publications.
    Priest, Graham. 2013a. Three Heresies in Logic and Metaphysics.” Polish Journal of Philosophy 7(2): 9–20.
    Priest, Graham. 2013b. The Martial Arts and Buddhist Philosophy.” in Philosophy and Sport, edited by Anthony O’Hear, pp. 17–28. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement n. 73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Priest, Graham. 2013c. Replies.” Polish Journal of Philosophy 7(2): 93–108.
    Priest, Graham. 2013d. Between the Horns of Idealism and Realism: The Middle Way of Madhyamaka.” in A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, edited by Steven M. Emmanuel, pp. 214–222. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, doi:10.1002/9781118324004.
    Priest, Graham. 2014a. One. Being an Investigation into the Unity of Reality and of its Parts, including the Singular Object which is Nothingness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688258.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2014b. Contradictory Concepts.” in Contradictions. Logic, History, Actuality, edited by Elena Ficara, pp. 13–26. Berlin Studies in Knowledge Research n. 6. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    Priest, Graham. 2014c. Logical Pluralism: Another Application for Chunk and Permeate.” Erkenntnis 79(suppl., 2): 331–338.
    Priest, Graham. 2014d. Much Ado About Nothing.” Australasian Journal of Logic 11(2).
    Priest, Graham. 2014e. Sein Language.” The Monist 97(4): 430–442.
    Priest, Graham. 2014f. Revising Logic.” in The Metaphysics of Logic, edited by Penelope Rush, pp. 211–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139626279.016.
    Priest, Graham. 2015a. Is the Ternary R Depraved? in Foundations of Logical Consequence, edited by Colin R. Caret and Ole Thomassen Hjortland, pp. 121–135. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715696.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2015b. Kripke’s Thought-Paradox and the 5th Antinomy.” in Unifying the Philosophy of Truth, edited by Theodora Achourioti, Henri Galinon, José Martı́nez Fernández, and Kentaro Fujimoto, pp. 495–495. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science n. 36. Cham: Springer.
    Priest, Graham. 2015c. Stop Making Sense.” Philosophical Topics 43(1–2): 285–299.
    Priest, Graham. 2015d. Speaking of the Ineffable, East and West.” European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 11(2): 6–20.
    Priest, Graham. 2016a. Towards Non-Being. The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First edition: Priest (2005a), doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783596.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2016b. Comment on Restall.” Thought 5(2): 125.
    Priest, Graham. 2016c. Logical Disputes and the A Priori.” Logique et Analyse 59(236): 347–366.
    Priest, Graham. 2016d. Thinking the Impossible.” Philosophical Studies 173(10): 2649–2662, doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0668-5.
    Priest, Graham. 2017a. Logic. A Very Short Introduction. 2nd ed. Very Short Introductions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198758716.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2017b. What is the Specificity of Classical Mathematics? Thought 6(2): 115–121.
    Priest, Graham. 2017c. Contradiction and the Instant of Change Revisited.” Vivarium 55(1–3): 217–226.
    Priest, Graham. 2017d. Where Laws Conflict: An Application of the Method of Chunk and Permeate.” in Law and the New Logics, edited by H. Patrick Glenn and Lionel D. Smith, pp. 168–180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316227329.
    Priest, Graham. 2017e. Thinking the Impossible.” Argumenta 4: 181–194. Republication of Priest (2016d), doi:10.23811/41.arg2017.pri.
    Priest, Graham. 2018a. Buddhist Dependence.” in Reality and its Structure. Essays in Fundamentality, edited by Ricki Leigh Bliss and Graham Priest, pp. 126–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198755630.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham. 2018b. Paradoxical Propositions.” in Philosophical Issues 28: Philosophy of Logic and Inferential Reasoning, edited by Cory Juhl and Joshua Schechter, pp. 300–307. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; Sons, Inc., doi:10.1111/phis.12126.
    Priest, Graham. 2019a. Some Comments and Replies.” in Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, edited by Can Başkent and Thomas Macaulay Ferguson, pp. 575–676. Cham: Springer Nature, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25365-3.
    Priest, Graham. 2019b. Crossing Boundaries.” in Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, edited by Can Başkent and Thomas Macaulay Ferguson, pp. 677–690. Cham: Springer Nature, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25365-3.
    Priest, Graham. 2019c. Objects That Are Not Objects.” in Quo Vadis, Metaphysics? Essays in Honor of Peter van Inwagen, edited by Mirosław Szatkowski, pp. 217–232. Philosophical Analysis n. 81. Berlin: de Gruyter, doi:10.1515/9783110664812.
    Priest, Graham. 2020. The Fifth Corner of Four. An Essay on Buddhist Metaphysics and the Catukoi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Priest, Graham, Beall, J. C. and Armour-Garb, Bradley, eds. 2004. The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265176.001.0001.
    Priest, Graham and Berto, Francesco. 2008. Dialetheism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/dialetheism/.
    Priest, Graham and Berto, Francesco. 2013. Dialetheism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/dialetheism/.
    Priest, Graham, Berto, Francesco and Weber, Zach. 2018. Dialetheism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dialetheism/.
    Priest, Graham, Berto, Francesco and Weber, Zach. 2022. Dialetheism.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/dialetheism/.
    Priest, Graham and Crosthwaite, Jan. 1989. Relevance, Truth and Meaning.” in Directions in Relevant Logic, edited by Jean Norman and Richard Sylvan, pp. 377–397. Reason and Argument n. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Priest, Graham and Gabriel, Markus. 2022. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Priest, Graham and Read, Stephen. 1977. The Formalization of Ockham’s Theory of Supposition.” Mind 86: 109–113.
    Priest, Graham and Read, Stephen. 1980. Merely Confused Supposition: A Theoretical Advance or a Mere Confusion? Franciscan Studies 40: 265–297.
    Priest, Graham and Read, Stephen. 1981. Ockham’s Rejection of Ampliation.” Mind 90: 274–279.
    Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Richard. 1989a. Classical Logic aufgehoben.” in Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by Graham Priest, Richard Sylvan, and Jean Norman. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.
    Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Richard. 1989b. An Outline of the History of (Logical) Dialectic.” in Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by Graham Priest, Richard Sylvan, and Jean Norman. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.
    Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Richard. 1989c. Systems of Paraconsistent Logic.” in Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by Graham Priest, Richard Sylvan, and Jean Norman. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.
    Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Richard. 1989d. Applications of Paraconsistent Logic.” in Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by Graham Priest, Richard Sylvan, and Jean Norman. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.
    Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Richard. 1989e. The Philosophical Significance and Inevitability of Paraconsistency.” in Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by Graham Priest, Richard Sylvan, and Jean Norman. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.
    Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Richard. 1989f. A Preliminary History of Paraconsistent and Dialethic Approaches.” in Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by Graham Priest, Richard Sylvan, and Jean Norman. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.
    Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Richard. 1992. Simplified Semantics for Basic Relevant Logics.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 21(2): 217–232.
    Priest, Graham, Sylvan, Richard and Norman, Jean, eds. 1989. Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Analytica: Investigations in Logic, Ontology, and the Philosophy of Language. München: Philosophia Verlag, doi:10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.
    Priest, Graham and Tanaka, Koji. 1996. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall1997/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham and Tanaka, Koji. 1997. On an Error in Grove’s Proof.” Logique et Analyse 40(158): 215–217.
    Priest, Graham and Tanaka, Koji. 2004. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham and Tanaka, Koji. 2007. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2007/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham and Tanaka, Koji. 2009. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham, Tanaka, Koji and Weber, Zach. 2013. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham, Tanaka, Koji and Weber, Zach. 2016. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham, Tanaka, Koji and Weber, Zach. 2017. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham, Tanaka, Koji and Weber, Zach. 2018. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Priest, Graham, Tanaka, Koji and Weber, Zach. 2022. Paraconsistent Logic.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
    Wansing, Heinrich Theodor and Priest, Graham. 2015. External Curries.” The Journal of Philosophical Logic 44(4): 453–471.
    Weber, Zach, Ripley, David, Priest, Graham, Hyde, Dominic and Colyvan, Mark. 2014. Tolerating Gluts.” Mind 123(491): 813–828.

Further References

    Anderson, Alan Ross, Belnap, Nuel D., Jr. and Dunn, Michael J. 1992. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. Volume 2. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Azzouni, Jody. 2010. Talking about Nothing. Numbers, Hallucinations, and Fictions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199738946.001.0001.
    Beall, J. C. 2012. Why Priest’s Reassurance is Not Reassuring.” Analysis 72(3): 517–525.
    Cresswell, Maxwell J. 1990. Entities and Indices. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy n. 41. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2139-9.
    Elgin, Catherine Z., ed. 1997. The Philosophy of Nelson Goodman. New York: Garland Publishing Co.
    Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 1998. Structural Similarity or Structuralism? Comments on Priest’s Analysis of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference.” Mind 107(428): 823–834.
    Haack, Susan. 1974. Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. Expanded version 1996.
    Hyde, Dominic. 2008. Vagueness, Logic and Ontology. Ashgate New Critical Thinking in Philosophy. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
    Jackson, Frank. 1987. Conditionals. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Kroon, Frederick William. 2008. Much Ado About Nothing: Priest and the Reinvention of Noneism [on Priest (2005a)].” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 199–207.
    Maudlin, Tim. 2004. Truth and Paradox. Solving the Riddles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0199247293.001.0001.
    Nolan, Daniel Patrick. 2008. Properties and Paradox in Priest (2005a).” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 191–198.
    Smith, Nicholas J. J. 2000. The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference).” Mind 109.
    Smith, Nicholas J. J. 2008. Vagueness and Degrees of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233007.001.0001.
    Steiner, Mark, ed. 1975. Mathematical Knowledge. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
    Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/019925656X.001.0001.
    Zhong, Haixia. 2012. Definability and the Structure of Logical Paradoxes.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90(4): 779–788.